Chapter 14.7
Counties where donors and voters diverge
Across counties, donors lean left where the Democratic vote is higher (correlation −0.85, weighted by votes), and 74 of the 98 Democratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors are at least 30% Black.
Under this chapter's definition, the donor pool leans opposite to the 2020 presidential vote in 570570 countiesEstimandcount of counties on the two off-diagonal sides of the sign rulen2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of 2,8392,839 countiesEstimandcount of counties in the framen2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME counties, or 20.1%20.1% percent of countiesEstimandshare of counties whose donor lean and vote lean have opposite signsn2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME. We call these counties divergent. A county's donor lean is the mean CFscoreCFscoreA left-right position estimated from whom a donor gives to, or from who gives to a candidate. Negative values are left and positive values are right, and a donor keeps one score across all their giving. of its reliable donors, on a scale where negative is left and positive is right, and a county is divergent when it voted Democratic and its donor lean is right of zero, or voted Republican and its donor lean is left of zero. The count depends on the definition, and Figure 10 gives counts from 112112 countiesEstimandsmallest count of divergent counties across the eight rowsWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties under each of the eight definitions in the definitions table (the frame differs by row)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME to 1,0301,030 countiesEstimandlargest count of divergent counties across the eight rowsWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties under each of the eight definitions in the definitions table (the frame differs by row)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME counties, or 3.9%3.9% percent of countiesEstimandsmallest share of counties that are divergent across the eight rowsWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties under each of the eight definitions in the definitions table (the frame differs by row)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME to 36.3%36.3% percent of countiesEstimandlargest share of counties that are divergent across the eight rowsWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties under each of the eight definitions in the definitions table (the frame differs by row)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of the counties under each definition. Divergent counties cast 16.0%16.0% percent of two-party votesEstimandshare of two-party votes cast in divergent countiesn2,839Weightstwo-party votes in 2020Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of the two-party votes and hold 12.7%12.7% percent of reliable donorsEstimandshare of reliable donors living in divergent countiesn2,839Weightsreliable donorsPopulationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of the reliable donors, a smaller share than their 20.1%20.1% percent of countiesEstimandshare of counties whose donor lean and vote lean have opposite signsn2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of counties, and 99 countiesEstimandcount of divergent countiesn100Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationthe 100 counties of the frame with the most two-party votesPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of the 100100 countiesEstimandsize of the group comparedWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationthe counties of the frame with the most two-party votesPeriod2020 presidential voteSourceDIME counties with the most votes are divergent.
Donor lean and the vote move together across counties. Donor lean falls as the Democratic share rises, with a correlationCorrelationA number from minus 1 to plus 1 for how closely two measures move together in a straight-line pattern. Zero means no straight-line pattern; a correlation does not say that one measure causes the other. of −0.85 (95% CI −0.87 to −0.83)−0.85 correlation coefficientEstimandcorrelation of county Democratic share and county donor leanInterval95% CI −0.87 to −0.83n2,839Weightstwo-party votes in 2020 (county-equal in the companion fact)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIMENoteCounty bootstrap, 2000 replicates, seed 12345. when counties are weighted by their votes and −0.67 (95% CI −0.70 to −0.65)−0.67 correlation coefficientEstimandcorrelation of county Democratic share and county donor leanInterval95% CI −0.70 to −0.65n2,839Weightsnone (each county counted once)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIMENoteCounty bootstrap, 2000 replicates, seed 12345. when each county counts once. The exceptions come in two groups. 9898 countiesEstimandcount of Democratic-voting counties with a right-leaning donor pooln2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME Democratic-voting counties have right-leaning donors, and 7474 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn98Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors that are at least 30% BlackPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of them are at least 30%30% percent of residents, non-Hispanic BlackEstimanddefinition of a groupWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties grouped as at least 30% BlackPeriod2020SourceCounty demographics panel Black. 472472 countiesEstimandcount of Republican-voting counties with a left-leaning donor pooln2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME Republican-voting counties have left-leaning donors, and they appear in every region.
Zero is where the CFscore scale changes sign, and it is not the middle of the data. Reliable donors average −0.274 (95% CI −0.275 to −0.273)−0.274 CFscore units (negative is left)Estimandmean CFscore, each donor counted onceInterval95% CI −0.275 to −0.273n4,717,221Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationreliable donors in the donor filePeriod1980-2024SourceDIMENoteDonors are administrative records, so the interval treats them as independent draws. on the scale, so the pool as a whole leans left, while the average county has a donor lean of +0.18+0.18 CFscore units (negative is left)Estimandmean of the county donor lean, each county counted oncen2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME, because the counties with the most donors lean left. A county called left-leaning here can therefore sit to the right of the average donor, and 368368 countiesEstimandcount with a donor lean above the mean CFscore of all reliable donorsn472Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationRepublican-voting counties with left-leaning donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of the 472472 countiesEstimandcount of Republican-voting counties with a left-leaning donor pooln2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME Republican-voting counties with left-leaning donors do. The standard deviationStandard deviationA measure of how far values typically fall from their average. A larger standard deviation means the values are more spread out. of reliable donors' scores is 1.011.01 CFscore unitsEstimandstandard deviation of donor CFscoresn4,717,221Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationreliable donors in the donor filePeriod1980-2024SourceDIME, which is the scale for reading a county lean such as the 0.250.25 CFscore unitsEstimanddefinition of a map classWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcut of the map on either side of zeroPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME cut used below.
How donors and votes are measured
The donor data are the Stanford DIME files [1]. DIME gives each individual donor one CFscore, estimated from the recipients the donor gave to, and one most recent county. The file holds 36.4 million36.4 million donorsEstimandcount of donorsn36,402,792Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationall individual donors with a CFscore and a county, reliable or notPeriod1980-2024SourceDIME donors with a score and a county. This chapter keeps the 4.7 million4.7 million donorsEstimandcount of donorsn4,717,221Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationreliable individual donors with a CFscore and a countyPeriod1980-2024SourceDIME of them (13.0%13.0% percent of donorsEstimandshare of donors who are reliablen36,402,792Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationall individual donors with a CFscore and a countyPeriod1980-2024SourceDIME) who are reliable, meaning that they gave to at least 88 distinct recipientsEstimanddefinition of a reliable donorWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationdonors counted as reliablePeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME distinct recipients and that their score comes from their own giving. A county's pool is its reliable donors, and a county enters the analysis when its pool has at least 2525 reliable donorsEstimanddefinition of the frame (minimum pool)Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME donors (the pool floor) and it has a 2020 return. That leaves 2,8392,839 countiesEstimandcount of counties in the framen2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME counties with 4.7 million4.7 million donorsEstimandcount of donorsn4,713,191Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationreliable donors in the counties of the framePeriod1980-2024SourceDIME reliable donors. The county vote is the Democratic share of the 2020 two-party presidential vote.
Two weightings appear throughout. A count or share of counties counts each county once. A correlation or regression is reported under both weightings, counting each county once and weighting by 2020 two-party votes, because the two answer different questions: whether a pattern holds place by place, and whether it holds where voters live.Intervals on correlations are 95% confidence intervalsConfidence intervalA range around an estimate that would contain the true value in 95% of repeated samples if the sampling model held. The book reports 95% intervals unless it says otherwise. from a bootstrap, which recomputes the correlation on many random resamples of the counties, drawn with a fixed seed, and reads the interval from the spread of the results. Counts and shares of counties are full counts and carry no interval. The mean of a single county's donors has a standard error, which the map tooltip, the named counties and the section on pool size use. The distribution of donor scores over time is the subject of Chapter 14.4, The ideology of the donor pool, and where the donors live is the subject of Chapter 14.2, The geography of donations (planned).
Donor lean tracks the vote in most counties
Figure 1 marks the divergent counties against the counties where donors and vote lean the same way.
Figure 1
Democratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors cluster in the South; Republican-voting counties with left-leaning donors are in every region
Counties classed by whether the 2020 two-party presidential vote and the mean CFscore of the county's reliable donors lean the same way (negative CFscore is left, positive is right)
Loading county values
Donor lean against the 2020 vote
No data (3,143 counties)
Select a class to show only those places.
Hover or tap a county for its value, or search by name. Zoom with the buttons on the map, then drag to move it.
- Alaska draws as no data. Its election returns are reported by election district, and the district codes cannot be matched to boroughs and census areas.
Among the Democratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors, 8989 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn89Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors, in the SouthPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME are in the South, 66 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn6Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors, in the WestPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME in the West, 33 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn3Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors, in the MidwestPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME in the Midwest and 00 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn0Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors, in the NortheastPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME in the Northeast. Mississippi alone has 1616 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn16Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors, in MississippiPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME. The Republican-voting counties with left-leaning donors are spread across the Midwest (184184 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn184Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationRepublican-voting counties with left-leaning donors, in the MidwestPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME), the South (139139 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn139Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationRepublican-voting counties with left-leaning donors, in the SouthPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME), the West (7676 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn76Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationRepublican-voting counties with left-leaning donors, in the WestPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME) and the Northeast (7373 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn73Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationRepublican-voting counties with left-leaning donors, in the NortheastPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME). The first group casts 4.5%4.5% percent of two-party votesEstimandshare of two-party votes cast in these countiesn2,839Weightstwo-party votes in 2020Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of the two-party votes and the second 11.6%11.6% percent of two-party votesEstimandshare of two-party votes cast in these countiesn2,839Weightstwo-party votes in 2020Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME.
Figure 2 puts the same two measures on axes. Divergent counties are the dots in the upper right and lower left quadrants, and many lie close to a cut point. Of the Democratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors, 38.8%38.8% percent of countiesEstimandshare with a Democratic share below the upper cutn98Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with right-leaning donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME have a Democratic share below 55%55% percent Democratic, two-party voteEstimanddefinition of a map classWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationupper cut of the mapPeriod2020SourceCounty election returns and 50.0%50.0% percent of countiesEstimandshare with donor lean within the cut of zeron98Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with right-leaning donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME have a donor lean within 0.250.25 CFscore unitsEstimanddefinition of a map classWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcut of the map on either side of zeroPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of zero. The same shares for Republican-voting counties with left-leaning donors are 19.9%19.9% percent of countiesEstimandshare with a Democratic share at or above the lower cutn472Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationRepublican-voting counties with left-leaning donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME (a Democratic share of 45%45% percent Democratic, two-party voteEstimanddefinition of a map classWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationlower cut of the mapPeriod2020SourceCounty election returns or more) and 73.1%73.1% percent of countiesEstimandshare with donor lean within the cut of zeron472Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationRepublican-voting counties with left-leaning donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME. The tooltip of the map flags the counties that clear both cut points. They number 112112 countiesEstimandcount of counties in the two corner classes of the mapn2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME, of which 2727 countiesEstimandcount of counties in the Democratic-vote, right-donor corner class of the mapn2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME are Democratic-voting counties with a Democratic share of 55%55% percent Democratic, two-party voteEstimanddefinition of a map classWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationupper cut of the mapPeriod2020SourceCounty election returns or more and a donor lean of 0.250.25 CFscore unitsEstimanddefinition of a map classWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcut of the map on either side of zeroPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME or more, 2626 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn27Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties in the Democratic-vote, right-donor corner class, in the SouthPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of them in the South, and 8585 countiesEstimandcount of counties in the Republican-vote, left-donor corner class of the mapn2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME are Republican-voting counties with a share below 45%45% percent Democratic, two-party voteEstimanddefinition of a map classWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationlower cut of the mapPeriod2020SourceCounty election returns and a donor lean below minus 0.250.25 CFscore unitsEstimanddefinition of a map classWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcut of the map on either side of zeroPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME, in all four regions. Together they are 3.9%3.9% percent of countiesEstimandshare of counties in the two corner classesn2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of counties and cast 1.2%1.2% percent of two-party votesEstimandshare of two-party votes cast in the two corner classesn2,839Weightstwo-party votes in 2020Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of the two-party votes.
Figure 2
Donor lean falls as the Democratic share of the vote rises, and the divergent counties lie in the two quadrants where the two measures disagree
Mean CFscore of reliable donors against the Democratic share of the two-party presidential vote, one dot per county (n = 2,839 counties), 2020 vote
- Vote and donors lean the same way
- Democratic vote, right-leaning donors
- Republican vote, left-leaning donors
- Dot area: Two-party votes, 2020420,0001,500,0004,200,000
Show data
| County | Democratic share (%) | Donor lean (mean CFscore) | Donor lean, 95% interval, low | Donor lean, 95% interval, high | Two-party votes | Reliable donors | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autauga, AL | 27.4 | +0.680 | +0.54 | +0.82 | 27,341 | 223 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Baldwin, AL | 22.7 | +0.364 | +0.31 | +0.42 | 108,122 | 1,914 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Barbour, AL | 46.1 | +0.441 | +0.24 | +0.64 | 10,438 | 100 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Bibb, AL | 20.9 | +0.700 | +0.43 | +0.97 | 9,511 | 47 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Blount, AL | 9.7 | +0.468 | +0.29 | +0.64 | 27,351 | 158 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Bullock, AL | 75.0 | +0.369 | +0.04 | +0.69 | 4,592 | 40 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Butler, AL | 42.1 | +0.759 | +0.53 | +0.98 | 9,423 | 61 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Calhoun, AL | 30.2 | +0.462 | +0.37 | +0.55 | 50,317 | 522 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Chambers, AL | 42.1 | +0.485 | +0.25 | +0.72 | 15,118 | 83 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Cherokee, AL | 13.3 | +0.572 | +0.37 | +0.78 | 12,207 | 121 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Chilton, AL | 16.0 | +0.650 | +0.45 | +0.85 | 19,158 | 112 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Clarke, AL | 44.0 | +0.584 | +0.35 | +0.82 | 13,079 | 66 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Clay, AL | 18.4 | +0.740 | +0.50 | +0.98 | 6,868 | 51 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Cleburne, AL | 9.4 | +0.852 | +0.54 | +1.16 | 7,159 | 35 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Coffee, AL | 23.1 | +0.690 | +0.57 | +0.82 | 21,975 | 258 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Colbert, AL | 30.3 | +0.335 | +0.20 | +0.47 | 27,546 | 259 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Conecuh, AL | 46.3 | +0.734 | +0.41 | +1.06 | 6,408 | 32 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Coosa, AL | 33.1 | +0.357 | −0.07 | +0.78 | 5,427 | 27 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Covington, AL | 15.7 | +0.421 | +0.24 | +0.61 | 17,307 | 140 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Crenshaw, AL | 25.9 | +0.425 | +0.07 | +0.78 | 6,564 | 31 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Cullman, AL | 10.8 | +0.516 | +0.40 | +0.63 | 41,358 | 355 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Dale, AL | 26.5 | +0.590 | +0.43 | +0.75 | 19,473 | 184 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Dallas, AL | 68.9 | +0.209 | +0.03 | +0.39 | 17,754 | 138 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| DeKalb, AL | 14.7 | +0.385 | +0.25 | +0.52 | 29,048 | 243 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Elmore, AL | 25.6 | +0.557 | +0.44 | +0.68 | 40,531 | 344 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Escambia, AL | 31.2 | +0.895 | +0.75 | +1.04 | 15,787 | 120 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Etowah, AL | 24.6 | +0.381 | +0.28 | +0.48 | 47,095 | 475 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Fayette, AL | 16.0 | +0.727 | +0.46 | +0.99 | 8,695 | 47 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Franklin, AL | 16.7 | +0.546 | +0.34 | +0.75 | 12,462 | 88 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Geneva, AL | 12.8 | +0.967 | +0.76 | +1.18 | 12,443 | 68 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Greene, AL | 81.6 | +0.066 | −0.29 | +0.42 | 4,759 | 29 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Hale, AL | 59.5 | +0.792 | +0.49 | +1.09 | 7,877 | 35 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Henry, AL | 28.3 | +0.755 | +0.47 | +1.04 | 9,213 | 53 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Houston, AL | 28.4 | +0.697 | +0.61 | +0.78 | 45,535 | 592 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Jackson, AL | 15.9 | +0.341 | +0.16 | +0.52 | 23,387 | 166 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Jefferson, AL | 56.7 | +0.060 | +0.03 | +0.09 | 320,531 | 6,805 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Lamar, AL | 13.7 | +0.656 | +0.36 | +0.96 | 7,152 | 42 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Lauderdale, AL | 27.3 | +0.219 | +0.13 | +0.31 | 43,636 | 574 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Lawrence, AL | 22.4 | +0.357 | +0.10 | +0.61 | 15,884 | 78 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Lee, AL | 39.8 | +0.137 | +0.07 | +0.20 | 70,081 | 1,117 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Limestone, AL | 28.3 | +0.348 | +0.24 | +0.45 | 48,312 | 490 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Lowndes, AL | 73.0 | +0.581 | +0.22 | +0.94 | 6,808 | 32 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Macon, AL | 82.2 | −0.281 | −0.49 | −0.07 | 8,649 | 90 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Madison, AL | 45.9 | +0.137 | +0.10 | +0.17 | 190,066 | 4,343 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Marengo, AL | 50.7 | +0.433 | +0.17 | +0.70 | 10,831 | 64 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Marion, AL | 10.7 | +0.541 | +0.37 | +0.71 | 13,668 | 119 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Marshall, AL | 15.2 | +0.619 | +0.52 | +0.72 | 39,134 | 433 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Mobile, AL | 44.0 | +0.429 | +0.39 | +0.47 | 180,717 | 2,624 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Monroe, AL | 42.0 | +0.713 | +0.47 | +0.96 | 10,602 | 51 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Montgomery, AL | 66.0 | +0.312 | +0.27 | +0.35 | 97,840 | 2,364 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Morgan, AL | 25.0 | +0.442 | +0.36 | +0.53 | 52,898 | 653 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Pickens, AL | 41.8 | +0.589 | +0.34 | +0.84 | 9,616 | 54 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Pike, AL | 41.2 | +0.653 | +0.50 | +0.81 | 13,678 | 145 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Randolph, AL | 20.5 | +0.591 | +0.32 | +0.87 | 10,762 | 58 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Russell, AL | 53.2 | −0.042 | −0.23 | +0.14 | 21,092 | 143 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| St. Clair, AL | 17.6 | +0.481 | +0.35 | +0.61 | 43,910 | 309 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Shelby, AL | 29.4 | +0.373 | +0.32 | +0.43 | 112,968 | 1,769 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Sumter, AL | 74.4 | +0.470 | +0.19 | +0.75 | 6,246 | 56 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Talladega, AL | 37.1 | +0.472 | +0.35 | +0.60 | 35,373 | 277 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Tallapoosa, AL | 28.1 | +0.527 | +0.37 | +0.68 | 20,822 | 179 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Tuscaloosa, AL | 42.5 | +0.137 | +0.08 | +0.20 | 88,882 | 1,319 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Walker, AL | 15.7 | +0.659 | +0.55 | +0.77 | 30,836 | 265 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Washington, AL | 25.6 | +0.546 | +0.19 | +0.90 | 8,822 | 36 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Wilcox, AL | 68.8 | +0.643 | +0.34 | +0.95 | 5,881 | 36 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Winston, AL | 8.7 | +0.666 | +0.44 | +0.89 | 11,169 | 79 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Apache, AZ | 67.1 | +0.003 | −0.15 | +0.16 | 34,735 | 245 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Cochise, AZ | 40.0 | −0.097 | −0.15 | −0.04 | 59,289 | 1,742 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Coconino, AZ | 62.3 | −0.528 | −0.56 | −0.49 | 71,750 | 2,490 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Gila, AZ | 32.7 | +0.207 | +0.11 | +0.30 | 27,320 | 610 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Graham, AZ | 27.3 | +0.370 | +0.19 | +0.55 | 14,783 | 166 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Greenlee, AZ | 32.7 | +0.005 | −0.34 | +0.35 | 3,615 | 47 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| La Paz, AZ | 30.4 | +0.640 | +0.43 | +0.85 | 7,365 | 120 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Maricopa, AZ | 51.1 | −0.112 | −0.12 | −0.10 | 2,036,439 | 60,280 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Mohave, AZ | 24.0 | +0.447 | +0.39 | +0.50 | 103,366 | 1,858 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Navajo, AZ | 45.8 | +0.232 | +0.14 | +0.32 | 51,040 | 729 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Pima, AZ | 59.5 | −0.427 | −0.44 | −0.41 | 512,739 | 23,180 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Pinal, AZ | 41.2 | −0.069 | −0.11 | −0.03 | 182,183 | 3,495 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Santa Cruz, AZ | 68.0 | −0.435 | −0.52 | −0.35 | 19,332 | 550 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Yavapai, AZ | 35.1 | −0.070 | −0.10 | −0.04 | 141,129 | 5,698 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Yuma, AZ | 46.9 | +0.357 | +0.29 | +0.43 | 68,744 | 1,150 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Arkansas, AR | 29.7 | +0.309 | +0.18 | +0.44 | 6,122 | 129 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Ashley, AR | 27.7 | +0.631 | +0.44 | +0.83 | 7,673 | 78 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Baxter, AR | 22.6 | +0.355 | +0.24 | +0.47 | 20,471 | 365 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Benton, AR | 36.4 | +0.144 | +0.10 | +0.19 | 116,214 | 2,249 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Boone, AR | 18.3 | +0.382 | +0.25 | +0.52 | 16,716 | 226 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Bradley, AR | 34.2 | +0.305 | +0.09 | +0.52 | 3,549 | 53 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Carroll, AR | 35.1 | −0.496 | −0.60 | −0.39 | 11,447 | 327 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Chicot, AR | 56.3 | +0.532 | +0.31 | +0.75 | 4,012 | 55 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Clark, AR | 42.7 | −0.062 | −0.19 | +0.06 | 8,054 | 194 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Clay, AR | 19.1 | +0.206 | −0.03 | +0.44 | 5,048 | 55 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Cleburne, AR | 16.1 | +0.530 | +0.39 | +0.67 | 12,316 | 206 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Cleveland, AR | 18.5 | +0.745 | +0.49 | +1.00 | 3,518 | 34 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Columbia, AR | 33.8 | +0.553 | +0.42 | +0.69 | 8,314 | 163 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Conway, AR | 31.5 | +0.284 | +0.10 | +0.47 | 8,309 | 123 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Craighead, AR | 31.8 | +0.254 | +0.18 | +0.33 | 37,479 | 729 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Crawford, AR | 21.0 | +0.366 | +0.22 | +0.51 | 23,566 | 222 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Crittenden, AR | 53.7 | +0.298 | +0.15 | +0.44 | 15,847 | 204 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Cross, AR | 26.4 | +0.092 | −0.06 | +0.24 | 6,718 | 125 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Desha, AR | 51.2 | +0.270 | +0.08 | +0.46 | 3,937 | 61 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Drew, AR | 35.8 | +0.426 | +0.23 | +0.63 | 6,775 | 95 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Faulkner, AR | 34.8 | +0.105 | +0.04 | +0.17 | 52,768 | 860 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Franklin, AR | 18.6 | +0.355 | +0.11 | +0.60 | 6,977 | 70 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Fulton, AR | 20.7 | +0.331 | 0.00 | +0.66 | 4,996 | 49 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Garland, AR | 32.6 | +0.085 | +0.02 | +0.15 | 43,114 | 1,070 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Grant, AR | 15.7 | +0.292 | +0.05 | +0.53 | 8,062 | 81 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Greene, AR | 19.4 | +0.290 | +0.16 | +0.42 | 15,728 | 201 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Hempstead, AR | 32.4 | +0.477 | +0.27 | +0.69 | 6,608 | 72 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Hot Spring, AR | 25.1 | +0.262 | +0.06 | +0.47 | 12,284 | 116 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Howard, AR | 28.5 | +0.155 | −0.10 | +0.41 | 4,707 | 55 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Independence, AR | 20.0 | +0.221 | +0.10 | +0.34 | 14,056 | 252 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Izard, AR | 18.1 | +0.189 | −0.08 | +0.46 | 5,652 | 58 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Jackson, AR | 27.5 | +0.181 | +0.02 | +0.35 | 4,958 | 93 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Jefferson, AR | 61.1 | +0.163 | +0.07 | +0.25 | 24,502 | 388 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Johnson, AR | 24.8 | +0.077 | −0.15 | +0.30 | 9,221 | 93 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Lafayette, AR | 32.3 | +0.576 | +0.24 | +0.91 | 2,596 | 26 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Lawrence, AR | 19.1 | +0.620 | +0.37 | +0.87 | 5,649 | 50 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Lee, AR | 52.5 | +0.409 | +0.20 | +0.62 | 2,709 | 41 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Little River, AR | 24.8 | +0.536 | +0.15 | +0.92 | 4,941 | 31 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Logan, AR | 19.3 | +0.330 | +0.10 | +0.56 | 7,985 | 78 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Lonoke, AR | 22.6 | +0.404 | +0.30 | +0.51 | 29,570 | 366 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Madison, AR | 21.6 | +0.046 | −0.22 | +0.32 | 7,221 | 66 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Marion, AR | 20.9 | +0.175 | −0.04 | +0.39 | 7,314 | 115 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Miller, AR | 26.3 | +0.414 | +0.26 | +0.56 | 16,165 | 174 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Mississippi, AR | 38.5 | +0.358 | +0.23 | +0.49 | 11,854 | 168 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Monroe, AR | 42.6 | +0.596 | +0.31 | +0.88 | 2,692 | 35 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Montgomery, AR | 19.4 | −0.025 | −0.46 | +0.41 | 3,777 | 27 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Nevada, AR | 33.5 | −0.148 | −0.43 | +0.13 | 3,209 | 32 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Newton, AR | 18.2 | −0.475 | −0.76 | −0.19 | 3,901 | 47 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Ouachita, AR | 43.0 | +0.482 | +0.31 | +0.66 | 9,289 | 131 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Perry, AR | 22.5 | +0.252 | −0.09 | +0.60 | 4,491 | 38 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Phillips, AR | 60.0 | −0.002 | −0.17 | +0.16 | 6,040 | 101 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Pike, AR | 15.5 | +0.292 | −0.08 | +0.67 | 4,163 | 32 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Poinsett, AR | 19.4 | +0.341 | +0.14 | +0.54 | 7,342 | 80 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Polk, AR | 15.0 | +0.324 | +0.10 | +0.55 | 8,281 | 99 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Pope, AR | 24.2 | +0.320 | +0.21 | +0.43 | 23,853 | 387 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Prairie, AR | 19.0 | +0.301 | 0.00 | +0.61 | 3,440 | 38 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Pulaski, AR | 61.5 | −0.163 | −0.19 | −0.14 | 165,634 | 6,188 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Randolph, AR | 18.5 | +0.174 | −0.07 | +0.42 | 6,570 | 66 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| St. Francis, AR | 52.6 | +0.051 | −0.12 | +0.23 | 6,846 | 101 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Saline, AR | 28.9 | +0.318 | +0.23 | +0.41 | 55,616 | 707 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Searcy, AR | 14.9 | +0.434 | +0.06 | +0.81 | 3,953 | 34 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Sebastian, AR | 31.7 | +0.359 | +0.29 | +0.43 | 45,685 | 795 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Sevier, AR | 22.3 | +0.219 | −0.07 | +0.51 | 5,000 | 51 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Sharp, AR | 19.1 | +0.318 | +0.08 | +0.56 | 7,336 | 82 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Stone, AR | 20.4 | −0.072 | −0.31 | +0.16 | 5,796 | 86 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Union, AR | 34.8 | +0.616 | +0.53 | +0.71 | 16,062 | 328 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Van Buren, AR | 20.9 | +0.008 | −0.22 | +0.24 | 7,627 | 96 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Washington, AR | 48.0 | −0.346 | −0.39 | −0.31 | 91,328 | 2,238 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| White, AR | 19.8 | +0.410 | +0.31 | +0.51 | 30,160 | 392 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Woodruff, AR | 35.7 | +0.129 | −0.14 | +0.40 | 2,399 | 36 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Yell, AR | 19.7 | +0.370 | +0.12 | +0.61 | 6,510 | 67 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Alameda, CA | 81.9 | −0.840 | −0.85 | −0.83 | 753,968 | 39,788 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Alpine, CA | 66.1 | −0.565 | −0.86 | −0.27 | 720 | 37 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Amador, CA | 37.5 | −0.183 | −0.27 | −0.09 | 21,738 | 601 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Butte, CA | 50.9 | −0.425 | −0.46 | −0.39 | 99,156 | 3,195 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Calaveras, CA | 37.8 | −0.346 | −0.42 | −0.27 | 26,564 | 752 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Colusa, CA | 41.5 | +0.603 | +0.46 | +0.75 | 7,788 | 191 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Contra Costa, CA | 73.1 | −0.706 | −0.71 | −0.70 | 569,263 | 32,404 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Del Norte, CA | 42.0 | −0.404 | −0.52 | −0.28 | 11,138 | 296 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| El Dorado, CA | 45.5 | −0.318 | −0.35 | −0.28 | 113,459 | 3,482 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Fresno, CA | 54.0 | −0.054 | −0.08 | −0.03 | 357,489 | 6,335 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Glenn, CA | 36.1 | +0.410 | +0.26 | +0.56 | 11,058 | 222 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Humboldt, CA | 67.3 | −0.733 | −0.76 | −0.70 | 66,538 | 2,877 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Imperial, CA | 62.5 | +0.191 | +0.10 | +0.28 | 55,525 | 619 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Inyo, CA | 50.1 | −0.354 | −0.46 | −0.24 | 9,254 | 367 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Kern, CA | 44.8 | +0.166 | +0.13 | +0.20 | 297,850 | 4,703 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Kings, CA | 43.7 | +0.363 | +0.27 | +0.46 | 42,771 | 557 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Lake, CA | 53.2 | −0.516 | −0.58 | −0.45 | 28,064 | 886 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Lassen, CA | 23.8 | +0.236 | +0.06 | +0.41 | 11,769 | 190 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Los Angeles, CA | 72.6 | −0.592 | −0.60 | −0.59 | 4,174,415 | 163,108 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Madera, CA | 44.1 | +0.063 | −0.01 | +0.13 | 52,546 | 1,085 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Marin, CA | 83.9 | −0.808 | −0.82 | −0.80 | 152,900 | 17,069 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Mariposa, CA | 40.7 | −0.366 | −0.48 | −0.25 | 10,038 | 342 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Mendocino, CA | 68.4 | −0.787 | −0.82 | −0.76 | 42,049 | 2,280 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Merced, CA | 55.4 | +0.056 | 0.00 | +0.12 | 88,388 | 1,336 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Modoc, CA | 27.0 | −0.146 | −0.39 | +0.10 | 4,259 | 87 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Mono, CA | 61.5 | −0.672 | −0.78 | −0.57 | 6,526 | 246 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Monterey, CA | 71.1 | −0.507 | −0.53 | −0.48 | 160,252 | 6,087 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Napa, CA | 70.7 | −0.604 | −0.63 | −0.58 | 70,493 | 3,603 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Nevada, CA | 57.6 | −0.640 | −0.67 | −0.61 | 63,138 | 3,193 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Orange, CA | 54.6 | −0.158 | −0.17 | −0.15 | 1,490,507 | 45,983 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Placer, CA | 46.6 | −0.292 | −0.32 | −0.27 | 229,357 | 6,860 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Plumas, CA | 41.4 | −0.339 | −0.45 | −0.23 | 11,006 | 365 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Riverside, CA | 54.1 | −0.289 | −0.30 | −0.27 | 976,647 | 21,059 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Sacramento, CA | 63.0 | −0.518 | −0.53 | −0.51 | 700,213 | 21,776 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| San Benito, CA | 62.5 | −0.327 | −0.42 | −0.24 | 28,218 | 570 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| San Bernardino, CA | 55.4 | −0.093 | −0.11 | −0.07 | 822,116 | 12,800 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| San Diego, CA | 61.6 | −0.356 | −0.36 | −0.35 | 1,564,744 | 54,884 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| San Francisco, CA | 87.0 | −0.866 | −0.87 | −0.86 | 434,573 | 45,868 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| San Joaquin, CA | 57.1 | −0.110 | −0.14 | −0.08 | 282,235 | 4,837 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| San Luis Obispo, CA | 56.7 | −0.497 | −0.52 | −0.47 | 155,746 | 7,100 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| San Mateo, CA | 79.4 | −0.680 | −0.69 | −0.67 | 366,973 | 24,189 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Santa Barbara, CA | 66.4 | −0.523 | −0.54 | −0.50 | 195,699 | 9,410 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Santa Clara, CA | 74.2 | −0.659 | −0.67 | −0.65 | 832,579 | 39,175 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Santa Cruz, CA | 80.9 | −0.829 | −0.84 | −0.82 | 141,183 | 9,842 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Shasta, CA | 33.0 | −0.025 | −0.08 | +0.03 | 90,789 | 2,004 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Sierra, CA | 39.0 | −0.589 | −0.83 | −0.35 | 1,872 | 59 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Siskiyou, CA | 41.9 | −0.376 | −0.45 | −0.30 | 22,883 | 748 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Solano, CA | 65.5 | −0.543 | −0.57 | −0.52 | 200,945 | 5,487 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Sonoma, CA | 76.4 | −0.802 | −0.81 | −0.79 | 261,763 | 16,125 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Stanislaus, CA | 50.4 | −0.094 | −0.13 | −0.06 | 209,986 | 3,633 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Sutter, CA | 41.6 | +0.353 | +0.28 | +0.43 | 41,742 | 761 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Tehama, CA | 31.8 | +0.127 | +0.02 | +0.23 | 28,052 | 471 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Trinity, CA | 47.2 | −0.558 | −0.70 | −0.41 | 6,039 | 161 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Tulare, CA | 46.0 | +0.283 | +0.24 | +0.33 | 143,684 | 2,372 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Tuolumne, CA | 40.4 | −0.327 | −0.40 | −0.25 | 29,667 | 904 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Ventura, CA | 60.8 | −0.369 | −0.39 | −0.35 | 413,595 | 13,838 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Yolo, CA | 71.2 | −0.707 | −0.73 | −0.69 | 94,890 | 5,165 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Yuba, CA | 38.9 | −0.024 | −0.13 | +0.08 | 28,906 | 444 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Adams, CO | 58.4 | −0.280 | −0.31 | −0.25 | 229,859 | 4,579 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Alamosa, CO | 49.6 | −0.256 | −0.39 | −0.12 | 7,572 | 218 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Arapahoe, CO | 62.7 | −0.143 | −0.16 | −0.12 | 340,930 | 12,669 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Archuleta, CO | 41.9 | −0.133 | −0.25 | −0.02 | 8,927 | 390 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Baca, CO | 14.5 | +0.857 | +0.56 | +1.15 | 2,184 | 35 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Bent, CO | 32.8 | +0.177 | −0.16 | +0.51 | 2,235 | 44 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Boulder, CO | 78.9 | −0.722 | −0.73 | −0.71 | 201,590 | 16,281 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Broomfield, CO | 64.1 | −0.389 | −0.44 | −0.33 | 45,372 | 1,328 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Chaffee, CO | 53.5 | −0.429 | −0.51 | −0.35 | 13,382 | 588 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Clear Creek, CO | 56.7 | −0.287 | −0.41 | −0.16 | 6,358 | 280 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Conejos, CO | 46.1 | −0.252 | −0.47 | −0.03 | 4,245 | 73 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Costilla, CO | 63.9 | −0.388 | −0.65 | −0.13 | 2,052 | 54 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Crowley, CO | 25.6 | +0.546 | +0.16 | +0.93 | 1,708 | 34 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Custer, CO | 31.0 | −0.008 | −0.20 | +0.18 | 3,586 | 150 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Delta, CO | 31.0 | −0.167 | −0.26 | −0.08 | 18,968 | 623 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Denver, CO | 81.4 | −0.617 | −0.63 | −0.61 | 384,911 | 23,946 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Dolores, CO | 23.8 | −0.301 | −0.66 | +0.06 | 1,430 | 34 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Douglas, CO | 46.3 | +0.009 | −0.02 | +0.04 | 225,923 | 6,476 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Eagle, CO | 65.3 | −0.381 | −0.43 | −0.33 | 28,480 | 1,278 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Elbert, CO | 24.2 | +0.468 | +0.35 | +0.59 | 18,517 | 384 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| El Paso, CO | 44.4 | +0.075 | +0.05 | +0.10 | 364,769 | 9,653 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Fremont, CO | 29.6 | +0.012 | −0.09 | +0.11 | 24,886 | 547 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Garfield, CO | 51.2 | −0.297 | −0.35 | −0.24 | 30,144 | 1,288 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Gilpin, CO | 54.8 | −0.415 | −0.57 | −0.26 | 4,056 | 162 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Grand, CO | 49.1 | −0.170 | −0.29 | −0.05 | 9,593 | 321 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Gunnison, CO | 65.6 | −0.516 | −0.60 | −0.43 | 10,867 | 450 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Hinsdale, CO | 41.9 | −0.526 | −0.87 | −0.18 | 608 | 28 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Huerfano, CO | 48.5 | −0.318 | −0.49 | −0.15 | 4,279 | 152 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Jefferson, CO | 59.5 | −0.256 | −0.27 | −0.24 | 366,813 | 15,446 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Kit Carson, CO | 17.4 | +0.885 | +0.69 | +1.08 | 3,806 | 93 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Lake, CO | 60.6 | −0.395 | −0.60 | −0.19 | 3,800 | 96 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| La Plata, CO | 59.1 | −0.451 | −0.49 | −0.41 | 34,781 | 1,929 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Larimer, CO | 58.0 | −0.393 | −0.41 | −0.37 | 217,609 | 8,555 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Las Animas, CO | 44.9 | −0.059 | −0.23 | +0.11 | 7,781 | 178 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Lincoln, CO | 18.0 | +0.797 | +0.53 | +1.06 | 2,605 | 59 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Logan, CO | 21.5 | +0.716 | +0.58 | +0.86 | 10,305 | 214 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Mesa, CO | 35.7 | +0.103 | +0.06 | +0.14 | 88,430 | 2,839 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Mineral, CO | 42.6 | −0.297 | −0.70 | +0.11 | 744 | 29 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Moffat, CO | 17.5 | +0.549 | +0.35 | +0.74 | 6,873 | 123 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Montezuma, CO | 38.5 | −0.171 | −0.27 | −0.07 | 15,142 | 512 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Montrose, CO | 31.4 | +0.061 | −0.02 | +0.14 | 24,457 | 733 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Morgan, CO | 28.8 | +0.367 | +0.20 | +0.53 | 13,469 | 198 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Otero, CO | 38.5 | +0.364 | +0.17 | +0.56 | 9,361 | 136 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Ouray, CO | 60.0 | −0.439 | −0.56 | −0.32 | 3,942 | 279 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Park, CO | 41.2 | −0.178 | −0.31 | −0.04 | 11,894 | 281 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Phillips, CO | 19.9 | +0.995 | +0.77 | +1.22 | 2,444 | 57 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Pitkin, CO | 76.4 | −0.479 | −0.53 | −0.43 | 11,769 | 1,134 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Prowers, CO | 26.7 | +0.456 | +0.23 | +0.68 | 5,466 | 98 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Pueblo, CO | 50.9 | −0.090 | −0.13 | −0.04 | 86,024 | 2,174 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Rio Blanco, CO | 15.5 | +0.518 | +0.23 | +0.80 | 3,622 | 63 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Rio Grande, CO | 40.5 | +0.218 | +0.03 | +0.41 | 6,155 | 140 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Routt, CO | 64.1 | −0.390 | −0.46 | −0.32 | 16,507 | 824 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Saguache, CO | 57.1 | −0.539 | −0.68 | −0.39 | 3,297 | 161 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| San Miguel, CO | 77.5 | −0.701 | −0.77 | −0.63 | 5,060 | 380 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Sedgwick, CO | 21.2 | +0.615 | +0.19 | +1.04 | 1,422 | 26 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Summit, CO | 70.4 | −0.455 | −0.52 | −0.39 | 17,953 | 818 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Teller, CO | 32.0 | +0.032 | −0.08 | +0.14 | 16,519 | 454 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Washington, CO | 12.4 | +1.023 | +0.79 | +1.26 | 2,964 | 52 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Weld, CO | 40.7 | +0.127 | +0.09 | +0.17 | 162,205 | 3,242 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Yuma, CO | 16.0 | +0.768 | +0.62 | +0.92 | 4,892 | 160 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Fairfield, CT | 63.8 | −0.250 | −0.26 | −0.24 | 466,544 | 30,979 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Hartford, CT | 64.1 | −0.301 | −0.31 | −0.29 | 442,392 | 20,961 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Litchfield, CT | 47.4 | −0.317 | −0.34 | −0.29 | 105,765 | 5,480 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Middlesex, CT | 58.3 | −0.305 | −0.33 | −0.28 | 97,513 | 5,051 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| New Haven, CT | 58.8 | −0.365 | −0.38 | −0.35 | 412,521 | 17,560 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| New London, CT | 58.2 | −0.291 | −0.31 | −0.27 | 136,569 | 6,270 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Tolland, CT | 55.8 | −0.308 | −0.34 | −0.28 | 78,825 | 3,558 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Windham, CT | 47.8 | −0.344 | −0.38 | −0.30 | 55,842 | 2,010 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Kent, DE | 52.1 | −0.135 | −0.18 | −0.09 | 85,561 | 1,752 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| New Castle, DE | 68.8 | −0.434 | −0.45 | −0.42 | 283,398 | 10,135 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Sussex, DE | 44.3 | −0.304 | −0.33 | −0.27 | 127,912 | 4,390 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| District of Columbia, DC | 94.5 | −0.721 | −0.73 | −0.72 | 335,909 | 41,702 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Alachua, FL | 63.8 | −0.423 | −0.44 | −0.40 | 140,676 | 6,112 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Baker, FL | 14.6 | +0.526 | +0.38 | +0.67 | 13,948 | 170 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Bay, FL | 27.9 | +0.438 | +0.39 | +0.48 | 91,711 | 2,078 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Bradford, FL | 23.4 | +0.307 | +0.13 | +0.49 | 13,494 | 142 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Brevard, FL | 41.7 | +0.070 | +0.05 | +0.09 | 356,432 | 8,999 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Broward, FL | 65.0 | −0.270 | −0.28 | −0.26 | 952,161 | 25,659 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Calhoun, FL | 18.6 | +0.478 | +0.26 | +0.70 | 6,483 | 69 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Charlotte, FL | 36.6 | +0.151 | +0.11 | +0.19 | 115,516 | 3,209 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Citrus, FL | 29.3 | +0.124 | +0.07 | +0.18 | 92,444 | 1,865 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Clay, FL | 31.2 | +0.221 | +0.17 | +0.27 | 122,797 | 2,128 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Collier, FL | 37.6 | +0.267 | +0.24 | +0.29 | 206,571 | 8,751 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Columbia, FL | 27.2 | +0.343 | +0.25 | +0.43 | 32,750 | 513 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| DeSoto, FL | 33.9 | +0.402 | +0.25 | +0.56 | 12,572 | 185 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Dixie, FL | 16.8 | +0.442 | +0.24 | +0.65 | 8,124 | 93 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Duval, FL | 51.9 | +0.069 | +0.05 | +0.09 | 486,318 | 10,369 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Escambia, FL | 42.3 | +0.203 | +0.17 | +0.24 | 167,603 | 3,450 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Flagler, FL | 39.5 | −0.017 | −0.07 | +0.04 | 71,204 | 1,769 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Franklin, FL | 31.2 | −0.284 | −0.42 | −0.14 | 6,795 | 183 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Gadsden, FL | 68.4 | −0.013 | −0.11 | +0.08 | 23,618 | 483 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Gilchrist, FL | 17.7 | +0.239 | +0.05 | +0.43 | 9,595 | 119 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Glades, FL | 26.8 | +0.373 | +0.19 | +0.56 | 5,167 | 101 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Gulf, FL | 24.5 | +0.463 | +0.29 | +0.64 | 8,098 | 135 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Hamilton, FL | 34.0 | +0.446 | +0.20 | +0.70 | 5,778 | 66 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Hardee, FL | 27.3 | +0.714 | +0.59 | +0.84 | 8,420 | 164 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Hendry, FL | 38.4 | +0.509 | +0.41 | +0.60 | 12,835 | 306 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Hernando, FL | 34.8 | +0.124 | +0.07 | +0.18 | 107,931 | 1,858 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Highlands, FL | 32.7 | +0.321 | +0.25 | +0.39 | 51,811 | 967 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Hillsborough, FL | 53.5 | −0.074 | −0.09 | −0.06 | 703,765 | 18,101 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Holmes, FL | 10.3 | +0.746 | +0.50 | +0.99 | 9,004 | 58 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Indian River, FL | 39.1 | +0.246 | +0.21 | +0.28 | 96,716 | 3,511 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Jackson, FL | 30.4 | +0.352 | +0.24 | +0.46 | 22,254 | 322 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Jefferson, FL | 46.5 | +0.070 | −0.06 | +0.20 | 8,376 | 227 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Lafayette, FL | 14.0 | +0.374 | +0.14 | +0.61 | 3,638 | 56 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Lake, FL | 39.9 | +0.099 | +0.06 | +0.13 | 209,364 | 4,216 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Lee, FL | 40.3 | +0.109 | +0.09 | +0.13 | 390,942 | 10,970 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Leon, FL | 64.3 | −0.193 | −0.21 | −0.18 | 160,970 | 8,772 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Levy, FL | 27.0 | +0.152 | +0.04 | +0.26 | 22,954 | 370 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Liberty, FL | 19.6 | +0.541 | +0.27 | +0.81 | 3,540 | 37 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Madison, FL | 40.2 | +0.170 | −0.01 | +0.35 | 9,323 | 114 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Manatee, FL | 41.9 | −0.049 | −0.08 | −0.02 | 215,153 | 6,414 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Marion, FL | 36.9 | +0.143 | +0.11 | +0.18 | 202,684 | 4,176 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Martin, FL | 37.6 | +0.185 | +0.15 | +0.22 | 98,061 | 3,874 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Miami-Dade, FL | 53.7 | −0.211 | −0.22 | −0.20 | 1,150,697 | 32,297 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Monroe, FL | 46.0 | −0.146 | −0.19 | −0.10 | 47,574 | 2,331 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Nassau, FL | 26.8 | +0.165 | +0.11 | +0.22 | 58,130 | 1,562 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Okaloosa, FL | 30.0 | +0.471 | +0.43 | +0.52 | 114,046 | 2,325 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Okeechobee, FL | 27.7 | +0.428 | +0.29 | +0.56 | 15,860 | 213 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Orange, FL | 61.7 | −0.112 | −0.13 | −0.10 | 640,412 | 15,210 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Osceola, FL | 57.0 | −0.081 | −0.13 | −0.03 | 170,777 | 1,721 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Palm Beach, FL | 56.4 | −0.138 | −0.15 | −0.13 | 768,283 | 30,149 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Pasco, FL | 39.9 | +0.041 | +0.01 | +0.07 | 298,694 | 4,933 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Pinellas, FL | 50.1 | −0.165 | −0.18 | −0.15 | 553,659 | 17,100 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Polk, FL | 42.7 | +0.222 | +0.19 | +0.25 | 339,635 | 5,874 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Putnam, FL | 29.2 | +0.128 | +0.04 | +0.21 | 36,041 | 655 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| St. Johns, FL | 36.5 | +0.118 | +0.09 | +0.15 | 174,796 | 4,993 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| St. Lucie, FL | 49.2 | −0.028 | −0.07 | +0.01 | 170,968 | 3,325 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Santa Rosa, FL | 26.3 | +0.347 | +0.29 | +0.40 | 104,997 | 1,659 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Sarasota, FL | 44.7 | −0.192 | −0.21 | −0.17 | 268,480 | 12,109 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Seminole, FL | 51.4 | −0.005 | −0.03 | +0.02 | 257,769 | 5,947 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Sumter, FL | 31.9 | +0.149 | +0.10 | +0.19 | 92,102 | 2,913 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Suwannee, FL | 21.5 | +0.319 | +0.20 | +0.44 | 20,895 | 308 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Taylor, FL | 22.9 | +0.363 | +0.20 | +0.53 | 10,050 | 151 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Union, FL | 17.0 | +0.485 | +0.23 | +0.74 | 6,186 | 51 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Volusia, FL | 42.9 | +0.030 | +0.01 | +0.05 | 304,396 | 7,428 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Wakulla, FL | 29.4 | −0.147 | −0.27 | −0.03 | 18,225 | 269 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Walton, FL | 23.9 | +0.292 | +0.22 | +0.36 | 43,285 | 993 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Washington, FL | 19.2 | +0.529 | +0.39 | +0.67 | 12,223 | 173 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Appling, GA | 21.4 | +1.015 | +0.81 | +1.22 | 8,354 | 60 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Atkinson, GA | 26.4 | +0.801 | +0.42 | +1.18 | 3,125 | 26 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Bacon, GA | 13.5 | +0.679 | +0.40 | +0.96 | 4,642 | 44 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Baldwin, GA | 50.7 | +0.295 | +0.17 | +0.42 | 18,043 | 304 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Banks, GA | 10.7 | +0.418 | +0.04 | +0.80 | 8,727 | 47 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Barrow, GA | 28.1 | +0.447 | +0.31 | +0.58 | 37,257 | 316 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Bartow, GA | 24.3 | +0.503 | +0.40 | +0.60 | 49,763 | 515 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Ben Hill, GA | 36.8 | +0.468 | +0.21 | +0.72 | 6,504 | 69 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Berrien, GA | 16.5 | +0.901 | +0.68 | +1.12 | 7,688 | 66 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Bibb, GA | 62.0 | +0.229 | +0.18 | +0.28 | 69,967 | 1,508 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Bleckley, GA | 23.3 | +0.430 | +0.09 | +0.77 | 5,641 | 42 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Brantley, GA | 9.1 | +0.250 | −0.10 | +0.60 | 7,693 | 39 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Brooks, GA | 39.6 | +0.718 | +0.48 | +0.96 | 7,052 | 75 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Bryan, GA | 32.1 | +0.295 | +0.15 | +0.44 | 20,978 | 268 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Bulloch, GA | 38.0 | +0.347 | +0.25 | +0.44 | 29,635 | 482 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Burke, GA | 49.1 | +0.818 | +0.58 | +1.05 | 10,608 | 69 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Butts, GA | 28.0 | +0.868 | +0.68 | +1.06 | 11,680 | 104 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Camden, GA | 34.3 | +0.303 | +0.18 | +0.43 | 23,216 | 330 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Candler, GA | 28.8 | +0.353 | +0.12 | +0.59 | 4,402 | 91 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Carroll, GA | 30.2 | +0.397 | +0.31 | +0.48 | 53,712 | 696 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Catoosa, GA | 21.6 | +0.313 | +0.17 | +0.46 | 32,099 | 264 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Charlton, GA | 24.4 | +0.423 | +0.14 | +0.71 | 4,524 | 55 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Chatham, GA | 59.5 | −0.017 | −0.05 | +0.02 | 131,479 | 3,489 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Chattooga, GA | 18.7 | +0.322 | +0.03 | +0.61 | 9,918 | 59 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Cherokee, GA | 30.0 | +0.207 | +0.16 | +0.26 | 142,364 | 2,404 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Clarke, GA | 71.4 | −0.431 | −0.47 | −0.39 | 50,505 | 2,075 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Clayton, GA | 85.8 | −0.408 | −0.47 | −0.35 | 111,277 | 1,006 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Clinch, GA | 26.1 | +0.783 | +0.53 | +1.04 | 2,849 | 44 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Cobb, GA | 57.3 | −0.002 | −0.03 | +0.02 | 387,283 | 9,997 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Coffee, GA | 29.9 | +0.705 | +0.57 | +0.84 | 15,089 | 182 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Colquitt, GA | 26.2 | +0.942 | +0.85 | +1.04 | 15,967 | 240 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Columbia, GA | 36.9 | +0.332 | +0.26 | +0.40 | 79,245 | 1,093 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Cook, GA | 29.6 | +0.836 | +0.61 | +1.06 | 6,959 | 59 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Coweta, GA | 32.0 | +0.272 | +0.19 | +0.35 | 75,711 | 1,010 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Crawford, GA | 26.7 | +0.840 | +0.56 | +1.12 | 6,043 | 42 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Crisp, GA | 37.4 | +0.759 | +0.60 | +0.92 | 7,967 | 118 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Dade, GA | 17.2 | +0.486 | +0.23 | +0.74 | 7,327 | 86 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Dawson, GA | 15.7 | +0.544 | +0.36 | +0.72 | 15,884 | 162 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Decatur, GA | 41.4 | +0.636 | +0.47 | +0.80 | 11,537 | 124 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| DeKalb, GA | 84.1 | −0.672 | −0.69 | −0.66 | 366,539 | 12,992 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Dodge, GA | 27.1 | +0.681 | +0.48 | +0.88 | 8,015 | 79 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Dooly, GA | 47.0 | +0.611 | +0.35 | +0.87 | 4,070 | 44 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Dougherty, GA | 70.2 | +0.364 | +0.28 | +0.45 | 35,009 | 504 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Douglas, GA | 62.7 | −0.042 | −0.12 | +0.04 | 68,268 | 835 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Early, GA | 47.5 | +0.634 | +0.32 | +0.95 | 5,160 | 33 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Effingham, GA | 24.8 | +0.411 | +0.25 | +0.57 | 31,079 | 220 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Elbert, GA | 31.6 | +0.369 | +0.16 | +0.58 | 9,105 | 108 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Emanuel, GA | 30.6 | +0.529 | +0.31 | +0.75 | 9,439 | 85 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Evans, GA | 31.4 | +0.712 | +0.45 | +0.98 | 4,212 | 50 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Fannin, GA | 17.4 | +0.146 | 0.00 | +0.29 | 14,739 | 288 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Fayette, GA | 46.6 | +0.001 | −0.06 | +0.06 | 71,018 | 1,629 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Floyd, GA | 29.2 | +0.419 | +0.33 | +0.50 | 40,823 | 703 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Forsyth, GA | 33.1 | +0.281 | +0.23 | +0.33 | 127,331 | 2,008 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Franklin, GA | 14.9 | +0.628 | +0.39 | +0.86 | 10,662 | 84 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Fulton, GA | 73.5 | −0.264 | −0.28 | −0.25 | 517,459 | 23,387 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Gilmer, GA | 17.9 | +0.259 | +0.11 | +0.40 | 16,361 | 278 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Glynn, GA | 38.3 | +0.220 | +0.15 | +0.29 | 41,499 | 1,112 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Gordon, GA | 18.4 | +0.631 | +0.49 | +0.77 | 23,789 | 264 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Grady, GA | 34.0 | +0.452 | +0.23 | +0.68 | 10,653 | 90 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Greene, GA | 36.6 | +0.638 | +0.49 | +0.79 | 11,153 | 195 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Gwinnett, GA | 59.3 | −0.099 | −0.13 | −0.07 | 408,394 | 6,263 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Habersham, GA | 17.6 | +0.360 | +0.23 | +0.49 | 20,199 | 296 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Hall, GA | 28.1 | +0.481 | +0.42 | +0.54 | 89,216 | 1,599 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Hancock, GA | 72.1 | −0.129 | −0.53 | +0.27 | 4,130 | 32 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Haralson, GA | 12.7 | +0.851 | +0.65 | +1.05 | 14,121 | 126 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Harris, GA | 27.6 | +0.407 | +0.27 | +0.55 | 19,776 | 272 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Hart, GA | 25.0 | +0.642 | +0.48 | +0.80 | 12,622 | 167 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Heard, GA | 15.4 | +0.764 | +0.33 | +1.20 | 5,343 | 27 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Henry, GA | 60.3 | −0.158 | −0.22 | −0.10 | 121,702 | 1,450 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Houston, GA | 43.7 | +0.442 | +0.37 | +0.51 | 73,779 | 1,040 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Irwin, GA | 24.3 | +0.964 | +0.75 | +1.18 | 4,142 | 46 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Jackson, GA | 20.6 | +0.386 | +0.28 | +0.50 | 37,144 | 460 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Jasper, GA | 23.2 | +0.697 | +0.44 | +0.95 | 7,583 | 67 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Jeff Davis, GA | 18.0 | +0.571 | +0.17 | +0.97 | 5,723 | 29 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Jefferson, GA | 53.4 | +0.538 | +0.23 | +0.84 | 7,595 | 47 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Jenkins, GA | 36.9 | +0.967 | +0.65 | +1.28 | 3,427 | 25 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Jones, GA | 32.9 | +0.316 | +0.12 | +0.51 | 14,822 | 136 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Lamar, GA | 29.3 | +0.266 | +0.02 | +0.51 | 8,951 | 96 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Lanier, GA | 28.9 | +0.307 | 0.00 | +0.61 | 3,528 | 37 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Laurens, GA | 35.8 | +0.670 | +0.55 | +0.79 | 22,567 | 274 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Lee, GA | 27.5 | +0.552 | +0.37 | +0.74 | 16,565 | 130 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Liberty, GA | 62.2 | −0.023 | −0.16 | +0.12 | 21,063 | 230 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Lincoln, GA | 31.1 | +0.570 | +0.17 | +0.97 | 4,605 | 34 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Long, GA | 36.6 | −0.332 | −0.72 | +0.05 | 5,562 | 29 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Lowndes, GA | 43.9 | +0.417 | +0.32 | +0.51 | 45,808 | 565 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Lumpkin, GA | 20.4 | −0.050 | −0.19 | +0.09 | 15,289 | 266 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| McDuffie, GA | 40.3 | +0.679 | +0.47 | +0.88 | 10,337 | 100 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| McIntosh, GA | 39.4 | +0.122 | −0.12 | +0.37 | 6,628 | 90 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Macon, GA | 61.6 | +0.760 | +0.45 | +1.07 | 4,641 | 40 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Madison, GA | 23.1 | +0.092 | −0.13 | +0.31 | 14,737 | 119 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Meriwether, GA | 39.7 | +0.555 | +0.27 | +0.84 | 10,811 | 73 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Mitchell, GA | 44.7 | +0.720 | +0.55 | +0.89 | 8,928 | 99 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Monroe, GA | 28.4 | +0.417 | +0.26 | +0.58 | 15,442 | 176 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Montgomery, GA | 24.9 | +0.893 | +0.66 | +1.13 | 3,940 | 44 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Morgan, GA | 28.9 | +0.372 | +0.21 | +0.53 | 11,584 | 195 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Murray, GA | 15.1 | +0.465 | +0.21 | +0.72 | 15,245 | 82 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Muscogee, GA | 62.2 | +0.156 | +0.10 | +0.21 | 79,553 | 1,535 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Newton, GA | 55.5 | +0.081 | −0.02 | +0.18 | 53,658 | 526 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Oconee, GA | 33.0 | +0.016 | −0.07 | +0.10 | 24,757 | 686 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Oglethorpe, GA | 30.4 | −0.147 | −0.41 | +0.11 | 8,031 | 77 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Paulding, GA | 35.3 | +0.186 | +0.10 | +0.27 | 84,212 | 798 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Peach, GA | 47.7 | +0.333 | +0.16 | +0.50 | 12,428 | 186 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Pickens, GA | 16.7 | +0.305 | +0.16 | +0.45 | 16,934 | 285 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Pierce, GA | 12.2 | +0.836 | +0.66 | +1.02 | 8,998 | 91 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Pike, GA | 14.2 | +0.601 | +0.34 | +0.86 | 10,632 | 85 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Polk, GA | 21.2 | +0.611 | +0.42 | +0.80 | 17,244 | 136 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Pulaski, GA | 30.4 | +0.739 | +0.49 | +0.99 | 4,045 | 53 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Putnam, GA | 29.4 | +0.608 | +0.46 | +0.75 | 11,739 | 223 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Rabun, GA | 21.0 | +0.041 | −0.12 | +0.20 | 9,458 | 200 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Richmond, GA | 68.8 | +0.211 | +0.15 | +0.27 | 85,899 | 1,340 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Rockdale, GA | 70.6 | −0.295 | −0.40 | −0.19 | 44,251 | 477 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Screven, GA | 40.5 | +0.750 | +0.51 | +0.99 | 6,576 | 64 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Seminole, GA | 32.5 | +0.540 | +0.19 | +0.89 | 3,869 | 34 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Spalding, GA | 39.5 | +0.345 | +0.21 | +0.48 | 29,932 | 331 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Stephens, GA | 20.3 | +0.716 | +0.53 | +0.90 | 11,753 | 115 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Sumter, GA | 52.4 | +0.295 | +0.14 | +0.45 | 12,047 | 183 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Talbot, GA | 60.3 | +0.082 | −0.33 | +0.49 | 3,506 | 31 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Tattnall, GA | 25.4 | +0.881 | +0.71 | +1.05 | 8,116 | 82 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Taylor, GA | 36.4 | +0.567 | +0.26 | +0.87 | 3,808 | 29 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Telfair, GA | 34.5 | +0.674 | +0.32 | +1.02 | 4,313 | 29 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Terrell, GA | 54.2 | +0.656 | +0.37 | +0.94 | 4,380 | 42 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Thomas, GA | 40.2 | +0.598 | +0.50 | +0.70 | 21,677 | 402 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Tift, GA | 33.0 | +0.834 | +0.74 | +0.92 | 16,102 | 319 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Toombs, GA | 27.2 | +0.758 | +0.63 | +0.88 | 10,811 | 186 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Towns, GA | 19.5 | +0.241 | +0.07 | +0.42 | 7,934 | 183 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Troup, GA | 39.0 | +0.537 | +0.42 | +0.66 | 29,719 | 324 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Turner, GA | 37.5 | +0.496 | +0.17 | +0.82 | 3,758 | 39 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Twiggs, GA | 46.3 | +0.551 | +0.21 | +0.90 | 4,414 | 26 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Union, GA | 18.1 | +0.120 | −0.02 | +0.26 | 15,450 | 271 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Upson, GA | 32.8 | +0.586 | +0.37 | +0.80 | 12,809 | 102 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Walker, GA | 19.9 | +0.435 | +0.29 | +0.58 | 28,943 | 265 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Walton, GA | 25.1 | +0.524 | +0.41 | +0.63 | 50,522 | 481 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Ware, GA | 29.6 | +0.631 | +0.51 | +0.75 | 14,072 | 231 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Washington, GA | 50.4 | +0.677 | +0.49 | +0.86 | 9,411 | 117 | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors |
| Wayne, GA | 21.2 | +0.674 | +0.50 | +0.85 | 12,675 | 127 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| White, GA | 16.5 | +0.145 | −0.01 | +0.30 | 14,633 | 232 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Whitfield, GA | 29.4 | +0.494 | +0.40 | +0.59 | 36,324 | 474 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Wilcox, GA | 26.4 | +0.962 | +0.64 | +1.28 | 3,263 | 25 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Wilkes, GA | 43.3 | +0.409 | +0.18 | +0.64 | 4,983 | 94 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Wilkinson, GA | 43.8 | +0.297 | −0.06 | +0.65 | 4,739 | 37 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Worth, GA | 26.0 | +0.880 | +0.70 | +1.06 | 9,225 | 99 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Ada, ID | 48.0 | −0.214 | −0.24 | −0.19 | 251,238 | 7,720 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Adams, ID | 23.3 | +0.221 | −0.10 | +0.55 | 2,532 | 56 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Bannock, ID | 38.6 | −0.238 | −0.32 | −0.16 | 38,013 | 720 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Bear Lake, ID | 10.7 | +0.746 | +0.39 | +1.10 | 3,264 | 36 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Benewah, ID | 20.1 | +0.209 | −0.06 | +0.47 | 4,855 | 80 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Bingham, ID | 21.2 | +0.483 | +0.32 | +0.65 | 19,419 | 187 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Blaine, ID | 68.9 | −0.475 | −0.53 | −0.42 | 12,950 | 1,017 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Boise, ID | 25.7 | +0.125 | −0.10 | +0.35 | 4,689 | 110 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Bonner, ID | 31.1 | −0.076 | −0.16 | +0.01 | 26,679 | 758 | Republican vote, left-leaning donors |
| Bonneville, ID | 27.4 | +0.152 | +0.08 | +0.22 | 52,059 | 955 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
| Boundary, ID | 19.8 | +0.304 | +0.10 | +0.51 | 6,157 | 134 | Vote and donors lean the same way |
Showing the first 500 of 2839 rows.
A straight line fitted through the county dots by least squares, which minimizes the squared vertical distances, crosses zero at a Democratic share of 45.9%45.9% percent Democratic, two-party voteEstimandvote share at which a least-squares line of donor lean crosses zeron2,839Weightsnone (each county counted once)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME when each county counts once and 44.5%44.5% percent Democratic, two-party voteEstimandvote share at which a least-squares line of donor lean crosses zeron2,839Weightstwo-party votes in 2020 (county-equal in the companion fact)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME when counties are weighted by their votes. A county at an even split of the vote is expected to have donors a little left of zero, and 7676 countiesEstimandcount with a Democratic share at or above the point where the county-equal fitted line crosses zero, as printed (45.9%)n472Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationRepublican-voting counties with left-leaning donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of the 472472 countiesEstimandcount of Republican-voting counties with a left-leaning donor pooln2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME Republican-voting counties with left-leaning donors have a Democratic share at or above the first crossing. The median Democratic-voting county with right-leaning donors gave 57.6%57.6% percent Democratic, two-party voteEstimandmedian county Democratic sharen98Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with right-leaning donorsPeriod2020SourceCounty election returns of its two-party vote to the Democratic candidate.
Democratic-voting exceptions are counties with large Black populations
7474 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn98Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors that are at least 30% BlackPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of the 9898 countiesEstimandcount of Democratic-voting counties with a right-leaning donor pooln2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME Democratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors are at least 30%30% percent of residents, non-Hispanic BlackEstimanddefinition of a groupWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties grouped as at least 30% BlackPeriod2020SourceCounty demographics panel Black. Among Democratic-voting counties at that Black share, 58.7%58.7% percent of countiesEstimandshare with a right-leaning donor pooln126Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties in that frame with a Black share, a college share and a median income, at least 30% BlackPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME (7474 countiesEstimandcount with a right-leaning donor pooln126Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties in that frame with a Black share, a college share and a median income, at least 30% BlackPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of 126126 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn126Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties in that frame with a Black share, a college share and a median income, at least 30% BlackPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME) have right-leaning donors, against 6.5%6.5% percent of countiesEstimandshare with a right-leaning donor pooln372Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties in that frame with a Black share, a college share and a median income, under 30% BlackPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of the 372372 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn372Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties in that frame with a Black share, a college share and a median income, under 30% BlackPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME others (Figure 3). Pools are smaller in these counties, and a small pool gives a noisy mean. The median Democratic-voting county at least 30%30% percent of residents, non-Hispanic BlackEstimanddefinition of a groupWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties grouped as at least 30% BlackPeriod2020SourceCounty demographics panel Black has 170170 reliable donorsEstimandmedian pool sizen126Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties in that frame with a Black share, a college share and a median income, at least 30% BlackPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME reliable donors, against 3,1933,193 reliable donorsEstimandmedian pool sizen372Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties in that frame with a Black share, a college share and a median income, under 30% BlackPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME in the others. The gap between the two groups of counties remains when small pools are dropped (Figure 4).The Black share analyses use the 498498 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn498Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties in that frame with a Black share, a college share and a median incomePeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME Democratic-voting counties that have a Black share, a college share and a median household income in the 2020 demographic file. The counties of Connecticut lack all three there and drop out of these analyses only. Regression standard errors are clustered on the 4646 statesEstimandnumber of states, the clusters of the regressionsn46Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties in that frame with a Black share, a college share and a median incomePeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME states in this set.
Figure 3
Right-leaning donors are more common in Democratic-voting counties that are at least 30% Black: 58.7% of them, against 6.5% of the rest
Share of counties whose donor pool leans opposite to the vote, by non-Hispanic Black share of residents, for Democratic-voting and Republican-voting counties, 2020 vote
- Democratic-voting counties
- Republican-voting counties
Show data
| Black share of residents | Vote | Divergent counties (% of counties voting that way) | Divergent counties | Counties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 5% Black | Democratic-voting counties | 6.9 | 14 | 202 |
| 5 to 15% Black | Democratic-voting counties | 2.8 | 3 | 108 |
| 15 to 30% Black | Democratic-voting counties | 11.3 | 7 | 62 |
| 30 to 50% Black | Democratic-voting counties | 43.9 | 25 | 57 |
| 50% or more Black | Democratic-voting counties | 71.0 | 49 | 69 |
| Under 5% Black | Republican-voting counties | 23.4 | 372 | 1,593 |
| 5 to 15% Black | Republican-voting counties | 20.6 | 81 | 393 |
| 15 to 30% Black | Republican-voting counties | 5.6 | 12 | 214 |
| 30 to 50% Black | Republican-voting counties | 3.8 | 5 | 131 |
Figure 4
At every pool floor, a larger share of Democratic-voting counties at least 30% Black than of the rest have right-leaning donors
Share of Democratic-voting counties whose donor pool leans right, by whether the county is at least 30% Black, among counties with at least the stated number of reliable donors, 2020 vote
- Counties at least 30% Black
- Other Democratic-voting counties
Show data
| Counties with at least | Group | Counties with right-leaning donors (%) | Counties with right-leaning donors | Counties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 or more donors | Counties at least 30% Black | 58.7 | 74 | 126 |
| 25 or more donors | Other Democratic-voting counties | 6.5 | 24 | 372 |
| 100 or more donors | Counties at least 30% Black | 43.9 | 36 | 82 |
| 100 or more donors | Other Democratic-voting counties | 4.8 | 17 | 357 |
| 500 or more donors | Counties at least 30% Black | 30.2 | 13 | 43 |
| 500 or more donors | Other Democratic-voting counties | 4.1 | 13 | 320 |
Among the 498498 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn498Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties in that frame with a Black share, a college share and a median incomePeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME Democratic-voting counties with a Black share, the correlation between donor lean and Black share is +0.62 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.69)+0.62 correlation coefficientEstimandcorrelation of county donor lean and Black shareInterval95% CI 0.55 to 0.69n498Weightsnone (each county counted once)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties in that frame with a Black share, a college share and a median incomePeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIMENoteCounty bootstrap, 2000 replicates, seed 12345. when each county counts once and +0.21 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.37)+0.21 correlation coefficientEstimandcorrelation of county donor lean and Black shareInterval95% CI 0.07 to 0.37n498Weightstwo-party votes in 2020 (county-equal in the companion fact)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties in that frame with a Black share, a college share and a median incomePeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIMENoteCounty bootstrap, 2000 replicates, seed 12345. when counties are weighted by their votes (Figure 5). Both intervals lie above zero, and the weighted correlation is smaller. 99 countiesEstimandcount with a left-leaning donor pooln10Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationthe 10 counties at least 30% Black with the most two-party votes among Democratic-voting counties in that frame with a Black share, a college share and a median incomePeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of the 1010 countiesEstimandsize of the group comparedWeightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties in that frame with a Black share, a college share and a median income, at least 30% Black, the ones with the most two-party votesPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME counties at least 30%30% percent of residents, non-Hispanic BlackEstimanddefinition of a groupWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties grouped as at least 30% BlackPeriod2020SourceCounty demographics panel Black with the most voters, among them Philadelphia, Prince George's County in Maryland and Fulton County in Georgia, have donors left of zero, and the exception is Jefferson County in Alabama. The Democratic-voting counties at least 30%30% percent of residents, non-Hispanic BlackEstimanddefinition of a groupWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties grouped as at least 30% BlackPeriod2020SourceCounty demographics panel Black with right-leaning donors have a median of 10,80410,804 two-party votesEstimandmedian county two-party votesn74Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties in that frame with a Black share, a college share and a median income, at least 30% Black, with right-leaning donorsPeriod2020SourceCounty election returns two-party votes, against 73,87273,872 two-party votesEstimandmedian county two-party votesn52Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties in that frame with a Black share, a college share and a median income, at least 30% Black, with left-leaning donorsPeriod2020SourceCounty election returns for those with left-leaning donors.
A regression of donor lean on Black share fits a straight line and reports how far donor lean moves for each 10 points10 points percentage points of Black share or college shareEstimandscale of the regression coefficientsWeightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties in that frame with a Black share, a college share and a median incomePeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of Black share (Figure 6). With standard errors clusteredClustered standard errorsStandard errors that allow answers within the same group, such as the same county or the same week, to be related. They are wider than ordinary errors when members of a group resemble each other. by state, the coefficient stays above zero after adjusting for college share and median household income when each county counts once, and its interval includes zero when counties are weighted by their votes. A higher college share goes with a more left-leaning donor pool in both weightings.
Figure 6
The adjusted Black share slope is above zero when each county counts once and includes zero when counties are weighted by votes
Regression coefficients of county donor lean, per 10 points of Black share or college share, Democratic-voting counties (n = 498), 95% intervals from standard errors clustered on state
- Each county counted once
- Weighted by two-party votes
Show data
| Measure | Weighting | Change in donor lean per 10 points | 95% interval, low | 95% interval, high | Counties |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Black share, alone | Each county counted once | +0.101 | +0.077 | +0.125 | 498 |
| Black share, alone | Weighted by two-party votes | +0.040 | +0.005 | +0.075 | 498 |
| Black share, adjusted | Each county counted once | +0.068 | +0.042 | +0.094 | 498 |
| Black share, adjusted | Weighted by two-party votes | +0.028 | −0.006 | +0.062 | 498 |
| College share, adjusted | Each county counted once | −0.120 | −0.156 | −0.085 | 498 |
| College share, adjusted | Weighted by two-party votes | −0.108 | −0.154 | −0.061 | 498 |
Counties with a large Black share are not the only ones. 1010 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn98Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors that are under 30% Black and majority HispanicPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of the Democratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors are at least 50%50% percent of residents, HispanicEstimanddefinition of a groupWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties grouped as majority HispanicPeriod2020SourceCounty demographics panel Hispanic and under 30%30% percent of residents, non-Hispanic BlackEstimanddefinition of a groupWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties grouped as at least 30% BlackPeriod2020SourceCounty demographics panel Black, 88 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn10Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationthose majority-Hispanic counties that are in TexasPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of them in Texas, mostly in South Texas. Of the other 1414 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn98Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors that are neitherPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME, 99 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn14Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors that are neither, with a Democratic share below the upper cutPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME have a Democratic share below 55%55% percent Democratic, two-party voteEstimanddefinition of a map classWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationupper cut of the mapPeriod2020SourceCounty election returns, such as Tarrant County in Texas, which voted almost evenly and has a donor lean close to zero.
Figure 7 names the counties at the two ends, among counties with at least 7575 reliable donorsEstimandminimum pool for a county to be rankedWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties named in the tablePeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME reliable donors. The Democratic-voting counties with the most right-leaning donors are mostly Mississippi counties, with counties in Georgia and Louisiana. Education and income gradients in the donor pool and in the vote are compared in Chapter 14.2, The geography of donations (planned).
Figure 7
Mississippi holds 7 of the 10 Democratic-voting counties with the most right-leaning donors
The 10 Democratic-voting counties with the highest mean CFscore of reliable donors and the 10 Republican-voting counties with the lowest, among counties with a pool large enough to rank, 2020 vote
- Democratic vote, right-leaning donors
- Republican vote, left-leaning donors
Show data
| County | Group | Democratic share (%) | Donor lean (mean CFscore) | 95% interval, low | 95% interval, high | Reliable donors | Black share (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yazoo, MS | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors | 53.2 | +0.84 | +0.66 | +1.03 | 92 | 56.9 |
| Sunflower, MS | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors | 70.8 | +0.71 | +0.51 | +0.91 | 77 | 73.3 |
| Washington, GA | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors | 50.4 | +0.68 | +0.49 | +0.86 | 117 | 53.0 |
| Leflore, MS | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors | 71.0 | +0.55 | +0.35 | +0.74 | 110 | 74.5 |
| Iberville Parish, LA | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors | 51.9 | +0.46 | +0.32 | +0.60 | 170 | 45.8 |
| Caddo Parish, LA | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors | 53.4 | +0.43 | +0.39 | +0.48 | 2,088 | 48.9 |
| Washington, MS | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors | 70.2 | +0.42 | +0.27 | +0.57 | 185 | 71.6 |
| Pike, MS | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors | 50.5 | +0.41 | +0.21 | +0.61 | 118 | 53.8 |
| Bolivar, MS | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors | 65.6 | +0.41 | +0.22 | +0.59 | 129 | 63.6 |
| Adams, MS | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors | 58.2 | +0.39 | +0.22 | +0.56 | 158 | 54.2 |
| Floyd, VA | Republican vote, left-leaning donors | 32.5 | −0.65 | −0.77 | −0.53 | 192 | 2.1 |
| Schuyler, NY | Republican vote, left-leaning donors | 41.0 | −0.61 | −0.71 | −0.50 | 232 | 0.9 |
| Jackson, OR | Republican vote, left-leaning donors | 48.2 | −0.60 | −0.63 | −0.58 | 4,773 | 0.7 |
| Tillamook, OR | Republican vote, left-leaning donors | 49.1 | −0.60 | −0.68 | −0.52 | 492 | 0.7 |
| Trinity, CA | Republican vote, left-leaning donors | 47.2 | −0.56 | −0.70 | −0.41 | 161 | 0.8 |
| Nelson, VA | Republican vote, left-leaning donors | 47.3 | −0.52 | −0.61 | −0.42 | 351 | 12.0 |
| Washington, ME | Republican vote, left-leaning donors | 39.9 | −0.51 | −0.61 | −0.42 | 372 | 0.6 |
| Madison, NC | Republican vote, left-leaning donors | 38.1 | −0.51 | −0.60 | −0.42 | 371 | 1.2 |
| Rice, MN | Republican vote, left-leaning donors | 49.9 | −0.51 | −0.57 | −0.44 | 842 | 6.2 |
| St. Lawrence, NY | Republican vote, left-leaning donors | 44.0 | −0.50 | −0.57 | −0.44 | 865 | 2.2 |
Pool size moves the two sides in opposite directions
Figure 8 groups counties by the number of reliable donors. The share of Democratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors falls from 78.6%78.6% percent of countiesEstimandshare with a right-leaning donor pooln28Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with 25 to 49 reliable donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME in the smallest pools to 6.3%6.3% percent of countiesEstimandshare with a right-leaning donor pooln318Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with 1,000 or more reliable donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME in the largest, and the share of Republican-voting counties with left-leaning donors rises from 12.9%12.9% percent of countiesEstimandshare with a left-leaning donor pooln318Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationRepublican-voting counties with 25 to 49 reliable donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME to 36.5%36.5% percent of countiesEstimandshare with a left-leaning donor pooln301Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationRepublican-voting counties with 1,000 or more reliable donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME. The median county in the analysis has 229229 reliable donorsEstimandmedian pool sizen2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME reliable donors, and the median Democratic-voting county with right-leaning donors has 117117 reliable donorsEstimandmedian pool sizen98Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with right-leaning donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME. 4545 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn98Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors and fewer than 100 reliable donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of the 9898 countiesEstimandcount of Democratic-voting counties with a right-leaning donor pooln2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME Democratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors have fewer than 100100 reliable donorsEstimandminimum poolWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationpool floor of a check on the Black share comparisonPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME reliable donors, so the average in those counties rests on few donors.
Figure 8
Democratic-voting counties diverge mostly in small pools, Republican-voting counties in large ones
Share of counties whose donor pool leans opposite to the vote, by number of reliable donors in the county, for Democratic-voting and Republican-voting counties, 2020 vote
- Democratic-voting counties
- Republican-voting counties
Show data
| Reliable donors in the county | Vote | Divergent counties (% of counties voting that way) | Divergent counties | Counties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 to 49 donors | Democratic-voting counties | 78.6 | 22 | 28 |
| 50 to 99 donors | Democratic-voting counties | 74.2 | 23 | 31 |
| 100 to 199 donors | Democratic-voting counties | 45.9 | 17 | 37 |
| 200 to 499 donors | Democratic-voting counties | 25.6 | 10 | 39 |
| 500 to 999 donors | Democratic-voting counties | 11.8 | 6 | 51 |
| 1,000 or more donors | Democratic-voting counties | 6.3 | 20 | 318 |
| 25 to 49 donors | Republican-voting counties | 12.9 | 41 | 318 |
| 50 to 99 donors | Republican-voting counties | 12.6 | 59 | 468 |
| 100 to 199 donors | Republican-voting counties | 12.8 | 57 | 445 |
| 200 to 499 donors | Republican-voting counties | 21.6 | 117 | 542 |
| 500 to 999 donors | Republican-voting counties | 33.7 | 88 | 261 |
| 1,000 or more donors | Republican-voting counties | 36.5 | 110 | 301 |
A small pool also gives a noisy mean. If each county's donors are a random draw from a larger set, the expected number of counties whose observed sign differs from the sign of the underlying mean is 138138 countiesEstimandexpected number of counties whose observed donor sign differs from the sign of the underlying donor meann2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIMENoteNormal model with the county standard error sd over the square root of n; flat prior. (4.9%4.9% percent of countiesEstimandexpected share of counties whose observed donor sign differs from the underlying signn2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME). Among the 570570 countiesEstimandcount of counties on the two off-diagonal sides of the sign rulen2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME divergent counties the expected number is 5656 countiesEstimandexpected number of divergent counties whose underlying donor sign is the aligned onen570Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationdivergent counties in the framePeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIMENoteNormal model with the county standard error; flat prior. (9.8%9.8% percent of divergent countiesEstimandexpected share of divergent counties whose underlying donor sign is the aligned onen570Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationdivergent counties in the framePeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME). That benchmark uses only each county's own donors and is a lower bound. A version that shrinks each county mean toward a straight line fitted through the county dots gives 8383 countiesEstimandexpected number of divergent counties whose underlying donor sign is the aligned one, county means shrunk toward a line in the Democratic sharen570Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationdivergent counties in the framePeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIMENoteNormal model; underlying county means scatter around a least-squares line in the Democratic share with standard deviation 0.27 (method of moments). (14.5%14.5% percent of divergent countiesEstimandexpected share of divergent counties whose underlying donor sign is the aligned one, county means shrunk toward a line in the Democratic sharen570Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationdivergent counties in the framePeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME), and the derivation of both is in the methods note. Noise of that size moves some counties across the line and leaves most divergent counties divergent. Noise is more likely to move the sign of a county in the group with a large Black share, where pools are smaller, and the comparison of shares at pool floors of 100100 reliable donorsEstimandminimum poolWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationpool floor of a check on the Black share comparisonPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME and 500500 reliable donorsEstimandminimum poolWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationpool floor of a check on the Black share comparisonPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME donors in Figure 4 is the check on this, and the gap remains.
Republican-voting exceptions are the less Republican counties
With zero as the neutral point, the Republican-voting counties with left-leaning donors are a larger group than the Democratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors (472472 countiesEstimandcount of Republican-voting counties with a left-leaning donor pooln2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME against 9898 countiesEstimandcount of Democratic-voting counties with a right-leaning donor pooln2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME), and the order reverses when the mean CFscore of all reliable donors is the neutral point (104104 countiesEstimandcount of Republican-voting counties with donor lean below the referencen2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties in the frame, with the donor lean measured from the mean of all reliable donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME against 240240 countiesEstimandcount of Democratic-voting counties with donor lean above the referencen2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties in the frame, with the donor lean measured from the mean of all reliable donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME). Their median county voted 38.4%38.4% percent Democratic, two-party voteEstimandmedian county Democratic sharen472Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationRepublican-voting counties with left-leaning donorsPeriod2020SourceCounty election returns Democratic, against 26.2%26.2% percent Democratic, two-party voteEstimandmedian county Democratic sharen1,863Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationRepublican-voting counties with right-leaning donorsPeriod2020SourceCounty election returns in the median Republican-voting county with right-leaning donors, and their median college share is 24.2%24.2% percent of adults 25 and over with a bachelor degreeEstimandmedian county college sharen472Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationRepublican-voting counties with left-leaning donorsPeriod2020SourceCounty demographics panel, against 19.6%19.6% percent of adults 25 and over with a bachelor degreeEstimandmedian county college sharen1,863Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationRepublican-voting counties with right-leaning donorsPeriod2020SourceCounty demographics panel. Figure 9 shows that the share of Republican-voting counties with left-leaning donors is highest in the Northeast and lowest in the South. Figure 7 lists the 1010 countiesEstimandlength of the listWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationeach list of named countiesPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME with the most left-leaning donors, in 77 statesEstimandnumber of statesn10Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationthe ten Republican-voting counties with the most left-leaning donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME states, and none is at least 30%30% percent of residents, non-Hispanic BlackEstimanddefinition of a groupWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties grouped as at least 30% BlackPeriod2020SourceCounty demographics panel Black. The size of this group depends on the donor definition and on the neutral point, as the next section shows.
Figure 9
Republican-voting counties with left-leaning donors are 63.5% of Northeast counties and 12.5% of Southern ones
Share of counties whose donor pool leans opposite to the vote, by Census region, for Republican-voting and Democratic-voting counties, 2020 vote
- Republican-voting counties
- Democratic-voting counties
Show data
| Region | Vote | Divergent counties (% of counties voting that way) | Divergent counties | Counties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northeast | Republican-voting counties | 63.5 | 73 | 115 |
| Northeast | Democratic-voting counties | 0.0 | 0 | 102 |
| West | Republican-voting counties | 27.8 | 76 | 273 |
| West | Democratic-voting counties | 5.1 | 6 | 117 |
| Midwest | Republican-voting counties | 22.1 | 184 | 832 |
| Midwest | Democratic-voting counties | 3.6 | 3 | 83 |
| South | Republican-voting counties | 12.5 | 139 | 1,115 |
| South | Democratic-voting counties | 44.1 | 89 | 202 |
The counts depend on the definition
Figure 10 repeats the count under other definitions. Changing the donor pool, the vote year or the pool floor moves the Democratic-voting group between 6262 countiesEstimandsmallest count of Democratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors across the five rowsWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationthe five definitions of the donor pool, the vote year and the pool floorPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME and 188188 countiesEstimandlargest count of Democratic-voting counties with right-leaning donors across the five rowsWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationthe five definitions of the donor pool, the vote year and the pool floorPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME counties and the Republican-voting group between 113113 countiesEstimandsmallest count of Republican-voting counties with left-leaning donors across the five rowsWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationthe five definitions of the donor pool, the vote year and the pool floorPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME and 542542 countiesEstimandlargest count of Republican-voting counties with left-leaning donors across the five rowsWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationthe five definitions of the donor pool, the vote year and the pool floorPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME. Moving the neutral point is a larger change. With the mean of all reliable donors (−0.274−0.274 CFscore units (negative is left)Estimandmean CFscore, each donor counted onceInterval95% CI −0.275 to −0.273n4,717,221Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationreliable donors in the donor filePeriod1980-2024SourceDIMENoteDonors are administrative records, so the interval treats them as independent draws.) the groups are 240240 countiesEstimandcount of Democratic-voting counties with donor lean above the referencen2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties in the frame, with the donor lean measured from the mean of all reliable donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME and 104104 countiesEstimandcount of Republican-voting counties with donor lean below the referencen2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties in the frame, with the donor lean measured from the mean of all reliable donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME, and with the median county (+0.19+0.19 CFscore units (negative is left)Estimandmedian of the county donor lean, each county counted oncen2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME) they are 5757 countiesEstimandcount of Democratic-voting counties with donor lean above the referencen2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties in the frame, with the donor lean measured from the median countyPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME and 973973 countiesEstimandcount of Republican-voting counties with donor lean below the referencen2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties in the frame, with the donor lean measured from the median countyPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME, which makes 36.3%36.3% percent of countiesEstimandshare of divergent countiesn2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties in the frame, with the donor lean measured from the median countyPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of counties divergent. Counting all donors with a score, which brings in donors with few recipients and donors whose score is inherited from a recipient, reverses the balance of the two groups, to 188188 countiesEstimandcount of Democratic-voting counties with a right-leaning pooln3,105Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with a pool and a return under all donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME and 113113 countiesEstimandcount of Republican-voting counties with a left-leaning pooln3,105Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with a pool and a return under all donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME on a set of 3,1053,105 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn3,105Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with a pool and a return under all donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME counties.
Figure 10
The number of divergent counties runs from 112 to 1,030 across the definitions tested
Counties whose donor pool leans opposite to the vote under the chapter's definition and under changes to the donor pool, the pool floor, the vote year, the neutral point of the donor scale and the divergence rule
| Definition | Divergent counties | Share of counties (%) | Democratic vote, right-leaning donors | Republican vote, left-leaning donors | Counties | Share of votes (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chapter definition | 570 | 20.1 | 98 | 472 | 2,839 | 16.0 |
| Donor pool: at least 15 distinct recipients | 617 | 25.4 | 75 | 542 | 2,432 | 18.3 |
| Donor pool: all donors with a CFscore | 301 | 9.7 | 188 | 113 | 3,105 | 18.3 |
| Vote year: 2024 | 590 | 20.8 | 68 | 522 | 2,835 | 22.6 |
| Pool floor: at least 75 donors per county | 462 | 20.9 | 62 | 400 | 2,212 | 16.0 |
| Neutral point: mean of all donors | 344 | 12.1 | 240 | 104 | 2,839 | 26.9 |
| Neutral point: median county | 1,030 | 36.3 | 57 | 973 | 2,839 | 24.5 |
| Divergence rule: both cut points cleared | 112 | 3.9 | 27 | 85 | 2,839 | 1.2 |
Show data
| counties | definition | dem_right | divergent | rep_left | share | share_votes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,839 | Chapter definition | 98 | 570 | 472 | 20.10 | 16 |
| 2,432 | Donor pool: at least 15 distinct recipients | 75 | 617 | 542 | 25.40 | 18.30 |
| 3,105 | Donor pool: all donors with a CFscore | 188 | 301 | 113 | 9.70 | 18.30 |
| 2,835 | Vote year: 2024 | 68 | 590 | 522 | 20.80 | 22.60 |
| 2,212 | Pool floor: at least 75 donors per county | 62 | 462 | 400 | 20.90 | 16 |
| 2,839 | Neutral point: mean of all donors | 240 | 344 | 104 | 12.10 | 26.90 |
| 2,839 | Neutral point: median county | 57 | 1030 | 973 | 36.30 | 24.50 |
| 2,839 | Divergence rule: both cut points cleared | 27 | 112 | 85 | 3.90 | 1.20 |
The Black share pattern survives the changes of donor definition when each county counts once. The correlation of donor lean with Black share among Democratic-voting counties is +0.60+0.60 correlation coefficientEstimandcorrelation of donor lean and Black sharen463Weightsnone (each county counted once)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with a 2020 Black share and at least 25 reliable donors, stricter donor definitionPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME with the stricter donor definition and +0.55+0.55 correlation coefficientEstimandcorrelation of donor lean and Black sharen528Weightsnone (each county counted once)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with a 2020 Black share and at least 25 reliable donors, all donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME with all donors. The vote-weighted correlation with all donors is +0.06+0.06 correlation coefficientEstimandcorrelation of donor lean and Black sharen528Weightstwo-party votes in 2020 (county-equal in the companion fact)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with a 2020 Black share and at least 25 reliable donors, all donorsPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME, close to zero. Both groups exist under every definition, and the number in each changes with the definition, so the counts in this chapter describe reliable donors with zero as the neutral point and should not be read as the number of counties where donors disagree with voters in general.
The Black share gap appears in every donor cohort
A donor's CFscore is fixed, so donors who first gave in different election cycles form groups with different average scores. Reliable donors who first gave in 1980 to 1996 average +0.228 (95% CI 0.225 to 0.230)+0.228 CFscore units (negative is left)Estimandmean CFscore, each donor counted onceInterval95% CI 0.225 to 0.230n422,794Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationreliable donors who first gave in 1980-96Perioddonors first active 1980-96SourceDIME, those who first gave in 1998 to 2008 average −0.081−0.081 CFscore units (negative is left)Estimandmean CFscore, each donor counted onceInterval95% CI −0.083 to −0.080n1,562,979Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationreliable donors who first gave in 1998-2008Perioddonors first active 1998-2008SourceDIME, and those who first gave in 2010 to 2016 and in 2018 to 2024 average −0.467−0.467 CFscore units (negative is left)Estimandmean CFscore, each donor counted onceInterval95% CI −0.469 to −0.465n1,249,312Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationreliable donors who first gave in 2010-16Perioddonors first active 2010-16SourceDIME and −0.457−0.457 CFscore units (negative is left)Estimandmean CFscore, each donor counted onceInterval95% CI −0.459 to −0.455n1,482,136Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationreliable donors who first gave in 2018-24Perioddonors first active 2018-24SourceDIME. Within each cohort, the difference in mean donor lean between Democratic-voting counties at least 30%30% percent of residents, non-Hispanic BlackEstimanddefinition of a groupWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties grouped as at least 30% BlackPeriod2020SourceCounty demographics panel Black and other Democratic-voting counties is 0.19 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.28)0.19 CFscore unitsEstimanddifference in mean county donor lean, counties at least 30% Black minus other Democratic-voting countiesInterval95% CI 0.10 to 0.28n385Weightsnone (each county counted once)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with 25 or more reliable donors who first gave in 1980-96Period2020 vote; donors first active 1980-96SourceDIMENoteNormal interval from the spread of county means within each group. CFscore units for donors who first gave in 1980 to 1996 and 0.32 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.40)0.32 CFscore unitsEstimanddifference in mean county donor lean, counties at least 30% Black minus other Democratic-voting countiesInterval95% CI 0.24 to 0.40n436Weightsnone (each county counted once)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with 25 or more reliable donors who first gave in 2018-24Period2020 vote; donors first active 2018-24SourceDIMENoteNormal interval from the spread of county means within each group. for 2018 to 2024, and every cohort's interval lies above zero (Figure 11). A county needs at least 2525 reliable donorsEstimanddefinition of the frame (minimum pool)Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME donors from the cohort to count, so the county set changes between cohorts. 5959 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn59Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties at least 30% Black with a pool in every cohortPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME of the 374374 countiesEstimandcount of countiesn374Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with 25 or more reliable donors in every cohortPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME Democratic-voting counties with a pool in every cohort are at least 30%30% percent of residents, non-Hispanic BlackEstimanddefinition of a groupWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties grouped as at least 30% BlackPeriod2020SourceCounty demographics panel Black, and in that fixed set the difference runs from 0.160.16 CFscore unitsEstimanddifference in mean county donor lean, counties at least 30% Black minus other Democratic-voting counties, smallest across the four cohortsInterval95% CI 0.06 to 0.26n374Weightsnone (each county counted once)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with 25 or more reliable donors in every cohortPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIMENoteNormal interval from the spread of county means within each group. to 0.310.31 CFscore unitsEstimanddifference in mean county donor lean, counties at least 30% Black minus other Democratic-voting counties, largest across the four cohortsInterval95% CI 0.21 to 0.42n374Weightsnone (each county counted once)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with 25 or more reliable donors in every cohortPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIMENoteNormal interval from the spread of county means within each group..Counting the counties whose cohort pool leans right mixes the gap with the difference between cohorts in where the whole pool sits. Among Democratic-voting counties at least 30%30% percent of residents, non-Hispanic BlackEstimanddefinition of a groupWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties grouped as at least 30% BlackPeriod2020SourceCounty demographics panel Black, 86.8%86.8% percent of countiesEstimandshare with a right-leaning cohort pooln68Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties at least 30% Black with 25 or more reliable donors who first gave in 1980-96Period2020 vote; donors first active 1980-96SourceDIME have a right-leaning pool for donors who first gave in 1980 to 1996 and 22.5%22.5% percent of countiesEstimandshare with a right-leaning cohort pooln80Weightsnone (full counts of counties)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties at least 30% Black with 25 or more reliable donors who first gave in 2018-24Period2020 vote; donors first active 2018-24SourceDIME for 2018 to 2024. The data table of the cohort figure gives all four cohorts.
Figure 11
Counties at least 30% Black sit to the right of other Democratic-voting counties in every donor cohort
Mean CFscore of reliable donors, or the difference between two groups of counties, by the election cycles in which donors first gave, Democratic-voting counties with a large Black share and other Democratic-voting counties, 2020 vote
- Counties at least 30% Black
- Other Democratic-voting counties
- All reliable donors
Show data
| County set | Donor cohort | Group | Mean CFscore, or difference | 95% interval, low | 95% interval, high | Counties (donors for all) | Counties with a right-leaning pool | Counties with a right-leaning pool (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Every county with a pool | First gave 1980-96 | Counties at least 30% Black | +0.395 | +0.308 | +0.482 | 68 | 59 | 86.8 |
| Every county with a pool | First gave 1980-96 | Other Democratic-voting counties | +0.205 | +0.168 | +0.242 | 317 | n/a | n/a |
| Every county with a pool | First gave 1980-96 | All reliable donors | +0.228 | +0.225 | +0.230 | 422,794 | n/a | n/a |
| Every county with a pool | First gave 1998-2008 | Counties at least 30% Black | +0.193 | +0.116 | +0.269 | 90 | 63 | 70.0 |
| Every county with a pool | First gave 1998-2008 | Other Democratic-voting counties | −0.176 | −0.207 | −0.145 | 363 | n/a | n/a |
| Every county with a pool | First gave 1998-2008 | All reliable donors | −0.081 | −0.083 | −0.080 | 1,562,979 | n/a | n/a |
| Every county with a pool | First gave 2010-16 | Counties at least 30% Black | −0.304 | −0.366 | −0.242 | 72 | 7 | 9.7 |
| Every county with a pool | First gave 2010-16 | Other Democratic-voting counties | −0.565 | −0.587 | −0.543 | 356 | n/a | n/a |
| Every county with a pool | First gave 2010-16 | All reliable donors | −0.467 | −0.469 | −0.465 | 1,249,312 | n/a | n/a |
| Every county with a pool | First gave 2018-24 | Counties at least 30% Black | −0.239 | −0.315 | −0.163 | 80 | 18 | 22.5 |
| Every county with a pool | First gave 2018-24 | Other Democratic-voting counties | −0.560 | −0.580 | −0.540 | 356 | n/a | n/a |
| Every county with a pool | First gave 2018-24 | All reliable donors | −0.457 | −0.459 | −0.455 | 1,482,136 | n/a | n/a |
| Same counties in every cohort | First gave 1980-96 | Counties at least 30% Black | +0.363 | +0.272 | +0.454 | 59 | 50 | 84.7 |
| Same counties in every cohort | First gave 1980-96 | Other Democratic-voting counties | +0.204 | +0.167 | +0.241 | 315 | n/a | n/a |
| Same counties in every cohort | First gave 1980-96 | All reliable donors | +0.228 | +0.225 | +0.230 | 422,794 | n/a | n/a |
| Same counties in every cohort | First gave 1998-2008 | Counties at least 30% Black | +0.135 | +0.038 | +0.231 | 59 | 38 | 64.4 |
| Same counties in every cohort | First gave 1998-2008 | Other Democratic-voting counties | −0.180 | −0.212 | −0.147 | 315 | n/a | n/a |
| Same counties in every cohort | First gave 1998-2008 | All reliable donors | −0.081 | −0.083 | −0.080 | 1,562,979 | n/a | n/a |
| Same counties in every cohort | First gave 2010-16 | Counties at least 30% Black | −0.311 | −0.383 | −0.238 | 59 | 6 | 10.2 |
| Same counties in every cohort | First gave 2010-16 | Other Democratic-voting counties | −0.557 | −0.581 | −0.534 | 315 | n/a | n/a |
| Same counties in every cohort | First gave 2010-16 | All reliable donors | −0.467 | −0.469 | −0.465 | 1,249,312 | n/a | n/a |
| Same counties in every cohort | First gave 2018-24 | Counties at least 30% Black | −0.305 | −0.390 | −0.220 | 59 | 10 | 16.9 |
| Same counties in every cohort | First gave 2018-24 | Other Democratic-voting counties | −0.562 | −0.583 | −0.542 | 315 | n/a | n/a |
| Same counties in every cohort | First gave 2018-24 | All reliable donors | −0.457 | −0.459 | −0.455 | 1,482,136 | n/a | n/a |
| Gap between the two groups | First gave 1980-96 | Difference in mean donor lean | +0.190 | +0.095 | +0.285 | 385 | n/a | n/a |
| Gap between the two groups | First gave 1998-2008 | Difference in mean donor lean | +0.368 | +0.286 | +0.451 | 453 | n/a | n/a |
| Gap between the two groups | First gave 2010-16 | Difference in mean donor lean | +0.261 | +0.195 | +0.327 | 428 | n/a | n/a |
| Gap between the two groups | First gave 2018-24 | Difference in mean donor lean | +0.320 | +0.242 | +0.399 | 436 | n/a | n/a |
The level differs by cohort. In the oldest cohort both groups of counties average right of zero, and in the two cohorts that first gave in 2010 or later both average left of zero, with the counties at least 30%30% percent of residents, non-Hispanic BlackEstimanddefinition of a groupWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties grouped as at least 30% BlackPeriod2020SourceCounty demographics panel Black further right than the others. The newer cohorts are larger (1.5 million1.5 million donorsEstimandcount of donorsn1,482,136Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationreliable donors who first gave in 2018-24Perioddonors first active 2018-24SourceDIME donors for 2018 to 2024, against 0.4 million0.4 million donorsEstimandcount of donorsn422,794Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationreliable donors who first gave in 1980-96Perioddonors first active 1980-96SourceDIME for 1980 to 1996), and a cohort is defined by the first election cycle in which a donor appears, so a difference between cohorts is a difference in who gave. The gap also holds under a stricter rule for a reliable donor. With at least 1515 distinct recipientsEstimanddefinition of the stricter checkWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationdonors in the stricter checkPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME distinct recipients it runs from 0.19 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.30)0.19 CFscore unitsEstimanddifference in mean county donor lean, counties at least 30% Black minus other Democratic-voting counties, smallest across the four cohorts, donors with at least 15 distinct recipientsInterval95% CI 0.07 to 0.30n346Weightsnone (each county counted once)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with 25 or more donors of at least 15 distinct recipients who first gave in the cohortPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIMENoteNormal interval from the spread of county means within each group. to 0.35 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.45)0.35 CFscore unitsEstimanddifference in mean county donor lean, counties at least 30% Black minus other Democratic-voting counties, largest across the four cohorts, donors with at least 15 distinct recipientsInterval95% CI 0.26 to 0.45n410Weightsnone (each county counted once)PopulationDemocratic-voting counties with 25 or more donors of at least 15 distinct recipients who first gave in the cohortPeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIMENoteNormal interval from the spread of county means within each group. CFscore units across the four cohorts, and every interval lies above zero. The reliable rule keeps 19.3%19.3% percent of donorsEstimandshare of donors who are reliablen2,195,412Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationindividual donors with a CFscore and a county who first gave in 1980-96Perioddonors first active 1980-96SourceDIME of the donors who first gave in 1980 to 1996 and 9.6%9.6% percent of donorsEstimandshare of donors who are reliablen15,418,884Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationindividual donors with a CFscore and a county who first gave in 2018-24Perioddonors first active 2018-24SourceDIME of those who first gave in 2018 to 2024, so a cohort comparison inherits a rule that selects different shares of donors in different eras.
What these data cannot show
A county's donor lean describes the donors in the county and not any resident, and a pattern across counties can differ from the pattern among people, the problem known as ecological inferenceEcological inferenceDrawing a conclusion about individuals from data on groups or places, such as counties. A pattern across counties can differ from the pattern among the people who live in them. [2]. DIME does not record the race, income or vote of a donor, so the Black share results say that donor leans differ between counties with different Black shares and cannot say who the donors in those counties are. Studies that observe donors directly find that Black and Latino donors supply smaller shares of contributions than of the population [3], and a study that merges survey responses to donation records compares donors with non-donors [4]. Those studies are about individuals and neither tests nor contradicts the county pattern here.
The files do not say which candidates a donor gave to. A CFscore is an estimate from the recipients' positions, and the chapter cannot separate a donor who gives to Republican candidates from one who gives to moderate Democrats. Geography is the most recent record, so a donor who moved is counted where the last gift came from, and a county's pool spans giving from 1980 to 2024 while the vote is a single election. The reliable-donor rule keeps the donors who gave to many recipients, and the counts in Figure 10 change when it is relaxed. No threshold below 88 distinct recipientsEstimanddefinition of a reliable donorWeightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationdonors counted as reliablePeriod2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME distinct recipients was tested. The divergence rule pivots on the sign of a mean at zero, which is not the middle of the county distribution, since the median county has a donor lean of +0.19+0.19 CFscore units (negative is left)Estimandmedian of the county donor lean, each county counted oncen2,839Weightsnone (full counts of counties)Populationcounties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 two-party presidential return (the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii)Period2020 presidential vote; donors 1980-2024SourceDIME.
The chapter also leaves out donor dollars, and it does not test any mechanism. Whether the donor lean of a county reflects who can give or who is asked cannot be separated with county means. How a county's stated ideology compares with its donors' is the subject of Chapter 14.6, Stated and funded ideology (planned), and how donors who live in counties their side lost behave is the subject of Chapter 15.4, Partisans in the other party's territory (planned). A county with a small pool has a noisy mean, and the intervals on individual counties treat donors as independent draws, which understates the uncertainty if donors in a county resemble each other.
Data sources
- DIMEStanford DIME public version 4.0, reliable individual donors by most recent county, 1980-2024Years: 1979-2024 (23 election cycles) · Weights: none (administrative records); counties counted once or weighted by 2020 two-party votes · License: ODC-BY 1.0, as listed on the Stanford Libraries page (read through a search result, not the license text).
- County election returnsCounty presidential returns, 2020 and 2024 (repaired 1868-2024 file)Years: President 1868-2024 (40 elections); House and Senate 1990-2024 · Weights: none (full counts); two-party votes as weights in the vote-weighted estimates · License: The Heideman file is CC BY 4.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.22976553), but the state records behind it keep their own terms, and the sites of Florida, Indiana, Colorado and Wisconsin restrict reuse.
- County demographics panelCounty demographics panel, 2020 row (decennial population, ACS-based shares interpolated between 2020 and 2024)Years: 2000-2024 (election years, interpolated between census and survey anchors) · Weights: none (full counts and interpolated estimates) · License: US government source data, public domain. The interpolated panel is derived work.
Methods
Sample. 2,839 counties with at least 25 reliable donors and a 2020 presidential return, from the 48 contiguous states and the District of Columbia. Alaska is dropped from the returns, and the county-matched donor file has no donors in Alaska or Hawaii (the DIME donor file has records in both states; the county match excluded Alaska by design and returned no Hawaii county). Two counties are recoded to their successors (Bedford city to Bedford County, Virginia; Shannon to Oglala Lakota County, South Dakota). Donors. Individual donors in the Stanford DIME public version 4.0 with a CFscore and a most recent county, 36,402,792 in all, of whom 4,717,221 are reliable (at least 8 distinct recipients, and a score not inherited from a recipient). Measures. The county donor lean is the mean CFscore of the county's reliable donors (positive is right, negative is left); the county vote is the Democratic share of the 2020 two-party presidential vote from the repaired county file. A county is divergent when it voted Democratic (share above 50%) and its donor lean is positive, or voted Republican and its donor lean is negative. Zero is the neutral point of the CFscore scale, and the definitions table repeats the count with the mean of all reliable donors and with the median county as the neutral point. A county clears both cut points when its Democratic share is 55% or more with a donor lean of 0.25 or more, or its share is below 45% with a lean below −0.25, assigned on unrounded values. Regions are the four Census Bureau regions. Weights and intervals. Shares and counts count each county once; correlations and regressions are reported twice, counting each county once and weighting by 2020 two-party votes; donors are not weighted. Correlations across counties use a county bootstrap (2,000 replicates, seed 12345); regression coefficients use standard errors clustered on state (46 states); the fitted line in the scatter of donor lean on the Democratic share counts each county once and has a band from state-clustered standard errors; group means of counties use a normal interval from the spread of county means; a donor mean uses its standard error and treats donors as independent. County counts and shares are full counts and carry no interval. Noise benchmark. The probability that a county's underlying donor mean has the other sign is the normal probability of a value beyond the county mean in units of its standard error, summed over counties; a second version shrinks each county mean toward a least-squares line in the Democratic share, with the variance of the true county means estimated by the method of moments, and gives the higher count. Pool floors and cohorts. The Black share comparison is repeated for counties with at least 100 and at least 500 reliable donors. Cohorts group donors by the election cycle of their first record (1980 to 1996, 1998 to 2008, 2010 to 2016, 2018 to 2024); the cohort gaps are repeated with donors of at least 15 distinct recipients, and the share of donors who are reliable is reported by cohort. Suppression. A county needs at least 25 reliable donors (and in a cohort view at least 25 donors who first gave in the cohort); counties are named only with at least 75; a band of a bar chart needs at least 10 counties on a side. Missing data. Ten counties lack a college share or median income (the eight Connecticut counties, whose 2020 boundaries changed, De Baca, New Mexico, and Jeff Davis, Texas); the Democratic-voting ones, all in Connecticut, drop out of the Black share correlations and regressions only. Vote-year check. 2024 returns from the repaired file, without four Missouri counties whose 2024 returns exclude Kansas City.
References
- Bonica, Adam (2014). Mapping the Ideological Marketplace. American Journal of Political Science 58(2): 367-386. doi:10.1111/ajps.12062
- Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals. American Sociological Review 15(3): 351-357. doi:10.2307/2087176
- Grumbach, Jacob M.; Sahn, Alexander (2020). Race and Representation in Campaign Finance. American Political Science Review 114(1): 206-221. doi:10.1017/S0003055419000637
- Hill, Seth J.; Huber, Gregory A. (2017). Representativeness and Motivations of the Contemporary Donorate: Results from Merged Survey and Administrative Records. Political Behavior 39(1): 3-29. doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9343-y
How to cite
@misc{singh2026countieswheredonorsandvotersdiverge,
author = {Singh, Vishal},
title = {Counties where donors and voters diverge},
year = {2026},
url = {https://vishalsingh.org/politics/counties-where-donors-and-voters-diverge},
note = {In The Public Mind. Published 30 September 2026.}
}