Skip to content
Contents
The Public Mind

    Type to search. Planned chapters match by title only.

    Chapter 3.1

    The two coalitions

    Voters with a four-year degree rose from 19.2% to 43.4% of Democratic voters between the elections of 1976 to 1988 and those of 2012 to 2024, and from 25.2% to 31.4% of Republican voters, and a group's share of a party's voters can move opposite to its share voting for the party.

    DraftFigures and numbers may change as the analysis is rebuilt.what is still being checked

    The ANES and the CES disagree on the degree-holding share of Republican voters after 2008; the chapter reports both and has not resolved the difference.

    In the American National Election Studies (ANES), voters with a four-year degree made up 19.2% (95% CI 17.5% to 20.9%)19.2% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are holders of a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 17.5% to 20.9%n2,173Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, holders of a four-year degreePeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of Democratic voters in the presidential elections of 1976 to 1988 and 43.4% (95% CI 42.0% to 44.8%)43.4% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are holders of a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 42.0% to 44.8%n9,449Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, holders of a four-year degreePeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of those in 2012 to 2024. Among Republican voters the share went from 25.2% (95% CI 23.5% to 26.9%)25.2% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are holders of a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 23.5% to 26.9%n2,563Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, holders of a four-year degreePeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 31.4% (95% CI 29.9% to 32.8%)31.4% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are holders of a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 29.9% to 32.8%n7,156Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, holders of a four-year degreePeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File. White non-Hispanic voters went from 72.7% (95% CI 70.8% to 74.6%)72.7% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are white non-HispanicInterval95% CI 70.8% to 74.6%n2,179Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, white non-HispanicPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 58.0% (95% CI 56.6% to 59.4%)58.0% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are white non-HispanicInterval95% CI 56.6% to 59.4%n9,493Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, white non-HispanicPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of Democratic voters and from 94.8% (95% CI 93.9% to 95.7%)94.8% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are white non-HispanicInterval95% CI 93.9% to 95.7%n2,570Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, white non-HispanicPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 85.9% (95% CI 84.8% to 87.0%)85.9% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are white non-HispanicInterval95% CI 84.8% to 87.0%n7,190Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, white non-HispanicPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of Republican voters, so both coalitions became more diverse and the Democratic coalition changed by the larger amount.

    Those are shares of a party's voters. They answer a different question from the one about how likely a group is to vote for the party, and a change in one does not identify a change in the other. White voters were 39.4% (95% CI 37.8% to 40.9%)39.4% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 37.8% to 40.9%n4,030Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters who are white non-HispanicPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File Democratic in 1976 to 1988 and 44.4% (95% CI 43.2% to 45.6%)44.4% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 43.2% to 45.6%n12,097Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters who are white non-HispanicPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File in 2012 to 2024, a rise, while their share of Democratic voters fell by 14.714.7 percentage pointsEstimandearlier minus later share of Democratic voters; independent periods, standard errors combinedInterval95% CI 12.3 to 17.1Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, white non-HispanicPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File pointsPercentage pointThe unit for the difference between two percentages. A change from one share to another is stated in points, not in percent, so that absolute and relative change are not confused.. The chapter keeps two denominators apart throughout: the share of a group that votes Democratic, where the group is the denominator, and the share of a party's voters who belong to the group, where the party is the denominator. It also keeps apart four populations that are easy to blur: eligible adults, voters, party identifiers and nonvoters.

    Three surveys carry the evidence. The ANES Cumulative Data File has presidential vote and demographics for every election from 1952 to 2024, with 34,42334,423 respondentsEstimandcount of respondents with a positive vote weightWeightsnone (count)PopulationANES respondents who reported a Democratic or Republican presidential votePeriod1952 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File respondents in 1919 electionsEstimandcount of electionsWeightsnone (count)PopulationANES presidential elections 1952 to 2024Period1952 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File elections who reported voting for the Democratic or the Republican candidate. The Cooperative Election Study (CES), an online panel, has 188,145188,145 respondentsEstimandcount of respondents with a positive weightWeightsnone (count)PopulationCES respondents who reported a Democratic or Republican presidential votePeriod2008, 2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024SourceCooperative Election Study such respondents from 2008 to 2024 and finer religious and racial categories. The Current Population Survey (CPS) voting supplement records no vote choice, and the chapter uses it for one purpose: the make-up of citizens aged 1818 years of ageEstimandlowest age in the youngest bandWeightsnone (definition)Populationdefinition of an age bandPeriodall yearsSourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement or older, who are the eligible adults here, and of the voters among them, in the presidential elections from 1996 to 2024.Every interval is a 95% confidence intervalConfidence intervalA range around an estimate that would contain the true value in 95% of repeated samples if the sampling model held. The book reports 95% intervals unless it says otherwise.. Shares use the Kish effective sample sizeEffective sample sizeThe number of equally weighted respondents that would give the same precision as the weighted sample. It is smaller than the raw count when the weights vary a lot, and it sets how wide the confidence interval is. [1] and treat the weightedSurvey weightsNumbers that scale each respondent so the sample matches the population on known traits such as age, race, education and region. A weighted average counts a respondent with a large weight for more than one with a small weight. sample as a simple random sample, which leaves out the stages of each sample design. The CES is an opt-in panel and the CPS extract carries no replicate weights, so their intervals are narrower than a design-based interval would be. The terms of the two decompositions come from a seeded bootstrap, described in the methods note. A voter in the ANES and the CES is a respondent who reported voting for one of the two major-party candidates; third-party voters and nonvoters are outside that frame, which is why a party's group shares sum to a whole. A party identifier is a respondent who calls themselves a Democrat or a Republican and counts leanersPartisan leanerA respondent who first says they are independent but, when asked, says they lean toward one party. Most figures group leaners with the party they lean toward, and each chapter says which grouping it uses..

    A group's Democratic share and its share of Democratic voters are different numbers

    In the 2024 CES, 43.5% (95% CI 42.7% to 44.4%)43.5% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 42.7% to 44.4%n31,857Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationwhite two-party presidential votersPeriod2024SourceCooperative Election Study of white voters supported the Democratic candidate, and white voters made up 64.3% (95% CI 63.3% to 65.3%)64.3% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of Democratic two-party voters who are in the groupInterval95% CI 63.3% to 65.3%n23,517Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationwhite, among Democratic two-party presidential votersPeriod2024SourceCooperative Election Study of Democratic voters. Black voters supported the Democratic candidate at 81.9% (95% CI 79.8% to 84.0%)81.9% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 79.8% to 84.0%n3,753Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationblack two-party presidential votersPeriod2024SourceCooperative Election Study, the highest rate of any racial or ethnic group, and made up 15.6% (95% CI 14.8% to 16.3%)15.6% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of Democratic two-party voters who are in the groupInterval95% CI 14.8% to 16.3%n23,517Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationblack, among Democratic two-party presidential votersPeriod2024SourceCooperative Election Study of Democratic voters. The first group leans Republican and is a majority of the coalition because it is 72.3%72.3% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted share of all two-party voters who are in the groupInterval95% CI 71.6% to 73.0%n42,008Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationwhite, among two-party presidential votersPeriod2024SourceCooperative Election Study of all voters. The second is overwhelmingly Democratic and a small part of the coalition because it is 9.3%9.3% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted share of all two-party voters who are in the groupInterval95% CI 8.9% to 9.7%n42,008Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationblack, among two-party presidential votersPeriod2024SourceCooperative Election Study of all voters. Figure 1 shows both numbers for every group in the CES.

    Figure 1

    In 2024 white voters leaned Republican and still made up most of the Democratic coalition

    Two shares for each group of two-party presidential voters in 2024: the Democratic share of the group's voters and the group's share of all Democratic voters, percent; 95% intervals from the Kish effective sample size

    • Democratic share of the group's voters
    • Group's share of Democratic voters

    Education

    Race and ethnicity

    Religion

    Age

    Gender

    Percent of two-party voters

    Show data
    Data for In 2024 white voters leaned Republican and still made up most of the Democratic coalition
    DimensionGroupShareEstimate (%)95% CI low95% CI highn voters in the denominatorGroup's share of all voters (%)Group's share of Republican voters (%)
    EducationPostgraduate degreeDemocratic share of the group's voters61.960.363.46,56516.012.0
    EducationPostgraduate degreeGroup's share of Democratic voters20.319.421.123,51716.012.0
    EducationCollege graduateDemocratic share of the group's voters52.651.253.910,42925.824.0
    EducationCollege graduateGroup's share of Democratic voters27.726.728.623,51725.824.0
    EducationSome collegeDemocratic share of the group's voters47.245.848.514,75931.132.2
    EducationSome collegeGroup's share of Democratic voters30.029.030.923,51731.132.2
    EducationHigh school or lessDemocratic share of the group's voters40.038.341.610,25527.131.8
    EducationHigh school or lessGroup's share of Democratic voters22.121.222.923,51727.131.8
    Race and ethnicityWhiteDemocratic share of the group's voters43.542.744.431,85772.380.0
    Race and ethnicityWhiteGroup's share of Democratic voters64.363.365.323,51772.380.0
    Race and ethnicityBlackDemocratic share of the group's voters81.979.884.03,7539.33.3
    Race and ethnicityBlackGroup's share of Democratic voters15.614.816.323,5179.33.3
    Race and ethnicityHispanicDemocratic share of the group's voters54.751.957.63,56410.49.2
    Race and ethnicityHispanicGroup's share of Democratic voters11.611.012.323,51710.49.2
    Race and ethnicityAsianDemocratic share of the group's voters63.058.667.41,0653.72.6
    Race and ethnicityAsianGroup's share of Democratic voters4.74.35.123,5173.72.6
    Race and ethnicityOtherDemocratic share of the group's voters43.039.147.01,7694.34.9
    Race and ethnicityOtherGroup's share of Democratic voters3.83.44.223,5174.34.9
    ReligionProtestantDemocratic share of the group's voters32.931.834.114,20136.948.5
    ReligionProtestantGroup's share of Democratic voters24.823.925.723,50636.948.5
    ReligionCatholicDemocratic share of the group's voters43.341.645.07,97318.520.6
    ReligionCatholicGroup's share of Democratic voters16.415.617.123,50618.520.6
    ReligionJewishDemocratic share of the group's voters68.064.072.11,2192.71.7
    ReligionJewishGroup's share of Democratic voters3.73.34.123,5062.71.7
    ReligionOther religionDemocratic share of the group's voters45.743.148.24,28710.911.5
    ReligionOther religionGroup's share of Democratic voters10.19.510.723,50610.911.5
    ReligionNo religionDemocratic share of the group's voters70.969.772.214,31131.017.7
    ReligionNo religionGroup's share of Democratic voters45.043.946.023,50631.017.7
    Age18 to 29Democratic share of the group's voters60.657.663.63,08211.79.1
    Age18 to 29Group's share of Democratic voters14.513.815.323,51711.79.1
    Age30 to 44Democratic share of the group's voters55.153.556.87,07323.120.3
    Age30 to 44Group's share of Democratic voters26.125.127.023,51723.120.3
    Age45 to 64Democratic share of the group's voters43.942.845.116,84835.338.8
    Age45 to 64Group's share of Democratic voters31.730.732.723,51735.338.8
    Age65 and overDemocratic share of the group's voters45.544.446.715,00529.831.8
    Age65 and overGroup's share of Democratic voters27.726.828.623,51729.831.8
    GenderWomenDemocratic share of the group's voters50.849.851.821,75950.748.7
    GenderWomenGroup's share of Democratic voters52.951.853.923,30050.748.7
    GenderMenDemocratic share of the group's voters46.645.547.819,99849.351.3
    GenderMenGroup's share of Democratic voters47.146.148.223,30049.351.3
    The two dots in a row answer different questions and can sit far apart. 81.9% of Black voters voted Democratic, and Black voters were 15.6% of Democratic voters; 43.5% of white voters voted Democratic, and white voters were 64.3% of Democratic voters. The first dot divides by the group's voters and the second by the party's voters, and the group's share of all voters links them. The table gives that share and the group's share of Republican voters.Note: The CES is an opt-in online panel, so its intervals are model based and do not cover how respondents were recruited.Source: Cooperative Election Study cumulative file, 2024; weighted (weight_cumulative); two-party presidential voters

    For a group $g$, the share of Democratic voters who belong to it is

    cD(g)=s(g) d(g)D,c_D(g) = s(g)\,\frac{d(g)}{D},

    where $s(g)$ is the group's share of all voters, $d(g)$ is the share of the group's voters who vote Democratic and $D$ is the Democratic share of all voters. The ratio $d(g)/D$ is the group's relative lean. The share of Republican voters who belong to the group is the same product with Republican shares in place of Democratic ones. Axelrod's account of the party coalitions from 1952 to 1968 used the same arithmetic, breaking a group's contribution to a party's vote into its size, its turnout and its loyalty [2]. A group can become a larger part of a coalition because it grew, because it leans further toward the party, or both, and its share of the coalition can fall while its Democratic share rises.

    A rise in the Democratic share among degree holders therefore says nothing by itself about how many Democratic voters hold degrees, and a rise in the degree holders' share of Democratic voters says nothing about whether any voter changed party.

    Eligible adults, voters, party identifiers and nonvoters differ in make-up

    Eligible adults are citizens aged 1818 years of ageEstimandlowest age in the youngest bandWeightsnone (definition)Populationdefinition of an age bandPeriodall yearsSourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement or older. Voters are the eligible adults who voted, party identifiers are people who identify with a party whether or not they vote, and nonvoters are eligible adults who did not vote.The definition of eligible adults here excludes noncitizens, whom the CPS identifies from 1994, and keeps everyone else, including adults who are barred from voting for other reasons [3]. The CPS counts a respondent who gave no turnout answer as a nonvoter, the Census convention, which Hur and Achen examine [4]. Turnout is self-reported in all three surveys. In the CPS, 37.1% (95% CI 36.7% to 37.5%)37.1% percent of eligible adultsEstimandweighted share of eligible adults with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 36.7% to 37.5%n72,590WeightsVOSUPPWTPopulationcitizens aged 18 or older with a turnout answerPeriod2024SourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement of eligible adults held a four-year degree in 2024 and 44.9% (95% CI 44.4% to 45.4%)44.9% percent of votersEstimandweighted share of voters with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 44.4% to 45.4%n48,387WeightsVOSUPPWTPopulationvoters among citizens aged 18 or olderPeriod2024SourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement of voters did. In every presidential election from 1996 to 2024 voters were more likely than eligible adults to hold a degree and less likely to be in the youngest age band, ages 1818 years of ageEstimandlowest age in the youngest bandWeightsnone (definition)Populationdefinition of an age bandPeriodall yearsSourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement to 2929 years of ageEstimandhighest age in the youngest bandWeightsnone (definition)Populationdefinition of an age bandPeriodall yearsSourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement (Figure 2). The degree-holding share of eligible adults rose from 22.3% (95% CI 22.0% to 22.6%)22.3% percent of eligible adultsEstimandweighted share of eligible adults with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 22.0% to 22.6%n84,090WeightsVOSUPPWTPopulationcitizens aged 18 or older with a turnout answerPeriod1996SourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement in 1996 to 37.1% (95% CI 36.7% to 37.5%)37.1% percent of eligible adultsEstimandweighted share of eligible adults with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 36.7% to 37.5%n72,590WeightsVOSUPPWTPopulationcitizens aged 18 or older with a turnout answerPeriod2024SourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement in 2024 and that of voters from 29.4% (95% CI 29.0% to 29.8%)29.4% percent of votersEstimandweighted share of voters with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 29.0% to 29.8%n50,025WeightsVOSUPPWTPopulationvoters among citizens aged 18 or olderPeriod1996SourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement to 44.9% (95% CI 44.4% to 45.4%)44.9% percent of votersEstimandweighted share of voters with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 44.4% to 45.4%n48,387WeightsVOSUPPWTPopulationvoters among citizens aged 18 or olderPeriod2024SourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement, a rise of 15.5 (95% CI 14.8 to 16.2)15.5 percentage pointsEstimand2024 minus 1996 degree-holding share of voters; seeded bootstrap within yearInterval95% CI 14.8 to 16.2n156,680WeightsVOSUPPWTPopulationvoters among citizens aged 18 or olderPeriod1996 to 2024SourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement points. A gap between voters and eligible adults at one date is a snapshot and does not split that rise, so the chapter splits it. Had degree holders and other adults kept their 1996 turnout rates, degree holders would have been 46.1% (95% CI 45.5% to 46.7%)46.1% percent of votersEstimanddegree-holding share of 2024 voters if degree holders and other adults had kept their 1996 turnout rates; seeded bootstrap within yearInterval95% CI 45.5% to 46.7%n156,680WeightsVOSUPPWTPopulationvoters among citizens aged 18 or older, 2024 with 1996 turnout rates by educationPeriod2024SourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement of 2024 voters. On that counterfactual the growth of the group among eligible adults accounts for +16.7 (95% CI 16.1 to 17.3)+16.7 percentage pointsEstimandcounterfactual share minus the 1996 share: the part of the rise from the growth of the group among eligible adults; seeded bootstrap within yearInterval95% CI 16.1 to 17.3n156,680WeightsVOSUPPWTPopulationvoters among citizens aged 18 or olderPeriod1996 to 2024SourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement points of the rise and the change in relative turnout for −1.2 (95% CI −1.6 to −0.8)−1.2 percentage pointsEstimandactual 2024 share minus the counterfactual share: the part of the rise from the change in relative turnout; seeded bootstrap within yearInterval95% CI −1.6 to −0.8n156,680WeightsVOSUPPWTPopulationvoters among citizens aged 18 or olderPeriod1996 to 2024SourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement points. Chapter 3.7, Turnout reports turnout rates by group.

    Figure 2

    In every presidential election since 1996 voters were more likely than eligible adults to hold a four-year degree and less likely to be in the youngest age band

    Share of eligible adults (citizens aged 18 or older) and share of voters in each group, percent, by presidential election; CPS voting supplement; 95% intervals from the Kish effective sample size

    • Eligible adults
    • Voters
    Show data
    Data for In every presidential election since 1996 voters were more likely than eligible adults to hold a four-year degree and less likely to be in the youngest age band
    ElectionDimensionGroupEligible adults (%)95% CI low95% CI highn eligibleVoters (%)95% CI low95% CI highn votersVoters minus eligible (points)95% CI low of difference95% CI high of difference
    1996EducationLess than high school16.215.916.484,09010.710.411.050,025−5.4−5.7−5.2
    1996EducationHigh school graduate34.434.134.884,09030.530.030.950,025−3.9−4.2−3.6
    1996EducationSome college27.126.827.584,09029.428.929.850,025+2.2+1.9+2.5
    1996EducationFour-year degree or more22.322.022.684,09029.429.029.850,025+7.1+6.9+7.4
    1996Race and ethnicityWhite non-Hispanic79.278.979.684,09082.582.182.850,025+3.2+2.9+3.5
    1996Race and ethnicityBlack non-Hispanic11.711.511.984,09010.610.310.950,025−1.1−1.3−0.8
    1996Race and ethnicityHispanic6.26.06.484,0904.74.54.950,025−1.5−1.7−1.4
    1996Race and ethnicityAsian or Pacific Islander2.12.02.284,0901.61.51.750,025−0.4−0.5−0.4
    1996Race and ethnicityOther or multiple races0.80.70.884,0900.60.50.750,025−0.2−0.2−0.1
    1996Age18 to 2922.021.722.384,09014.914.615.250,025−7.1−7.4−6.8
    1996Age30 to 4432.632.333.084,09031.831.332.350,025−0.8−1.1−0.5
    1996Age45 to 6428.227.928.684,09033.032.533.450,025+4.7+4.5+5.0
    1996Age65 and over17.216.917.484,09020.319.920.750,025+3.2+2.9+3.4
    1996GenderWomen52.352.052.784,09053.452.953.950,025+1.1+0.8+1.4
    1996GenderMen47.747.348.084,09046.646.147.150,025−1.1−1.4−0.8
    2000EducationLess than high school14.314.114.682,4289.39.09.550,010−5.1−5.3−4.8
    2000EducationHigh school graduate33.633.233.982,42829.729.230.150,010−3.9−4.2−3.6
    2000EducationSome college28.227.828.582,42829.929.530.450,010+1.8+1.5+2.0
    2000EducationFour-year degree or more23.923.624.382,42831.230.731.650,010+7.2+7.0+7.5
    2000Race and ethnicityWhite non-Hispanic77.377.077.682,42880.680.281.050,010+3.3+3.0+3.6
    2000Race and ethnicityBlack non-Hispanic11.711.411.982,42811.210.911.550,010−0.5−0.7−0.3
    2000Race and ethnicityHispanic7.47.27.682,4285.55.35.750,010−1.9−2.1−1.7
    2000Race and ethnicityAsian or Pacific Islander2.82.62.982,4282.01.92.150,010−0.8−0.9−0.6
    2000Race and ethnicityOther or multiple races0.90.81.082,4280.70.60.850,010−0.2−0.2−0.1
    2000Age18 to 2920.820.521.182,42814.113.714.450,010−6.8−7.0−6.5
    2000Age30 to 4430.430.130.882,42829.829.430.350,010−0.6−0.9−0.3
    2000Age45 to 6431.531.131.882,42835.835.436.350,010+4.4+4.1+4.7
    2000Age65 and over17.317.017.682,42820.319.920.650,010+2.9+2.7+3.2
    2000GenderWomen52.552.152.982,42853.653.154.150,010+1.1+0.8+1.5
    2000GenderMen47.547.147.982,42846.445.946.950,010−1.1−1.5−0.8
    2004EducationLess than high school13.012.813.396,4528.17.88.363,052−5.0−5.2−4.8
    2004EducationHigh school graduate32.332.032.796,45228.528.129.063,052−3.8−4.0−3.5
    2004EducationSome college28.728.329.096,45231.030.531.463,052+2.3+2.0+2.5
    2004EducationFour-year degree or more26.025.626.396,45232.432.032.963,052+6.5+6.2+6.7
    2004Race and ethnicityWhite non-Hispanic75.274.975.596,45279.278.879.663,052+4.0+3.7+4.2
    2004Race and ethnicityBlack non-Hispanic11.611.411.896,45211.010.711.363,052−0.6−0.8−0.4
    2004Race and ethnicityHispanic8.28.08.496,4526.05.86.263,052−2.1−2.3−2.0
    2004Race and ethnicityAsian or Pacific Islander3.33.23.596,4522.32.22.563,052−1.0−1.1−0.9
    2004Race and ethnicityOther or multiple races1.71.61.896,4521.51.41.663,052−0.2−0.3−0.2
    2004Age18 to 2920.920.621.296,45216.015.716.363,052−4.8−5.1−4.6
    2004Age30 to 4427.927.628.396,45227.326.927.763,052−0.6−0.9−0.4
    2004Age45 to 6434.133.834.496,45237.637.238.163,052+3.5+3.3+3.8
    2004Age65 and over17.116.817.496,45219.018.719.463,052+1.9+1.7+2.1
    2004GenderWomen52.251.852.696,45253.553.154.063,052+1.3+1.0+1.6
    2004GenderMen47.847.448.296,45246.546.046.963,052−1.3−1.6−1.0
    2008EducationLess than high school11.210.911.492,3606.96.77.159,975−4.3−4.5−4.1
    2008EducationHigh school graduate31.731.432.192,36027.326.927.859,975−4.4−4.6−4.1
    2008EducationSome college29.629.329.992,36031.631.232.159,975+2.0+1.8+2.3
    2008EducationFour-year degree or more27.527.227.992,36034.133.734.659,975+6.6+6.4+6.8
    2008Race and ethnicityWhite non-Hispanic73.473.173.892,36076.375.976.759,975+2.9+2.6+3.1
    2008Race and ethnicityBlack non-Hispanic11.811.612.092,36012.111.812.459,975+0.3+0.1+0.5
    2008Race and ethnicityHispanic9.59.39.792,3607.47.27.759,975−2.0−2.2−1.9
    2008Race and ethnicityAsian or Pacific Islander3.63.53.792,3602.72.52.859,975−0.9−1.0−0.8
    2008Race and ethnicityOther or multiple races1.71.61.892,3601.51.41.659,975−0.2−0.2−0.1
    2008Age18 to 2921.321.021.692,36017.116.717.459,975−4.2−4.5−4.0
    2008Age30 to 4425.525.225.892,36024.824.425.259,975−0.7−1.0−0.5
    2008Age45 to 6435.635.336.092,36038.738.239.159,975+3.1+2.8+3.3
    2008Age65 and over17.617.317.992,36019.519.119.859,975+1.8+1.6+2.0
    2008GenderWomen52.051.752.492,36053.753.254.159,975+1.6+1.4+1.9
    2008GenderMen48.047.648.392,36046.345.946.859,975−1.6−1.9−1.4
    2012EducationLess than high school10.29.910.494,3116.26.06.559,597−3.9−4.1−3.7
    2012EducationHigh school graduate30.430.130.794,31125.925.526.359,597−4.5−4.8−4.3
    2012EducationSome college30.129.830.594,31131.330.931.759,597+1.2+0.9+1.4
    2012EducationFour-year degree or more29.329.029.794,31136.636.237.059,597+7.3+7.0+7.5
    2012Race and ethnicityWhite non-Hispanic71.170.771.494,31173.773.374.159,597+2.7+2.4+3.0
    2012Race and ethnicityBlack non-Hispanic12.011.712.294,31112.912.613.259,597+0.9+0.7+1.1
    2012Race and ethnicityHispanic10.810.611.194,3118.48.28.759,597−2.4−2.6−2.2
    2012Race and ethnicityAsian or Pacific Islander4.03.94.294,3113.12.93.259,597−1.0−1.1−0.8
    2012Race and ethnicityOther or multiple races2.12.02.294,3111.91.72.059,597−0.2−0.3−0.1
    2012Age18 to 2921.220.921.594,31115.415.115.859,597−5.8−6.0−5.5
    2012Age30 to 4424.023.724.394,31123.122.723.559,597−0.9−1.1−0.6
    2012Age45 to 6435.635.336.094,31139.138.739.659,597+3.5+3.2+3.8
    2012Age65 and over19.118.919.494,31122.321.922.759,597+3.2+2.9+3.4
    2012GenderWomen52.151.752.594,31153.753.254.259,597+1.6+1.3+1.9
    2012GenderMen47.947.548.394,31146.345.846.859,597−1.6−1.9−1.3
    2016EducationLess than high school9.18.99.393,7945.14.95.358,533−4.0−4.2−3.8
    2016EducationHigh school graduate29.228.929.693,79424.624.225.058,533−4.7−5.0−4.4
    2016EducationSome college29.829.530.293,79430.830.331.258,533+0.9+0.7+1.2
    2016EducationFour-year degree or more31.931.532.293,79439.639.240.158,533+7.8+7.5+8.0
    2016Race and ethnicityWhite non-Hispanic68.968.669.393,79473.372.973.758,533+4.4+4.1+4.7
    2016Race and ethnicityBlack non-Hispanic12.312.012.593,79411.911.612.258,533−0.4−0.6−0.2
    2016Race and ethnicityHispanic11.911.712.193,7949.29.09.558,533−2.7−2.9−2.5
    2016Race and ethnicityAsian or Pacific Islander4.74.64.993,7943.83.63.958,533−1.0−1.1−0.8
    2016Race and ethnicityOther or multiple races2.22.12.393,7941.81.61.958,533−0.4−0.5−0.3
    2016Age18 to 2920.920.621.293,79415.715.416.158,533−5.2−5.5−4.9
    2016Age30 to 4423.523.223.893,79422.522.122.958,533−1.0−1.3−0.8
    2016Age45 to 6434.634.335.093,79437.637.138.058,533+3.0+2.7+3.2
    2016Age65 and over21.020.721.393,79424.223.824.658,533+3.2+3.0+3.5
    2016GenderWomen52.051.652.493,79453.653.254.158,533+1.6+1.3+1.9
    2016GenderMen48.047.648.493,79446.445.946.858,533−1.6−1.9−1.3
    2020EducationLess than high school7.67.47.881,8984.64.44.855,170−3.0−3.2−2.8
    2020EducationHigh school graduate29.228.829.581,89824.223.824.655,170−4.9−5.2−4.7
    2020EducationSome college28.528.228.981,89829.729.330.255,170+1.2+1.0+1.4
    2020EducationFour-year degree or more34.734.435.181,89841.541.041.955,170+6.7+6.5+7.0
    2020Race and ethnicityWhite non-Hispanic66.966.567.281,89871.070.671.555,170+4.2+3.9+4.5
    2020Race and ethnicityBlack non-Hispanic12.412.212.781,89811.711.412.055,170−0.7−0.9−0.5
    2020Race and ethnicityHispanic13.213.013.581,89810.610.410.955,170−2.6−2.8−2.4
    2020Race and ethnicityAsian or Pacific Islander5.14.95.281,8984.54.34.755,170−0.6−0.7−0.4
    2020Race and ethnicityOther or multiple races2.42.32.581,8982.12.02.355,170−0.3−0.4−0.2
    2020Age18 to 2920.320.020.681,89816.516.116.855,170−3.9−4.1−3.6
    2020Age30 to 4424.023.724.481,89823.222.823.655,170−0.9−1.1−0.6
    2020Age45 to 6432.632.333.081,89834.734.235.155,170+2.1+1.8+2.3
    2020Age65 and over23.022.723.481,89825.725.326.155,170+2.7+2.4+2.9
    2020GenderWomen51.951.552.381,89853.152.753.655,170+1.3+1.0+1.5
    2020GenderMen48.147.748.581,89846.946.447.355,170−1.3−1.5−1.0
    2024EducationLess than high school6.96.77.172,5903.83.74.048,387−3.1−3.2−2.9
    2024EducationHigh school graduate28.628.329.072,59023.022.623.548,387−5.6−5.9−5.3
    2024EducationSome college27.427.027.872,59028.227.828.748,387+0.8+0.6+1.1
    2024EducationFour-year degree or more37.136.737.572,59044.944.445.448,387+7.8+7.5+8.1
    2024Race and ethnicityWhite non-Hispanic65.565.165.972,59070.670.171.148,387+5.1+4.8+5.4
    2024Race and ethnicityBlack non-Hispanic12.512.212.872,59011.511.111.848,387−1.0−1.2−0.8
    2024Race and ethnicityHispanic13.913.614.272,59010.710.411.148,387−3.1−3.4−2.9
    2024Race and ethnicityAsian or Pacific Islander5.65.45.872,5904.94.75.248,387−0.7−0.8−0.5
    2024Race and ethnicityOther or multiple races2.62.52.772,5902.32.12.448,387−0.3−0.4−0.2
    2024Age18 to 2919.619.320.072,59015.314.915.648,387−4.4−4.7−4.1
    2024Age30 to 4424.724.425.172,59023.423.023.848,387−1.3−1.6−1.0
    2024Age45 to 6431.130.731.572,59033.332.833.848,387+2.2+1.9+2.5
    2024Age65 and over24.624.224.972,59028.127.628.548,387+3.5+3.3+3.8
    2024GenderWomen51.651.252.072,59052.852.353.348,387+1.2+0.9+1.5
    2024GenderMen48.448.048.872,59047.246.747.748,387−1.2−1.5−0.9
    In 2024, 44.9% of voters held a four-year degree against 37.1% of eligible adults, a difference of 7.8 points. The ring is the group's share of eligible adults and the dot is its share of voters, and a dot to the right of its ring means the group is over-represented among voters. The buttons switch the election.Note: Voters are respondents who said they voted, with the Census convention that a missing turnout answer counts as not voting. The CPS extract has no replicate weights, so the intervals ignore the survey design and are narrower than design-based intervals.Note: The difference and its interval in the table use a Taylor linearization of the voter share minus the eligible share.Source: CPS November voting supplement, 1996 to 2024; weighted (VOSUPPWT); citizens aged 18 or older

    Party identifiers are a third population. Figure 3 compares the 2024 ANES populations, with party identifiers in the lower rows. Degree holders were 50.0% (95% CI 47.0% to 53.0%)50.0% percent of the population in the rowEstimandweighted share with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 47.0% to 53.0%n2,178Weightsweight (VCF0009z) for all respondents and party identifiers; weight_postelection for voters and nonvotersPopulationANES 2024 respondents: Democratic votersPeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File of Democratic voters and 43.3% (95% CI 40.5% to 46.1%)43.3% percent of the population in the rowEstimandweighted share with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 40.5% to 46.1%n2,619Weightsweight (VCF0009z) for all respondents and party identifiers; weight_postelection for voters and nonvotersPopulationANES 2024 respondents: Democratic identifiers, leaners includedPeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File of Democratic identifiers, against 27.8% (95% CI 24.8% to 30.9%)27.8% percent of the population in the rowEstimandweighted share with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 24.8% to 30.9%n1,725Weightsweight (VCF0009z) for all respondents and party identifiers; weight_postelection for voters and nonvotersPopulationANES 2024 respondents: Republican votersPeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File of Republican voters and 27.2% (95% CI 24.7% to 29.8%)27.2% percent of the population in the rowEstimandweighted share with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 24.7% to 29.8%n2,436Weightsweight (VCF0009z) for all respondents and party identifiers; weight_postelection for voters and nonvotersPopulationANES 2024 respondents: Republican identifiers, leaners includedPeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File of Republican identifiers. Among nonvoters the share was 15.7% (95% CI 12.3% to 19.2%)15.7% percent of the population in the rowEstimandweighted share with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 12.3% to 19.2%n829Weightsweight (VCF0009z) for all respondents and party identifiers; weight_postelection for voters and nonvotersPopulationANES 2024 respondents: nonvoters (self-reported)Period2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File, and among independents with no party lean it was 18.2% (95% CI 12.5% to 23.9%)18.2% percent of the population in the rowEstimandweighted share with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 12.5% to 23.9%n378Weightsweight (VCF0009z) for all respondents and party identifiers; weight_postelection for voters and nonvotersPopulationANES 2024 respondents: independents who lean toward neither partyPeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File. Democratic voters are more likely than Democratic identifiers to hold a degree, and Republican voters and identifiers differ little. A statement about Democrats can refer to any of the Democratic rows, so the chapter says which one it means: voters, except in this figure.

    Figure 3

    Democratic voters are more likely than Democratic identifiers to hold a four-year degree, and nonvoters are less likely than voters

    Share of each ANES population in four groups, percent, 2024 (the buttons show 2020); 95% intervals from the Kish effective sample size

    Four-year degree or more

    White non-Hispanic

    Women

    Age 65 and over

    Share of the population in the row (%)

    Show data
    Data for Democratic voters are more likely than Democratic identifiers to hold a four-year degree, and nonvoters are less likely than voters
    ElectionGroupPopulationShare (%)95% CI low95% CI highn
    2024Four-year degree or moreAll respondents34.432.636.25,465
    2024White non-HispanicAll respondents64.362.466.15,454
    2024WomenAll respondents51.649.753.55,475
    2024Age 65 and overAll respondents23.521.825.15,242
    2024Four-year degree or moreNonvoters15.712.319.2829
    2024White non-HispanicNonvoters53.849.058.5829
    2024WomenNonvoters51.546.756.2832
    2024Age 65 and overNonvoters10.47.513.3814
    2024Four-year degree or moreVoters39.837.742.04,083
    2024White non-HispanicVoters67.165.169.24,076
    2024WomenVoters51.549.353.74,091
    2024Age 65 and overVoters26.824.828.83,916
    2024Four-year degree or moreDemocratic voters50.047.053.02,178
    2024White non-HispanicDemocratic voters57.354.360.32,178
    2024WomenDemocratic voters55.652.658.62,181
    2024Age 65 and overDemocratic voters28.625.831.42,104
    2024Four-year degree or moreRepublican voters27.824.830.91,725
    2024White non-HispanicRepublican voters79.576.782.21,719
    2024WomenRepublican voters47.343.950.71,730
    2024Age 65 and overRepublican voters25.722.728.71,648
    2024Four-year degree or moreDemocratic identifiers43.340.546.12,619
    2024White non-HispanicDemocratic identifiers53.650.856.42,621
    2024WomenDemocratic identifiers55.953.258.72,627
    2024Age 65 and overDemocratic identifiers25.122.627.52,543
    2024Four-year degree or moreRepublican identifiers27.224.729.82,436
    2024White non-HispanicRepublican identifiers77.775.380.12,428
    2024WomenRepublican identifiers46.343.549.22,440
    2024Age 65 and overRepublican identifiers23.320.825.82,316
    2024Four-year degree or moreIndependents with no party lean18.212.523.9378
    2024White non-HispanicIndependents with no party lean53.145.760.5375
    2024WomenIndependents with no party lean52.344.959.7375
    2024Age 65 and overIndependents with no party lean12.47.317.4356
    2020Four-year degree or moreAll respondents36.735.238.18,149
    2020White non-HispanicAll respondents65.764.367.18,178
    2020WomenAll respondents51.850.353.38,213
    2020Age 65 and overAll respondents22.120.823.37,932
    2020Four-year degree or moreNonvoters17.214.120.31,022
    2020White non-HispanicNonvoters53.349.257.41,027
    2020WomenNonvoters49.845.853.91,031
    2020Age 65 and overNonvoters9.67.112.01,001
    2020Four-year degree or moreVoters40.538.842.26,311
    2020White non-HispanicVoters69.467.871.06,343
    2020WomenVoters52.650.954.36,366
    2020Age 65 and overVoters22.420.923.86,155
    2020Four-year degree or moreDemocratic voters47.144.749.53,461
    2020White non-HispanicDemocratic voters58.155.860.53,481
    2020WomenDemocratic voters54.452.056.83,490
    2020Age 65 and overDemocratic voters21.519.523.53,410
    2020Four-year degree or moreRepublican voters32.029.534.52,526
    2020White non-HispanicRepublican voters85.884.087.72,549
    2020WomenRepublican voters50.347.653.02,553
    2020Age 65 and overRepublican voters24.822.427.12,448
    2020Four-year degree or moreDemocratic identifiers42.039.844.23,787
    2020White non-HispanicDemocratic identifiers52.850.655.03,804
    2020WomenDemocratic identifiers56.554.358.73,816
    2020Age 65 and overDemocratic identifiers21.419.623.23,732
    2020Four-year degree or moreRepublican identifiers33.631.635.73,394
    2020White non-HispanicRepublican identifiers82.781.084.43,409
    2020WomenRepublican identifiers47.645.449.83,425
    2020Age 65 and overRepublican identifiers24.522.626.43,289
    2020Four-year degree or moreIndependents with no party lean26.422.530.3943
    2020White non-HispanicIndependents with no party lean55.350.959.6946
    2020WomenIndependents with no party lean48.243.852.6949
    2020Age 65 and overIndependents with no party lean16.112.819.4897
    In the 2024 default view, 50.0% of Democratic voters held a four-year degree against 43.3% of Democratic identifiers, while Republican voters (27.8%) and Republican identifiers (27.2%) differ little. Nonvoters held a degree at 15.7%. Respondents are adult citizens, so the top row stands in for eligible adults, and voters and nonvoters are self-reported.Note: Party identifiers include leaners (seven-point party identification, 1 to 3 Democratic, 5 to 7 Republican); independents with no party lean are the midpoint.Note: A Democratic voter or identifier appears in more than one row, because the rows are overlapping populations.Source: ANES Cumulative Data File, 2020 and 2024; weighted (weight for all respondents and party identifiers, weight_postelection for voters and nonvoters)

    Degree holders and the highest income third became larger parts of the Democratic coalition

    In 1976 the Republican coalition had the larger share of voters with a four-year degree, 24.2% (95% CI 20.9% to 27.6%)24.2% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters in the groupInterval95% CI 20.9% to 27.6%n650Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationRepublican voters with a four-year degreePeriod1976SourceANES Cumulative Data File of Republican voters against 13.8% (95% CI 11.1% to 16.4%)13.8% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters in the groupInterval95% CI 11.1% to 16.4%n669Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationDemocratic voters with a four-year degreePeriod1976SourceANES Cumulative Data File of Democratic voters, and the larger share of voters in the highest third of the income distribution, 49.4% (95% CI 45.3% to 53.4%)49.4% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters in the groupInterval95% CI 45.3% to 53.4%n615Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationRepublican voters in the highest income thirdPeriod1976SourceANES Cumulative Data File against 33.5% (95% CI 29.8% to 37.3%)33.5% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters in the groupInterval95% CI 29.8% to 37.3%n626Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationDemocratic voters in the highest income thirdPeriod1976SourceANES Cumulative Data File. By 2024 both differences had reversed: 50.0% (95% CI 47.0% to 53.0%)50.0% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters in the groupInterval95% CI 47.0% to 53.0%n2,178Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationDemocratic voters with a four-year degreePeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File of Democratic voters held a degree against 27.8% (95% CI 24.8% to 30.9%)27.8% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters in the groupInterval95% CI 24.8% to 30.9%n1,725Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationRepublican voters with a four-year degreePeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File of Republican voters, and 49.7% (95% CI 46.5% to 52.8%)49.7% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters in the groupInterval95% CI 46.5% to 52.8%n2,026Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationDemocratic voters in the highest income thirdPeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File against 39.9% (95% CI 36.4% to 43.4%)39.9% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters in the groupInterval95% CI 36.4% to 43.4%n1,554Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationRepublican voters in the highest income thirdPeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File were in the highest income third (Figure 4). The income measure is relative: the ANES assigns each respondent to a percentile group of household income within the year's sample, and the chapter uses thirds. The thirds are not constant shares of the electorate, and the highest third was 38.6% (95% CI 37.1% to 40.0%)38.6% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted share of all two-party voters who are in the highest third of the income distributionInterval95% CI 37.1% to 40.0%n4,387Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters, in the highest third of the income distributionPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of voters in 1976 to 1988 and 42.9% (95% CI 41.8% to 43.9%)42.9% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted share of all two-party voters who are in the highest third of the income distributionInterval95% CI 41.8% to 43.9%n16,144Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters, in the highest third of the income distributionPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File in 2012 to 2024. Chapter 3.3, The income ladder follows the vote by dollar bracket in the CES.

    The trend figure uses single elections. For comparisons between two periods, the chapter pools four elections at each end, 1976 to 1988 and 2012 to 2024, so that small groups have enough respondents, and it gives each election the same weight. By that comparison the degree-holding share of Democratic voters rose by 24.2 (95% CI 22.0 to 26.4)24.2 percentage pointsEstimandlater minus earlier share of Democratic voters; independent periods, standard errors combinedInterval95% CI 22.0 to 26.4Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, holders of a four-year degreePeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points and that of Republican voters by 6.2 (95% CI 4.0 to 8.5)6.2 percentage pointsEstimandlater minus earlier share of Republican voters; independent periods, standard errors combinedInterval95% CI 4.0 to 8.5Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, holders of a four-year degreePeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points, a smaller rise (Figure 5, education view). The highest income third went from 30.9% (95% CI 28.8% to 32.9%)30.9% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are in the highest third of the income distributionInterval95% CI 28.8% to 32.9%n2,011Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, in the highest third of the income distributionPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 42.6% (95% CI 41.1% to 44.0%)42.6% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are in the highest third of the income distributionInterval95% CI 41.1% to 44.0%n9,236Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, in the highest third of the income distributionPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of Democratic voters and from 45.1% (95% CI 43.0% to 47.1%)45.1% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are in the highest third of the income distributionInterval95% CI 43.0% to 47.1%n2,376Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, in the highest third of the income distributionPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 43.3% (95% CI 41.7% to 44.8%)43.3% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are in the highest third of the income distributionInterval95% CI 41.7% to 44.8%n6,908Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, in the highest third of the income distributionPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of Republican voters. The change in the highest third's share of Democratic voters splits into a group-size term of +3.9 (95% CI 2.3 to 5.5)+3.9 percentage pointsEstimandgroup-size or relative-lean term of the change in the group's share of the party's voters; seeded bootstrap within electionsInterval95% CI 2.3 to 5.5n21,554Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, the highest income thirdPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points and a relative-lean term of +7.8 (95% CI 6.0 to 9.6)+7.8 percentage pointsEstimandgroup-size or relative-lean term of the change in the group's share of the party's voters; seeded bootstrap within electionsInterval95% CI 6.0 to 9.6n21,554Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, the highest income thirdPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points, and for Republican voters into +4.7 (95% CI 2.7 to 6.7)+4.7 percentage pointsEstimandgroup-size or relative-lean term of the change in the group's share of the party's voters; seeded bootstrap within electionsInterval95% CI 2.7 to 6.7n21,554Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, the highest income thirdPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File and −6.5 (95% CI −8.2 to −4.8)−6.5 percentage pointsEstimandgroup-size or relative-lean term of the change in the group's share of the party's voters; seeded bootstrap within electionsInterval95% CI −8.2 to −4.8n21,554Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, the highest income thirdPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File (Figure 7, income views). The CES, which starts in 2008, shows the same direction for Democratic voters: the degree-holding share went from 31.2% (95% CI 30.2% to 32.3%)31.2% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 30.2% to 32.3%n11,519Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, with a four-year degreePeriod2008SourceCooperative Election Study in 2008 to 47.9% (95% CI 46.9% to 49.0%)47.9% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 46.9% to 49.0%n23,517Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, with a four-year degreePeriod2024SourceCooperative Election Study in 2024. Whether the Republican share rose or fell since 2008 depends on the survey, a disagreement taken up near the end.

    Figure 5

    Four-year degree holders rose from 19.2% to 43.4% of Democratic voters and from 25.2% to 31.4% of Republican voters

    Make-up of each party's two-party presidential voters, percent, in 1976 to 1988 and 2012 to 2024 (the buttons switch the dimension); pooled elections; 95% intervals from the Kish effective sample size

    • No four-year degree
    • Four-year degree or more
    Show data
    Data for Four-year degree holders rose from 19.2% to 43.4% of Democratic voters and from 25.2% to 31.4% of Republican voters
    DimensionParty and periodGroupShare of the party's voters (%)95% CI low95% CI highn party votersn in group
    EducationDemocratic voters, 1976 to 1988No four-year degree80.879.182.52,1731,754
    EducationDemocratic voters, 1976 to 1988Four-year degree or more19.217.520.92,173419
    EducationDemocratic voters, 2012 to 2024No four-year degree56.655.258.09,4494,639
    EducationDemocratic voters, 2012 to 2024Four-year degree or more43.442.044.89,4494,810
    EducationRepublican voters, 1976 to 1988No four-year degree74.873.176.52,5631,919
    EducationRepublican voters, 1976 to 1988Four-year degree or more25.223.526.92,563644
    EducationRepublican voters, 2012 to 2024No four-year degree68.667.270.17,1564,340
    EducationRepublican voters, 2012 to 2024Four-year degree or more31.429.932.87,1562,816
    IncomeDemocratic voters, 1976 to 1988Lowest third33.531.435.62,011664
    IncomeDemocratic voters, 1976 to 1988Middle third35.733.537.82,011716
    IncomeDemocratic voters, 1976 to 1988Highest third30.928.832.92,011631
    IncomeDemocratic voters, 2012 to 2024Lowest third24.923.626.29,2362,855
    IncomeDemocratic voters, 2012 to 2024Middle third32.531.233.99,2363,111
    IncomeDemocratic voters, 2012 to 2024Highest third42.641.144.09,2363,270
    IncomeRepublican voters, 1976 to 1988Lowest third20.318.621.92,376474
    IncomeRepublican voters, 1976 to 1988Middle third34.632.736.62,376813
    IncomeRepublican voters, 1976 to 1988Highest third45.143.047.12,3761,089
    IncomeRepublican voters, 2012 to 2024Lowest third21.119.822.46,9081,911
    IncomeRepublican voters, 2012 to 2024Middle third35.634.137.26,9082,506
    IncomeRepublican voters, 2012 to 2024Highest third43.341.744.86,9082,491
    Race and ethnicityDemocratic voters, 1976 to 1988White non-Hispanic72.770.874.62,1791,594
    Race and ethnicityDemocratic voters, 1976 to 1988Black non-Hispanic20.018.321.72,179425
    Race and ethnicityDemocratic voters, 1976 to 1988Hispanic or another race7.36.28.42,179160
    Race and ethnicityDemocratic voters, 2012 to 2024White non-Hispanic58.056.659.49,4935,863
    Race and ethnicityDemocratic voters, 2012 to 2024Black non-Hispanic19.918.721.09,4931,778
    Race and ethnicityDemocratic voters, 2012 to 2024Hispanic or another race22.120.923.39,4931,852
    Race and ethnicityRepublican voters, 1976 to 1988White non-Hispanic94.893.995.72,5702,436
    Race and ethnicityRepublican voters, 1976 to 1988Black non-Hispanic1.30.91.82,57033
    Race and ethnicityRepublican voters, 1976 to 1988Hispanic or another race3.93.14.62,570101
    Race and ethnicityRepublican voters, 2012 to 2024White non-Hispanic85.984.887.07,1906,234
    Race and ethnicityRepublican voters, 2012 to 2024Black non-Hispanic1.61.22.07,19082
    Race and ethnicityRepublican voters, 2012 to 2024Hispanic or another race12.511.513.57,190874
    ReligionDemocratic voters, 1976 to 1988Protestant59.557.461.62,1861,293
    ReligionDemocratic voters, 1976 to 1988Catholic28.026.029.92,186619
    ReligionDemocratic voters, 1976 to 1988Jewish, another religion or none12.611.114.02,186274
    ReligionDemocratic voters, 2012 to 2020Protestant36.034.537.67,3492,676
    ReligionDemocratic voters, 2012 to 2020Catholic21.820.423.17,3491,571
    ReligionDemocratic voters, 2012 to 2020Jewish, another religion or none42.240.643.87,3493,102
    ReligionRepublican voters, 1976 to 1988Protestant68.867.070.72,5691,773
    ReligionRepublican voters, 1976 to 1988Catholic23.121.524.82,569595
    ReligionRepublican voters, 1976 to 1988Jewish, another religion or none8.07.09.12,569201
    ReligionRepublican voters, 2012 to 2020Protestant52.350.554.05,4972,881
    ReligionRepublican voters, 2012 to 2020Catholic22.521.024.05,4971,258
    ReligionRepublican voters, 2012 to 2020Jewish, another religion or none25.223.726.75,4971,358
    AgeDemocratic voters, 1976 to 198818 to 2919.217.620.92,182409
    AgeDemocratic voters, 1976 to 198830 to 4430.628.632.62,182675
    AgeDemocratic voters, 1976 to 198845 to 6431.229.233.12,182687
    AgeDemocratic voters, 1976 to 198865 and over19.017.320.72,182411
    AgeDemocratic voters, 2012 to 202418 to 2918.517.419.69,3041,125
    AgeDemocratic voters, 2012 to 202430 to 4424.623.425.99,3042,255
    AgeDemocratic voters, 2012 to 202445 to 6434.633.235.99,3043,301
    AgeDemocratic voters, 2012 to 202465 and over22.321.123.59,3042,623
    AgeRepublican voters, 1976 to 198818 to 2918.917.420.52,564472
    AgeRepublican voters, 1976 to 198830 to 4433.031.234.92,564851
    AgeRepublican voters, 1976 to 198845 to 6429.627.831.42,564765
    AgeRepublican voters, 1976 to 198865 and over18.516.920.02,564476
    AgeRepublican voters, 2012 to 202418 to 2913.112.014.26,976548
    AgeRepublican voters, 2012 to 202430 to 4421.520.222.86,9761,431
    AgeRepublican voters, 2012 to 202445 to 6440.038.541.66,9762,685
    AgeRepublican voters, 2012 to 202465 and over25.424.026.86,9762,312
    GenderDemocratic voters, 1976 to 1988Women58.656.560.72,1911,286
    GenderDemocratic voters, 1976 to 1988Men41.439.343.52,191905
    GenderDemocratic voters, 2012 to 2024Women55.554.056.99,4955,391
    GenderDemocratic voters, 2012 to 2024Men44.543.146.09,4954,104
    GenderRepublican voters, 1976 to 1988Women53.251.255.22,5791,373
    GenderRepublican voters, 1976 to 1988Men46.844.848.82,5791,206
    GenderRepublican voters, 2012 to 2024Women49.648.051.17,2053,564
    GenderRepublican voters, 2012 to 2024Men50.448.952.07,2053,641
    Each bar shows who is in one party's coalition in one period, and the segments in a bar sum to the whole of the party's voters. In the default view, the four-year degree segment grows in both coalitions and by more in the Democratic one. Segments are shares of the party's voters, not shares of the group voting for the party. The tooltip and the table give the interval for each segment.Note: Each period pools four elections, 1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 against 2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024, and every election has the same total weight. The religion view ends in 2020 because the 2024 religion codes of the cumulative file are unusable.Note: Intervals are model based (Kish effective sample size, normal approximation) and ignore clustering in the sample design.Note: Stacked bars carry no whiskers; the interval and the number of voters in the party's denominator are in the tooltip and the table.Source: ANES Cumulative Data File, 1976 to 1988 and 2012 to 2024; weighted (weight_postelection where the file has one, else weight; each election has the same total weight); two-party presidential voters

    Both coalitions became less white, and both became less Protestant

    White non-Hispanic voters were 72.7% (95% CI 70.8% to 74.6%)72.7% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are white non-HispanicInterval95% CI 70.8% to 74.6%n2,179Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, white non-HispanicPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of Democratic voters and 94.8% (95% CI 93.9% to 95.7%)94.8% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are white non-HispanicInterval95% CI 93.9% to 95.7%n2,570Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, white non-HispanicPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of Republican voters in 1976 to 1988, and 58.0% (95% CI 56.6% to 59.4%)58.0% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are white non-HispanicInterval95% CI 56.6% to 59.4%n9,493Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, white non-HispanicPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File and 85.9% (95% CI 84.8% to 87.0%)85.9% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are white non-HispanicInterval95% CI 84.8% to 87.0%n7,190Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, white non-HispanicPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File in 2012 to 2024. The groups that grew were Hispanic voters and voters of other races, who went from 7.3% (95% CI 6.2% to 8.4%)7.3% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are Hispanic or another raceInterval95% CI 6.2% to 8.4%n2,179Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, Hispanic or another racePeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 22.1% (95% CI 20.9% to 23.3%)22.1% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are Hispanic or another raceInterval95% CI 20.9% to 23.3%n9,493Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, Hispanic or another racePeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of Democratic voters and from 3.9% (95% CI 3.1% to 4.6%)3.9% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are Hispanic or another raceInterval95% CI 3.1% to 4.6%n2,570Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, Hispanic or another racePeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 12.5% (95% CI 11.5% to 13.5%)12.5% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are Hispanic or another raceInterval95% CI 11.5% to 13.5%n7,190Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, Hispanic or another racePeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of Republican voters. Black voters were 20.0% (95% CI 18.3% to 21.7%)20.0% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are Black non-HispanicInterval95% CI 18.3% to 21.7%n2,179Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, Black non-HispanicPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of Democratic voters in the first period and 19.9% (95% CI 18.7% to 21.0%)19.9% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are Black non-HispanicInterval95% CI 18.7% to 21.0%n9,493Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, Black non-HispanicPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File in the second, and a small share of Republican voters in both. Chapter 3.4, Hispanic, Black and Asian voters (planned) follows how those groups voted. This chapter uses only their size in each coalition.

    Protestants were 59.5% (95% CI 57.4% to 61.6%)59.5% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are ProtestantInterval95% CI 57.4% to 61.6%n2,186Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, ProtestantPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of Democratic voters in 1976 to 1988 and 36.0% (95% CI 34.5% to 37.6%)36.0% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are ProtestantInterval95% CI 34.5% to 37.6%n7,349Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, ProtestantPeriod2012, 2016 and 2020 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File in 2012 to 2020, and 68.8% (95% CI 67.0% to 70.7%)68.8% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are ProtestantInterval95% CI 67.0% to 70.7%n2,569Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, ProtestantPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File and 52.3% (95% CI 50.5% to 54.0%)52.3% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are ProtestantInterval95% CI 50.5% to 54.0%n5,497Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, ProtestantPeriod2012, 2016 and 2020 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of Republican voters. The ANES cumulative file cannot separate voters with no religion from those with a religion outside the three it names, and its 2024 religion codes are unusable, so the later period ends in 2020 and the last category is Jewish, another religion or none. The CES separates them. Voters with no religion went from 35.7% (95% CI 34.7% to 36.8%)35.7% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters with no religionInterval95% CI 34.7% to 36.8%n19,015Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters with no religionPeriod2012SourceCooperative Election Study of Democratic voters in 2012 to 45.0% (95% CI 43.9% to 46.0%)45.0% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters with no religionInterval95% CI 43.9% to 46.0%n23,506Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters with no religionPeriod2024SourceCooperative Election Study in 2024, and from 14.5% (95% CI 13.7% to 15.2%)14.5% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters with no religionInterval95% CI 13.7% to 15.2%n18,727Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters with no religionPeriod2012SourceCooperative Election Study to 17.7% (95% CI 16.8% to 18.5%)17.7% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters with no religionInterval95% CI 16.8% to 18.5%n18,485Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters with no religionPeriod2024SourceCooperative Election Study of Republican voters. Chapter 9.1, The god gap in America covers the gap between frequent and infrequent attenders, and Chapter 9.2, The rise of the nones (planned) covers the religiously unaffiliated.

    The oldest age band grew in both coalitions, and women's share fell in both

    Voters in the oldest age band, ages 6565 years of ageEstimandlowest age in the oldest bandWeightsnone (definition)Populationdefinition of an age bandPeriodall yearsSourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement and over, rose from 19.0% (95% CI 17.3% to 20.7%)19.0% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are aged 65 and overInterval95% CI 17.3% to 20.7%n2,182Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, aged 65 and overPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 22.3% (95% CI 21.1% to 23.5%)22.3% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are aged 65 and overInterval95% CI 21.1% to 23.5%n9,304Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, aged 65 and overPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of Democratic voters and from 18.5% (95% CI 16.9% to 20.0%)18.5% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are aged 65 and overInterval95% CI 16.9% to 20.0%n2,564Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, aged 65 and overPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 25.4% (95% CI 24.0% to 26.8%)25.4% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are aged 65 and overInterval95% CI 24.0% to 26.8%n6,976Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, aged 65 and overPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of Republican voters, in step with the aging of the electorate: the CPS puts that band at 15.9% (95% CI 15.7% to 16.0%)15.9% percent of adultsEstimandmean over elections of the weighted share of adults aged 65 or olderInterval95% CI 15.7% to 16.0%n411,495WeightsVOSUPPWTPopulationadults aged 18 or older with a turnout answer (all residents before 1994, citizens after)Period1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988SourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement of adults in 1976 to 1988 and 21.9% (95% CI 21.8% to 22.1%)21.9% percent of adultsEstimandmean over elections of the weighted share of adults aged 65 or olderInterval95% CI 21.8% to 22.1%n342,593WeightsVOSUPPWTPopulationadults aged 18 or older with a turnout answer (all residents before 1994, citizens after)Period2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024SourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement in 2012 to 2024. In 1976 to 1988 the two coalitions had a similar age profile, with the youngest band at 19.2% (95% CI 17.6% to 20.9%)19.2% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are aged 18 to 29Interval95% CI 17.6% to 20.9%n2,182Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, aged 18 to 29Period1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of Democratic voters and 18.9% (95% CI 17.4% to 20.5%)18.9% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are aged 18 to 29Interval95% CI 17.4% to 20.5%n2,564Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, aged 18 to 29Period1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of Republican voters. In 2012 to 2024 the shares were 18.5% (95% CI 17.4% to 19.6%)18.5% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are aged 18 to 29Interval95% CI 17.4% to 19.6%n9,304Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, aged 18 to 29Period2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File and 13.1% (95% CI 12.0% to 14.2%)13.1% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are aged 18 to 29Interval95% CI 12.0% to 14.2%n6,976Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, aged 18 to 29Period2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File, so the Republican coalition had become the older of the two. Chapter 3.6, Age and generation separates age from birth cohort.

    Women were 58.6% (95% CI 56.5% to 60.7%)58.6% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are womenInterval95% CI 56.5% to 60.7%n2,191Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, womenPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of Democratic voters and 53.2% (95% CI 51.2% to 55.2%)53.2% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are womenInterval95% CI 51.2% to 55.2%n2,579Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, womenPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of Republican voters in 1976 to 1988 and 55.5% (95% CI 54.0% to 56.9%)55.5% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are womenInterval95% CI 54.0% to 56.9%n9,495Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, womenPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File and 49.6% (95% CI 48.0% to 51.1%)49.6% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters who are womenInterval95% CI 48.0% to 51.1%n7,205Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, womenPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File in 2012 to 2024. Their share of both coalitions fell by about the same amount even though the Democratic share among women rose from 48.4% (95% CI 46.4% to 50.3%)48.4% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 46.4% to 50.3%n2,659Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters who are womenPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 56.9% (95% CI 55.5% to 58.4%)56.9% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 55.5% to 58.4%n8,955Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters who are womenPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File, because women were a smaller share of voters in the ANES's later elections, 55.7% (95% CI 54.2% to 57.1%)55.7% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted share of all two-party voters who are womenInterval95% CI 54.2% to 57.1%n4,770Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters, womenPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File then and 52.8% (95% CI 51.7% to 53.8%)52.8% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted share of all two-party voters who are womenInterval95% CI 51.7% to 53.8%n16,700Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters, womenPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File now. The CPS, over the same two windows, shows women at 53.1% (95% CI 52.9% to 53.3%)53.1% percent of votersEstimandmean over elections of the weighted share of voters who are womenInterval95% CI 52.9% to 53.3%n254,747WeightsVOSUPPWTPopulationvoters among adults aged 18 or older with a turnout answer (all residents before 1994, citizens after)Period1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988SourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement of voters in 1976 to 1988 and 53.3% (95% CI 53.1% to 53.6%)53.3% percent of votersEstimandmean over elections of the weighted share of voters who are womenInterval95% CI 53.1% to 53.6%n221,687WeightsVOSUPPWTPopulationvoters among adults aged 18 or older with a turnout answer (all residents before 1994, citizens after)Period2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024SourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement in 2012 to 2024, with no change beyond sampling error, so the ANES figure for the earlier window is above the CPS figure and the ANES fall belongs to that window. Chapter 3.5, The gender gap in attitudes and votes covers the vote gap between women and men.

    The Democratic share rose more among degree holders than in any other group

    Figure 6 turns to the other denominator, the Democratic share of each group's voters, for the same two periods. Among degree holders the share rose from 39.2% (95% CI 36.2% to 42.2%)39.2% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 36.2% to 42.2%n1,063Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters in the group Four-year degree or morePeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 62.0% (95% CI 60.6% to 63.5%)62.0% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 60.6% to 63.5%n7,626Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters in the group Four-year degree or morePeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File, a rise of 22.8 (95% CI 19.5 to 26.1)22.8 percentage pointsEstimandlater minus earlier Democratic share of degree holders; independent periods, standard errors combinedInterval95% CI 19.5 to 26.1n8,689Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters with a four-year degreePeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points, and the rise is larger than that of every other group once sampling error is allowed for. Among the highest income third the share went from 36.7% (95% CI 34.3% to 39.0%)36.7% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 34.3% to 39.0%n1,720Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters in the group Highest thirdPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 54.0% (95% CI 52.3% to 55.7%)54.0% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 52.3% to 55.7%n5,761Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters in the group Highest thirdPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File and among the youngest age band from 46.4% (95% CI 43.0% to 49.7%)46.4% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 43.0% to 49.7%n881Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters in the group 18 to 29Period1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 62.7% (95% CI 59.5% to 65.8%)62.7% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 59.5% to 65.8%n1,673Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters in the group 18 to 29Period2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File. The lowest income third and Black voters kept nearly the same Democratic share at high levels, 58.3%58.3% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 55.3% to 61.2%n1,138Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters in the group Lowest thirdPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File and 58.5%58.5% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 56.4% to 60.6%n4,766Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters in the group Lowest thirdPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File for the lowest third and 92.8%92.8% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 90.4% to 95.2%n458Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters in the group Black non-HispanicPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File and 93.7%93.7% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 92.0% to 95.4%n1,860Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters in the group Black non-HispanicPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File for Black voters. Education below a degree is not split further, because the cumulative file defines its lower groups differently after 2016. The Democratic share of all voters rose over these years from 45.9% (95% CI 44.5% to 47.4%)45.9% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted Democratic share of all two-party votersInterval95% CI 44.5% to 47.4%n4,770Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential votersPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 54.1% (95% CI 53.1% to 55.2%)54.1% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted Democratic share of all two-party votersInterval95% CI 53.1% to 55.2%n16,784Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential votersPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File, so a group whose share rose by less than that, as white voters' did, moved toward the Democratic candidate by less than the electorate. The later elections also lean Democratic against the certified counts, as the last section shows.

    Figure 6

    The Democratic share rose more among four-year degree holders than in any other group

    Democratic share of each group's two-party presidential voters, percent, 1976 to 1988 and 2012 to 2024; pooled elections; 95% intervals from the Kish effective sample size

    • 1976 to 1988
    • 2012 to 2024
    Show data
    Data for The Democratic share rose more among four-year degree holders than in any other group
    DimensionGroupEarlier period (%)95% CI low earlier95% CI high earliern earlierLater period (%)95% CI low later95% CI high latern laterChange (points)
    EducationNo four-year degree47.846.149.43,67349.347.950.88,979+1.5
    EducationFour-year degree or more39.236.242.21,06362.060.663.57,626+22.8
    Income (relative thirds)Lowest third58.355.361.21,13858.556.460.64,766+0.2
    Income (relative thirds)Middle third46.544.049.11,52952.250.354.05,617+5.6
    Income (relative thirds)Highest third36.734.339.01,72054.052.355.75,761+17.3
    Race and ethnicityWhite non-Hispanic39.437.840.94,03044.443.245.612,097+5.0
    Race and ethnicityBlack non-Hispanic92.890.495.245893.792.095.41,860+0.9
    Race and ethnicityHispanic61.755.068.520472.268.975.41,616+10.4
    Religion (later period 2012 to 2020)Protestant42.440.644.23,06644.742.946.55,557+2.4
    Religion (later period 2012 to 2020)Catholic50.747.853.61,21453.250.755.72,829+2.5
    Religion (later period 2012 to 2020)Jewish, another religion or none57.152.561.647566.364.368.24,460+9.2
    Age18 to 2946.443.049.788162.759.565.81,673+16.3
    Age30 to 4444.141.546.61,52657.855.659.93,686+13.7
    Age45 to 6447.344.649.91,45250.749.052.45,986+3.4
    Age65 and over46.743.350.088751.149.253.14,935+4.5
    GenderWomen48.446.450.32,65956.955.558.48,955+8.6
    GenderMen42.940.745.02,11151.049.552.67,745+8.2
    Among degree holders the share rose by 22.8 points, from 39.2% to 62.0%, and no other group's rise is as large once sampling error is allowed for. Among the highest income third the share went from 36.7% to 54.0% and among the youngest age band from 46.4% to 62.7%. The ring is the earlier period and the dot the later one; the denominator is the group's voters. The Democratic share of all voters rose from 45.9% to 54.1% in these surveys, so a group that rose by less than that moved less than the electorate did.Note: Education is split into degree and no degree only: the cumulative file defines its lower education groups differently after 2016. The other-races group has too few respondents in the earlier period to publish (fewer than 100) and has no row. Hispanic respondents are identified in the ANES from 1966.Note: The ANES late-period elections lean Democratic relative to the certified counts (see the last section), so the later dots are higher than a count-based benchmark would give. Intervals are model based (Kish effective sample size, normal approximation) and ignore clustering in the sample design.Note: Each period pools four elections, 1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 against 2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024, and every election has the same total weight. The religion rows compare 1976 to 1988 with 2012 to 2020.Source: ANES Cumulative Data File, 1976 to 1988 and 2012 to 2024; weighted (weight_postelection where the file has one, else weight; each election has the same total weight); two-party presidential voters

    A coalition share moves with group size and with relative lean

    Figure 7 splits the change in a coalition share into the two terms of the product and starts with degree holders. Their share of all voters rose from 22.4% (95% CI 21.2% to 23.6%)22.4% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted share of all two-party voters who are holders of a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 21.2% to 23.6%n4,736Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters, holders of a four-year degreePeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 37.9% (95% CI 36.9% to 38.9%)37.9% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted share of all two-party voters who are holders of a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 36.9% to 38.9%n16,605Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters, holders of a four-year degreePeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File. Their Democratic share was 39.2% (95% CI 36.2% to 42.2%)39.2% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 36.2% to 42.2%n1,063Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters who are holders of a four-year degreePeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File against 45.9% (95% CI 44.4% to 47.3%)45.9% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted Democratic share of two-party voters with a known degree statusInterval95% CI 44.4% to 47.3%n4,736Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential votersPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File for all voters in 1976 to 1988 and 62.0% (95% CI 60.6% to 63.5%)62.0% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 60.6% to 63.5%n7,626Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters who are holders of a four-year degreePeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File against 54.1% (95% CI 53.1% to 55.2%)54.1% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted Democratic share of two-party voters with a known degree statusInterval95% CI 53.1% to 55.2%n16,605Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential votersPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File in 2012 to 2024. The degree-holding share of Democratic voters rose by 24.2 (95% CI 22.0 to 26.4)24.2 percentage pointsEstimandlater minus earlier share of Democratic voters; independent periods, standard errors combinedInterval95% CI 22.0 to 26.4Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, holders of a four-year degreePeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points, and the group-size term is +15.5 (95% CI 14.0 to 17.1)+15.5 percentage pointsEstimandgroup-size or relative-lean term of the change in the group's share of the party's voters; seeded bootstrap within electionsInterval95% CI 14.0 to 17.1n21,554Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, degree holdersPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points and the relative-lean term +8.8 (95% CI 7.1 to 10.6)+8.8 percentage pointsEstimandgroup-size or relative-lean term of the change in the group's share of the party's voters; seeded bootstrap within electionsInterval95% CI 7.1 to 10.6n21,554Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, degree holdersPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File. Among Republican voters the group-size term is +15.1 (95% CI 13.6 to 16.7)+15.1 percentage pointsEstimandgroup-size or relative-lean term of the change in the group's share of the party's voters; seeded bootstrap within electionsInterval95% CI 13.6 to 16.7n21,554Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, degree holdersPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File, close to the Democratic one, and the lean term is −8.9 (95% CI −10.6 to −7.4)−8.9 percentage pointsEstimandgroup-size or relative-lean term of the change in the group's share of the party's voters; seeded bootstrap within electionsInterval95% CI −10.6 to −7.4n21,554Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, degree holdersPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File.The terms use the symmetric split of a product: the change in group size times the average relative lean, plus the change in relative lean times the average group size. The split is exact, and its two terms do not depend on which factor is moved first. Kitagawa's standardization of a difference between two rates is built the same way [5]. Intervals come from a bootstrap that resamples respondents within each election. The group-size term is about the same in both coalitions, and the relative-lean term has opposite signs, positive for Democratic voters and negative for Republican voters. The CES gives the same signs for 2008 to 2024, with a group-size term of +13.1 (95% CI 12.0 to 14.1)+13.1 percentage pointsEstimandgroup-size or relative-lean term of the change in the degree-holding share of the party's voters; seeded bootstrap within electionsInterval95% CI 12.0 to 14.1n65,593Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, degree holdersPeriod2008 to 2024SourceCooperative Election Study points for Democratic voters and +10.8 (95% CI 9.8 to 11.7)+10.8 percentage pointsEstimandgroup-size or relative-lean term of the change in the degree-holding share of the party's voters; seeded bootstrap within electionsInterval95% CI 9.8 to 11.7n65,593Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, degree holdersPeriod2008 to 2024SourceCooperative Election Study for Republican voters and lean terms of +3.5 (95% CI 2.5 to 4.5)+3.5 percentage pointsEstimandgroup-size or relative-lean term of the change in the degree-holding share of the party's voters; seeded bootstrap within electionsInterval95% CI 2.5 to 4.5n65,593Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, degree holdersPeriod2008 to 2024SourceCooperative Election Study and −3.0 (95% CI −4.0 to −1.9)−3.0 percentage pointsEstimandgroup-size or relative-lean term of the change in the degree-holding share of the party's voters; seeded bootstrap within electionsInterval95% CI −4.0 to −1.9n65,593Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, degree holdersPeriod2008 to 2024SourceCooperative Election Study.

    Figure 7

    Among Democratic voters the degree-holding share rose through group size (+15.5 points) and relative lean (+8.8 points)

    Change in a group's share of a party's two-party presidential voters from 1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024, split into group size and relative lean, percent and percentage points; ANES; the buttons switch group and party

    Show data
    Data for Among Democratic voters the degree-holding share rose through group size (+15.5 points) and relative lean (+8.8 points)
    GroupParty's votersStepValue95% CI low95% CI highn
    Degree holdersDemocratic votersShare of Democratic voters, 1976 to 198819.217.520.92,173
    Degree holdersDemocratic votersGroup size15.514.017.121,554
    Degree holdersDemocratic votersRelative lean8.87.110.621,554
    Degree holdersDemocratic votersShare of Democratic voters, 2012 to 202443.442.044.89,449
    Degree holdersRepublican votersShare of Republican voters, 1976 to 198825.223.526.92,563
    Degree holdersRepublican votersGroup size15.113.616.721,554
    Degree holdersRepublican votersRelative lean−8.9−10.6−7.421,554
    Degree holdersRepublican votersShare of Republican voters, 2012 to 202431.429.932.87,156
    White non-Hispanic votersDemocratic votersShare of Democratic voters, 1976 to 198872.770.874.62,179
    White non-Hispanic votersDemocratic votersGroup size−11.6−12.8−10.421,554
    White non-Hispanic votersDemocratic votersRelative lean−3.1−4.6−1.521,554
    White non-Hispanic votersDemocratic votersShare of Democratic voters, 2012 to 202458.056.659.49,493
    White non-Hispanic votersRepublican votersShare of Republican voters, 1976 to 198894.893.995.72,570
    White non-Hispanic votersRepublican votersGroup size−16.2−17.8−14.521,554
    White non-Hispanic votersRepublican votersRelative lean7.35.78.921,554
    White non-Hispanic votersRepublican votersShare of Republican voters, 2012 to 202485.984.887.07,190
    Highest income thirdDemocratic votersShare of Democratic voters, 1976 to 198830.928.832.92,011
    Highest income thirdDemocratic votersGroup size3.92.35.521,554
    Highest income thirdDemocratic votersRelative lean7.86.09.621,554
    Highest income thirdDemocratic votersShare of Democratic voters, 2012 to 202442.641.144.09,236
    Highest income thirdRepublican votersShare of Republican voters, 1976 to 198845.143.047.12,376
    Highest income thirdRepublican votersGroup size4.72.76.721,554
    Highest income thirdRepublican votersRelative lean−6.5−8.2−4.821,554
    Highest income thirdRepublican votersShare of Republican voters, 2012 to 202443.341.744.86,908
    The first bar is the group's share of the party's voters in 1976 to 1988 and the last bar is its share in 2012 to 2024. The two steps between them are the change from the group's share of all voters (group size) and the change from the group's Democratic share relative to the Democratic share of all voters (relative lean); they add exactly to the change. The default view is degree holders among Democratic voters, and the buttons show degree holders among Republican voters and the same split for white voters and for the highest income third.Note: The start and end bars carry Kish intervals. The two steps carry percentile intervals from a bootstrap that resamples respondents within each election (400 replicates, seed 12345).Note: The split is symmetric: the change in group size times the average relative lean, plus the change in relative lean times the average group size. Relative lean is the group's Democratic (or Republican) share divided by the party's share of all voters.Source: ANES Cumulative Data File, 1976 to 1988 and 2012 to 2024; weighted (weight_postelection where the file has one, else weight; each election has the same total weight); two-party presidential voters

    The split for white voters runs the other way. White non-Hispanic voters fell from 84.7% (95% CI 83.6% to 85.7%)84.7% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted share of all two-party voters who are white non-HispanicInterval95% CI 83.6% to 85.7%n4,749Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters, white non-HispanicPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 70.8% (95% CI 69.8% to 71.7%)70.8% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted share of all two-party voters who are white non-HispanicInterval95% CI 69.8% to 71.7%n16,683Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters, white non-HispanicPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of all voters, which gives a group-size term of −11.6 (95% CI −12.8 to −10.4)−11.6 percentage pointsEstimandgroup-size or relative-lean term of the change in the group's share of the party's voters; seeded bootstrap within electionsInterval95% CI −12.8 to −10.4n21,554Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, white non-HispanicPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points for Democratic voters. Their Democratic share rose, from 39.4% (95% CI 37.8% to 40.9%)39.4% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 37.8% to 40.9%n4,030Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters who are white non-HispanicPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 44.4% (95% CI 43.2% to 45.6%)44.4% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 43.2% to 45.6%n12,097Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters who are white non-HispanicPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File, but by less than the Democratic share of all voters, so their relative lean fell and that term is −3.1 (95% CI −4.6 to −1.5)−3.1 percentage pointsEstimandgroup-size or relative-lean term of the change in the group's share of the party's voters; seeded bootstrap within electionsInterval95% CI −4.6 to −1.5n21,554Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, white non-HispanicPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points. Among Republican voters the group-size term is −16.2 (95% CI −17.8 to −14.5)−16.2 percentage pointsEstimandgroup-size or relative-lean term of the change in the group's share of the party's voters; seeded bootstrap within electionsInterval95% CI −17.8 to −14.5n21,554Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, white non-HispanicPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points and the lean term is +7.3 (95% CI 5.7 to 8.9)+7.3 percentage pointsEstimandgroup-size or relative-lean term of the change in the group's share of the party's voters; seeded bootstrap within electionsInterval95% CI 5.7 to 8.9n21,554Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, white non-HispanicPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File. A group's share of all voters is its share of adults weighted by its turnout, so the CPS bears on the group-size term. Over the same two windows, 1976 to 1988 and 2012 to 2024, the degree-holding share rose by 18.9 (95% CI 18.6 to 19.2)18.9 percentage pointsEstimandlater minus earlier degree-holding share of voters; mean of the election estimatesInterval95% CI 18.6 to 19.2n476,434WeightsVOSUPPWTPopulationvoters among adults aged 18 or older with a turnout answer (all residents before 1994, citizens after)Period1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement points among voters and by 17.0 (95% CI 16.8 to 17.2)17.0 percentage pointsEstimandlater minus earlier degree-holding share of adults; mean of the election estimatesInterval95% CI 16.8 to 17.2n754,088WeightsVOSUPPWTPopulationadults aged 18 or older with a turnout answer (all residents before 1994, citizens after)Period1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement points among adults aged 1818 years of ageEstimandlowest age in the youngest bandWeightsnone (definition)Populationdefinition of an age bandPeriodall yearsSourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement or older, so growth of the group among adults accounts for most of the rise among voters. Before 1994 the CPS does not record citizenship, so the earlier window counts all residents and the later window counts citizens.

    A change in a group's vote share does not identify persuasion

    The Democratic share of all voters rose from 45.9% (95% CI 44.5% to 47.4%)45.9% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted Democratic share of all two-party votersInterval95% CI 44.5% to 47.4%n4,770Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential votersPeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 54.1% (95% CI 53.1% to 55.2%)54.1% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted Democratic share of all two-party votersInterval95% CI 53.1% to 55.2%n16,784Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential votersPeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File between the two periods, a rise of 8.2 (95% CI 6.4 to 10.0)8.2 percentage pointsEstimandlater minus earlier Democratic share of all two-party voters; independent periods, standard errors combinedInterval95% CI 6.4 to 10.0n21,554Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential votersPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points. Figure 8 splits that change using cells defined by sex, three racial and ethnic groups and four age bands. The split is an accounting identity under those cells: it divides the change into two parts that sum to it and does not say why either part moved. The mix term, the part that comes from a different make-up of the voters across cells, is +2.9 (95% CI 2.1 to 3.8)+2.9 percentage pointsEstimandchange in the Democratic share from the change in the mix of voters across sex, race and age cells; seeded bootstrapInterval95% CI 2.1 to 3.8n21,554Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationall two-party votersPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points, and the within-cell term is +5.3 (95% CI 3.6 to 6.8)+5.3 percentage pointsEstimandchange in the Democratic share from the change inside sex, race and age cells; seeded bootstrapInterval95% CI 3.6 to 6.8n21,554Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationall two-party votersPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points. The within-cell term is not a measure of persuasion. It includes voters who changed their vote, new voters who replaced those who died, different people voting in the same cell from one election to the next, and changes in how the surveys sampled each cell. Repeated cross-sections cannot separate these.

    The within-cell term also contains survey lean. The ANES share minus the certified count averaged +0.2 (95% CI −1.3 to 1.6)+0.2 percentage pointsEstimandmean over elections of the ANES Democratic share of the two-party vote minus the certified share; election errors combinedInterval95% CI −1.3 to 1.6n4,770Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationANES minus certified count, mean over the electionsPeriod1976 to 1988SourceANES Cumulative Data File points over 1976 to 1988 and +3.0 (95% CI 1.9 to 4.0)+3.0 percentage pointsEstimandmean over elections of the ANES Democratic share of the two-party vote minus the certified share; election errors combinedInterval95% CI 1.9 to 4.0n16,784Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationANES minus certified count, mean over the electionsPeriod2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File over 2012 to 2024, a movement of 2.8 (95% CI 1.0 to 4.6)2.8 percentage pointsEstimandchange between the two sets of elections in the mean ANES-minus-certified gap; election errors combinedInterval95% CI 1.0 to 4.6n21,554Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationANES minus certified count, later mean minus earlier meanPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points, while the certified Democratic share rose by 5.45.4 percentage pointsEstimandmean certified Democratic share of the two-party vote in 2012 to 2024 minus the mean in 1976 to 1988Weightsnone (full counts)Populationall votes cast for the two major-party candidatesPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceState presidential returns points between the two sets of elections and the ANES share by 8.2 (95% CI 6.4 to 10.0)8.2 percentage pointsEstimandlater minus earlier Democratic share of all two-party voters; independent periods, standard errors combinedInterval95% CI 6.4 to 10.0n21,554Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential votersPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File. As much as 2.82.8 percentage pointsEstimandchange between the two sets of elections in the mean ANES-minus-certified gap; election errors combinedInterval95% CI 1.0 to 4.6n21,554Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationANES minus certified count, later mean minus earlier meanPeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points of the within-cell term could therefore come from the surveys' lean and not from a change in how people voted.

    Figure 8

    The mix of voters accounts for +2.9 points of the change in the Democratic share and change within groups of the same sex, race and age for +5.3 points

    Change in the Democratic share of two-party presidential voters from 1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024, split into the mix of voters across sex, race and age cells and change within cells, percent and percentage points; ANES; the buttons switch the voters

    Show data
    Data for The mix of voters accounts for +2.9 points of the change in the Democratic share and change within groups of the same sex, race and age for +5.3 points
    VotersStepValue95% CI low95% CI highn
    All two-party votersDemocratic share, 1976 to 198845.944.547.44,770
    All two-party votersChange in the mix of voters2.92.13.821,554
    All two-party votersChange within groups of the same sex, race and age5.33.66.821,554
    All two-party votersDemocratic share, 2012 to 202454.153.155.216,784
    Voters with a four-year degreeDemocratic share, 1976 to 198839.236.242.21,063
    Voters with a four-year degreeChange in the mix of voters1.1−0.12.98,689
    Voters with a four-year degreeChange within groups of the same sex, race and age21.718.024.88,689
    Voters with a four-year degreeDemocratic share, 2012 to 202462.060.663.57,626
    Voters without a four-year degreeDemocratic share, 1976 to 198847.846.149.43,673
    Voters without a four-year degreeChange in the mix of voters4.73.55.912,652
    Voters without a four-year degreeChange within groups of the same sex, race and age−3.2−5.4−1.512,652
    Voters without a four-year degreeDemocratic share, 2012 to 202449.347.950.88,979
    The first bar is the Democratic share in 1976 to 1988 and the last bar is the share in 2012 to 2024. The first step is the part of the change that comes from a different mix of voters across cells of sex, race and ethnicity (three groups) and age (four bands), and the second step is the part that comes from a different Democratic share inside the cells. The split is an accounting identity under these cells. The second step is not a measure of persuasion: it also holds replacement of voters, a different set of people voting, survey lean and sampling change. The buttons restrict the voters by degree.Note: The first and last bars carry Kish intervals and the two steps carry bootstrap intervals. The cells combine sex, race and ethnicity (white non-Hispanic, Black non-Hispanic, Hispanic or another race) and four age bands; a respondent with a missing value forms a cell of its own. A cell with no respondents in one period takes the other period's Democratic share, so it adds nothing to the within-cell term.Note: Intervals come from a bootstrap that resamples respondents within each election (400 replicates, seed 12345). The split is symmetric between the mix and the within-cell change.Source: ANES Cumulative Data File, 1976 to 1988 and 2012 to 2024; weighted (weight_postelection where the file has one, else weight; each election has the same total weight); two-party presidential voters

    Inside a narrower group the split can look different. Among degree holders the Democratic share rose from 39.2% (95% CI 36.2% to 42.2%)39.2% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 36.2% to 42.2%n1,063Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters who are holders of a four-year degreePeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 62.0% (95% CI 60.6% to 63.5%)62.0% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 60.6% to 63.5%n7,626Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters who are holders of a four-year degreePeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File, the mix term is +1.1 (95% CI −0.1 to 2.9)+1.1 percentage pointsEstimandchange in the Democratic share from the change in the mix of voters across sex, race and age cells; seeded bootstrapInterval95% CI −0.1 to 2.9n8,689Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party voters with a four-year degreePeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points and the within-cell term +21.7 (95% CI 18.0 to 24.8)+21.7 percentage pointsEstimandchange in the Democratic share from the change inside sex, race and age cells; seeded bootstrapInterval95% CI 18.0 to 24.8n8,689Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party voters with a four-year degreePeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File, so the sex, race and age make-up of graduates accounts for little of the rise. That does not make the rise persuasion, and the cells do not hold the group's own size fixed: degree holders went from 22.4%22.4% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted share of all two-party voters who are holders of a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 21.2% to 23.6%n4,736Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters, holders of a four-year degreePeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 37.9%37.9% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted share of all two-party voters who are holders of a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 36.9% to 38.9%n16,605Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters, holders of a four-year degreePeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File of voters. Among voters without a degree the Democratic share barely moved, from 47.8% (95% CI 46.1% to 49.4%)47.8% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 46.1% to 49.4%n3,673Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters who are without a four-year degreePeriod1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File to 49.3% (95% CI 47.9% to 50.8%)49.3% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 47.9% to 50.8%n8,979Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party presidential voters who are without a four-year degreePeriod2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 pooledSourceANES Cumulative Data File, and the flat total hides a mix term of +4.7 (95% CI 3.5 to 5.9)+4.7 percentage pointsEstimandchange in the Democratic share from the change in the mix of voters across sex, race and age cells; seeded bootstrapInterval95% CI 3.5 to 5.9n12,652Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party voters without a four-year degreePeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points and a within-cell term of −3.2 (95% CI −5.4 to −1.5)−3.2 percentage pointsEstimandchange in the Democratic share from the change inside sex, race and age cells; seeded bootstrapInterval95% CI −5.4 to −1.5n12,652Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z); pooled periods give each election the same total weightPopulationtwo-party voters without a four-year degreePeriod1976 to 1988 to 2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points.

    Turnout enters in two places. The voters here reported voting, so a group's Democratic share can move because more or fewer of its Democratic-leaning members voted, and a group's share of voters moves with its share of eligible adults and its turnout. The surveys hold no vote preference for nonvoters, so the chapter cannot say how the coalitions would look if they had voted. Chapter 1.4, Cohort change in partisan sorting separates switching from replacement for ideology by following birth cohorts, which these vote questions are too thin to support.

    The surveys differ on levels, and the differences reach the coalition shares

    Self-reported vote can lean toward one party, and the surveys here do not lean equally. In 2024 the ANES gives a Democratic share of the two-party vote of 54.5% (95% CI 52.3% to 56.7%)54.5% percent of the two-party voteEstimandweighted Democratic share of two-party votersInterval95% CI 52.3% to 56.7%n3,933Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)Populationtwo-party presidential voters (ANES)Period2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File and the CES gives 49.0% (95% CI 48.2% to 49.7%)49.0% percent of the two-party voteEstimandweighted Democratic share of two-party votersInterval95% CI 48.2% to 49.7%n42,008Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationtwo-party presidential voters (CES)Period2024SourceCooperative Election Study, against 49.2%49.2% percent of the two-party voteEstimandcertified Democratic share of the two-party voteWeightsnone (full counts)Populationall votes cast for the two major-party candidatesPeriod2024SourceState presidential returns in the certified count. The ANES share minus the count averages +3.0 (95% CI 1.9 to 4.0)+3.0 percentage pointsEstimandmean over elections of the ANES Democratic share of the two-party vote minus the certified share; election errors combinedInterval95% CI 1.9 to 4.0n16,784Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationANES minus certified count, mean over the electionsPeriod2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points over the four elections from 2012 to 2024 and +0.2 (95% CI −1.3 to 1.6)+0.2 percentage pointsEstimandmean over elections of the ANES Democratic share of the two-party vote minus the certified share; election errors combinedInterval95% CI −1.3 to 1.6n4,770Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationANES minus certified count, mean over the electionsPeriod1976 to 1988SourceANES Cumulative Data File points over those from 1976 to 1988, so the ANES changes in vote shares between the two periods are larger than the change in the count. Comparisons of survey reports with voter records are the usual check on self-reported turnout and vote [6], and neither is available for these files.

    The composition of voters differs as well (Figure 9). In 2024 the CPS gives 44.9% (95% CI 44.4% to 45.4%)44.9% percent of votersEstimandweighted share with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 44.4% to 45.4%n48,387WeightsVOSUPPWTPopulationvoters, citizens aged 18 or older, with a four-year degreePeriod2024SourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement of voters with a degree, the ANES 39.9% (95% CI 37.7% to 42.1%)39.9% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted share with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 37.7% to 42.1%n3,903Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)Populationtwo-party presidential voters, with a four-year degreePeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File and the CES 41.8% (95% CI 41.1% to 42.5%)41.8% percent of all two-party votersEstimandweighted share with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 41.1% to 42.5%n42,008Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationtwo-party presidential voters, with a four-year degreePeriod2024SourceCooperative Election Study. The two surveys disagree most about Republican voters: the ANES degree-holding share fell from 36.4% (95% CI 31.6% to 41.1%)36.4% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 31.6% to 41.1%n513Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, with a four-year degreePeriod2008SourceANES Cumulative Data File in 2008 to 27.8% (95% CI 24.8% to 30.9%)27.8% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 24.8% to 30.9%n1,725Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, with a four-year degreePeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File in 2024, a change of −8.5 (95% CI −14.2 to −2.8)−8.5 percentage pointsEstimand2024 minus 2008 share; independent elections, standard errors combinedInterval95% CI −14.2 to −2.8n2,238Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, with a four-year degreePeriod2008 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points, while the CES share rose from 28.2% (95% CI 27.2% to 29.1%)28.2% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 27.2% to 29.1%n12,066Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, with a four-year degreePeriod2008SourceCooperative Election Study to 35.9% (95% CI 34.9% to 37.0%)35.9% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share with a four-year degreeInterval95% CI 34.9% to 37.0%n18,491Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, with a four-year degreePeriod2024SourceCooperative Election Study, a change of +7.8 (95% CI 6.4 to 9.2)+7.8 percentage pointsEstimand2024 minus 2008 share; independent elections, standard errors combinedInterval95% CI 6.4 to 9.2n30,557Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, with a four-year degreePeriod2008 to 2024SourceCooperative Election Study points. The ANES mode series show where the fall sits. The 2008 baseline is face to face only. In the web samples the Republican share went from 31.9% (95% CI 28.6% to 35.2%)31.9% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share with a four-year degree, mode-specific weightInterval95% CI 28.6% to 35.2%n1,263Weightsweight_ftf or weight_web (VCF0009 mode weights)PopulationRepublican two-party voters interviewed on the webPeriod2012SourceANES Cumulative Data File in 2012 to 30.8% (95% CI 25.9% to 35.7%)30.8% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share with a four-year degree, mode-specific weightInterval95% CI 25.9% to 35.7%n571Weightsweight_ftf or weight_web (VCF0009 mode weights)PopulationRepublican two-party voters interviewed on the webPeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File in 2024, a change of −1.1 (95% CI −7.0 to 4.8)−1.1 percentage pointsEstimand2024 minus 2012 degree-holding share; independent elections, standard errors combinedInterval95% CI −7.0 to 4.8n1,834Weightsweight_ftf or weight_web (VCF0009 mode weights)PopulationRepublican two-party voters interviewed on the webPeriod2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points whose interval includes zero, and in the face-to-face samples from 37.9% (95% CI 32.2% to 43.6%)37.9% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share with a four-year degree, mode-specific weightInterval95% CI 32.2% to 43.6%n412Weightsweight_ftf or weight_web (VCF0009 mode weights)PopulationRepublican two-party voters interviewed face to facePeriod2012SourceANES Cumulative Data File to 25.1% (95% CI 18.2% to 31.9%)25.1% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share with a four-year degree, mode-specific weightInterval95% CI 18.2% to 31.9%n301Weightsweight_ftf or weight_web (VCF0009 mode weights)PopulationRepublican two-party voters interviewed face to facePeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File, a change of −12.8 (95% CI −21.8 to −3.9)−12.8 percentage pointsEstimand2024 minus 2012 degree-holding share; independent elections, standard errors combinedInterval95% CI −21.8 to −3.9n713Weightsweight_ftf or weight_web (VCF0009 mode weights)PopulationRepublican two-party voters interviewed face to facePeriod2012 to 2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File points. The fall in the all-mode ANES series is therefore not present in the web samples, which like the CES are collected online, and those samples do not show the CES's rise either. The within-education vote differs too. In 2024 degree holders voted Democratic at 68.2% (95% CI 65.4% to 71.1%)68.2% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 65.4% to 71.1%n2,007Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationANES two-party voters with a four-year degreePeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File in the ANES and 56.1% (95% CI 55.1% to 57.2%)56.1% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 55.1% to 57.2%n16,994Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationCES two-party voters with a four-year degreePeriod2024SourceCooperative Election Study in the CES, and voters without a degree at 45.3% (95% CI 42.2% to 48.5%)45.3% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 42.2% to 48.5%n1,896Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationANES two-party voters without a four-year degreePeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File and 43.8% (95% CI 42.8% to 44.9%)43.8% percent of the group's voters voting DemocraticEstimandweighted Democratic share of the group's two-party votersInterval95% CI 42.8% to 44.9%n25,014Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationCES two-party voters without a four-year degreePeriod2024SourceCooperative Election Study. If the 2024 ANES voters had the CPS education mix and kept their within-education vote shares, degree holders would be 55.1% (95% CI 53.4% to 57.2%)55.1% percent of Democratic votersEstimanddegree share of Democratic voters when voters take the CPS degree share and keep their ANES within-education Democratic shares; seeded bootstrap of ANES respondentsInterval95% CI 53.4% to 57.2%n3,903Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z) (ANES); CPS share treated as knownPopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters, ANES with the CPS education mixPeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File of Democratic voters and 32.1% (95% CI 29.8% to 34.1%)32.1% percent of Republican votersEstimanddegree share of Republican voters when voters take the CPS degree share and keep their ANES within-education Democratic shares; seeded bootstrap of ANES respondentsInterval95% CI 29.8% to 34.1%n3,903Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z) (ANES); CPS share treated as knownPopulationRepublican two-party presidential voters, ANES with the CPS education mixPeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File of Republican voters, against 50.0%50.0% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters in the groupInterval95% CI 47.0% to 53.0%n2,178Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationDemocratic voters with a four-year degreePeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File and 27.8%27.8% percent of Republican votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters in the groupInterval95% CI 24.8% to 30.9%n1,725Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationRepublican voters with a four-year degreePeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File unadjusted. The surveys also differ on race: in 2024 white non-Hispanic voters were 72.3% (95% CI 71.6% to 73.0%)72.3% percent of votersEstimandweighted share of voters in the groupInterval95% CI 71.6% to 73.0%n42,008Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationwhite voters among two-party votersPeriod2024SourceCooperative Election Study of voters in the CES, 70.6% (95% CI 70.1% to 71.1%)70.6% percent of votersEstimandweighted share of voters in the groupInterval95% CI 70.1% to 71.1%n48,387WeightsVOSUPPWTPopulationwhite non-Hispanic voters among all votersPeriod2024SourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement in the CPS and 67.4% (95% CI 65.2% to 69.5%)67.4% percent of votersEstimandweighted share of voters in the groupInterval95% CI 65.2% to 69.5%n3,897Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)Populationwhite non-Hispanic voters among two-party votersPeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File in the ANES, and Black voters were 9.3% (95% CI 8.9% to 9.7%)9.3% percent of votersEstimandweighted share of voters in the groupInterval95% CI 8.9% to 9.7%n42,008Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationBlack voters among two-party votersPeriod2024SourceCooperative Election Study, 11.5% (95% CI 11.1% to 11.8%)11.5% percent of votersEstimandweighted share of voters in the groupInterval95% CI 11.1% to 11.8%n48,387WeightsVOSUPPWTPopulationBlack non-Hispanic voters among all votersPeriod2024SourceCPS Voting and Registration Supplement and 11.2% (95% CI 9.8% to 12.7%)11.2% percent of votersEstimandweighted share of voters in the groupInterval95% CI 9.8% to 12.7%n3,897Weightsweight_postelection where the file has one (1996 to 2008, 2016 to 2024), else weight (VCF0009z)PopulationBlack non-Hispanic voters among two-party votersPeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File.

    Figure 9

    The ANES shows the degree-holding share of Republican voters falling after 2008, the CES shows it rising, and the ANES web samples show no change

    Share of voters with a four-year degree, percent, by presidential election: all voters (CPS, ANES, CES), Democratic voters and Republican voters (ANES, ANES by mode, CES); the buttons show the white and Black shares of voters; 95% intervals from the Kish effective sample size

    Share with a four-year degree (%)

    • CPS voting supplement
    • ANES
    • ANES, face to face
    • ANES, web
    • CES
    All votersDemocratic votersRepublican voters
    Show data
    Data for The ANES shows the degree-holding share of Republican voters falling after 2008, the CES shows it rising, and the ANES web samples show no change
    MeasureVotersSurveyElectionShare (%)95% CI low95% CI highn
    Four-year degreeAll votersCPS voting supplement199629.429.029.850,025
    Four-year degreeAll votersCPS voting supplement200031.230.731.650,010
    Four-year degreeAll votersCPS voting supplement200432.432.032.963,052
    Four-year degreeAll votersCPS voting supplement200834.133.734.659,975
    Four-year degreeAll votersCPS voting supplement201236.636.237.059,597
    Four-year degreeAll votersCPS voting supplement201639.639.240.158,533
    Four-year degreeAll votersCPS voting supplement202041.541.041.955,170
    Four-year degreeAll votersCPS voting supplement202444.944.445.448,387
    Four-year degreeAll votersANES199628.725.631.81,032
    Four-year degreeAll votersANES200030.427.433.41,118
    Four-year degreeAll votersANES200431.327.834.8811
    Four-year degreeAll votersANES200833.330.436.31,533
    Four-year degreeAll votersANES201233.631.735.64,144
    Four-year degreeAll votersANES201637.735.439.92,571
    Four-year degreeAll votersANES202040.438.742.25,987
    Four-year degreeAll votersANES202439.937.742.13,903
    Four-year degreeAll votersANES, face to face200833.330.336.21,533
    Four-year degreeAll votersANES, face to face201235.932.339.51,327
    Four-year degreeAll votersANES, face to face201639.935.544.3745
    Four-year degreeAll votersANES, face to face2020n/an/an/an/a
    Four-year degreeAll votersANES, face to face202441.136.046.2688
    Four-year degreeAll votersANES, web201232.430.134.72,817
    Four-year degreeAll votersANES, web201637.134.539.81,846
    Four-year degreeAll votersANES, web2020n/an/an/an/a
    Four-year degreeAll votersANES, web202442.539.046.01,357
    Four-year degreeAll votersCES200829.829.130.523,585
    Four-year degreeAll votersCES201230.730.031.437,789
    Four-year degreeAll votersCES201630.930.331.540,891
    Four-year degreeAll votersCES202038.838.239.543,872
    Four-year degreeAll votersCES202441.841.142.542,008
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersANES199624.220.428.1599
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersANES200029.325.233.4590
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersANES200431.926.836.9399
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersANES200830.927.234.51,020
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersANES201233.330.735.92,469
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersANES201643.039.846.31,341
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersANES202047.144.749.53,461
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersANES202450.047.053.02,178
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersANES, face to face200830.827.234.51,020
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersANES, face to face201234.129.638.6915
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersANES, face to face201647.140.953.4385
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersANES, face to face2020n/an/an/an/a
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersANES, face to face202454.747.861.7387
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersANES, web201232.929.736.11,554
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersANES, web201641.738.045.4970
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersANES, web2020n/an/an/an/a
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersANES, web202451.046.255.8786
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersCES200831.230.232.311,519
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersCES201232.931.934.019,048
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersCES201636.135.237.022,136
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersCES202045.844.946.626,179
    Four-year degreeDemocratic votersCES202447.946.949.023,517
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersANES199634.929.940.0433
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersANES200031.627.235.9528
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersANES200430.725.835.5412
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersANES200836.431.641.1513
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersANES201234.031.136.91,675
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersANES201631.728.634.81,230
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersANES202032.029.534.52,526
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersANES202427.824.830.91,725
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersANES, face to face200836.231.441.0513
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersANES, face to face201237.932.243.6412
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersANES, face to face201631.825.837.8360
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersANES, face to face2020n/an/an/an/a
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersANES, face to face202425.118.231.9301
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersANES, web201231.928.635.21,263
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersANES, web201632.028.435.6876
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersANES, web2020n/an/an/an/a
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersANES, web202430.825.935.7571
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersCES200828.227.229.112,066
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersCES201228.127.229.118,741
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersCES201625.624.826.418,755
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersCES202031.230.432.017,693
    Four-year degreeRepublican votersCES202435.934.937.018,491
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersCPS voting supplement199682.582.182.850,025
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersCPS voting supplement200080.680.281.050,010
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersCPS voting supplement200479.278.879.663,052
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersCPS voting supplement200876.375.976.759,975
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersCPS voting supplement201273.773.374.159,597
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersCPS voting supplement201673.372.973.758,533
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersCPS voting supplement202071.070.671.555,170
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersCPS voting supplement202470.670.171.148,387
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersANES199678.976.181.61,031
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersANES200077.875.180.61,113
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersANES200474.971.678.1800
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersANES200874.171.476.91,530
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersANES201272.770.974.54,181
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersANES201672.670.674.72,575
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersANES202070.468.872.06,030
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersANES202467.465.269.53,897
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersCES200876.575.877.223,585
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersCES201278.678.079.337,789
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersCES201676.776.277.340,891
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersCES202073.172.673.743,872
    White non-Hispanic votersAll votersCES202472.371.673.042,008
    Black votersAll votersCPS voting supplement199610.610.310.950,025
    Black votersAll votersCPS voting supplement200011.210.911.550,010
    Black votersAll votersCPS voting supplement200411.010.711.363,052
    Black votersAll votersCPS voting supplement200812.111.812.459,975
    Black votersAll votersCPS voting supplement201212.912.613.259,597
    Black votersAll votersCPS voting supplement201611.911.612.258,533
    Black votersAll votersCPS voting supplement202011.711.412.055,170
    Black votersAll votersCPS voting supplement202411.511.111.848,387
    Black votersAll votersANES19969.97.912.01,031
    Black votersAll votersANES200011.29.213.31,113
    Black votersAll votersANES200413.711.116.3800
    Black votersAll votersANES200812.110.014.11,530
    Black votersAll votersANES201213.111.714.44,181
    Black votersAll votersANES201611.29.712.62,575
    Black votersAll votersANES202010.59.411.66,030
    Black votersAll votersANES202411.29.812.73,897
    Black votersAll votersCES200811.611.112.123,585
    Black votersAll votersCES20128.68.29.137,789
    Black votersAll votersCES20169.69.210.040,891
    Black votersAll votersCES202010.610.210.943,872
    Black votersAll votersCES20249.38.99.742,008
    The Republican panel is where the surveys part: from 2008 to 2024 the ANES share changed by −8.5 points and the CES share by +7.8 points. The dashed lines split the ANES by interview mode: the 2008 baseline is face to face only, and between 2012 and 2024 the web share changed by −1.1 points and the face-to-face share by −12.8 points. In 2024 the CPS gives 44.9% of all voters with a degree, the ANES 39.9% and the CES 41.8%. The CPS counts all voters, including third-party voters, and the ANES and the CES count two-party voters.Note: The ANES 2012, 2016 and 2024 samples mix interview modes and the 2020 study has no mode weights, so the mode lines have no 2020 point; the 2008 study was face to face only. The all-mode ANES line includes panel and paper respondents in 2024.Note: The CES is an opt-in panel and its intervals do not cover how respondents were recruited; the CPS intervals ignore the survey design. Intervals are model based (Kish effective sample size, normal approximation) and ignore clustering in the sample design.Source: CPS November voting supplement 1996 to 2024 (weighted, VOSUPPWT); ANES Cumulative Data File 1996 to 2024 (weighted; mode series use weight_ftf and weight_web); CES cumulative file 2008 to 2024 (weighted, weight_cumulative)

    In the 2024 ANES, degree holders were 54.7% (95% CI 47.8% to 61.7%)54.7% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share with a four-year degree, mode-specific weightInterval95% CI 47.8% to 61.7%n387Weightsweight_ftf or weight_web (VCF0009 mode weights)PopulationDemocratic two-party voters interviewed face to facePeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File of Democratic voters among face-to-face respondents and 51.0% (95% CI 46.2% to 55.8%)51.0% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share with a four-year degree, mode-specific weightInterval95% CI 46.2% to 55.8%n786Weightsweight_ftf or weight_web (VCF0009 mode weights)PopulationDemocratic two-party voters interviewed on the webPeriod2024SourceANES Cumulative Data File among web respondents, and the two intervals overlap. Religion shows a gap too: the 2024 ANES Time Series puts voters with no religion at 34.2% (95% CI 31.1% to 37.2%)34.2% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters with no religion (ANES 2024 Time Series summary religion code 9)Interval95% CI 31.1% to 37.2%n2,004Weightsw_post (V240107b)PopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters who say they are not religiousPeriod2024SourceANES 2024 Time Series of Democratic voters and the CES at 45.0% (95% CI 43.9% to 46.0%)45.0% percent of Democratic votersEstimandweighted share of the party's two-party voters with no religionInterval95% CI 43.9% to 46.0%n23,506Weightsweight_cumulativePopulationDemocratic two-party presidential voters with no religionPeriod2024SourceCooperative Election Study. Both surveys show a rise in the degree-holding share of Democratic voters, they disagree about the Republican share, and the levels in either survey are best read as a range.

    What these data cannot show

    The surveys interview different people in each election, so the chapter compares groups and not individuals. It cannot say whether a voter changed party, how much of a change comes from older voters leaving the electorate and younger ones entering it, or how much comes from different people turning out. The group terms of the decompositions are arithmetic and describe a split of numbers, not a mechanism, and the within-cell term in particular absorbs every change that the cells do not hold fixed. The split is also sensitive to the groups chosen: degree holders were a smaller share of voters in the first period than in the second.

    Vote and turnout are self-reports. The ANES leans Democratic in its late elections, the CES is an opt-in panel whose weights match it to the adult population and not to voters, and the CPS has no vote choice, so no survey here measures a party's voters exactly. Nonvoters have no vote preference in these data, third-party voters are outside the two-party frame, and the CES file used here has no validated turnout. The ANES samples of 2012, 2016 and 2024 mix interview modes and the 2020 study has no mode weights, so a change between those elections can include a change of mode. Intervals are model based and leave out the sample designs; the CPS intervals in particular are narrower than the survey's own design-based errors.

    Several groups are coarse. Education below a degree is not analysed, because the ANES cumulative file defines its lower groups differently after 2016. The ANES identifies Hispanic respondents from 1966 and has few of them before the 1990s, so the early race cells pool Hispanic voters with voters of other races for the coalition shares and drop the other-races group for the vote shares. The relative income thirds do not describe dollar income, and religion in the ANES cumulative file stops at 2020 with four categories. The two periods, 1976 to 1988 and 2012 to 2024, were chosen to give each group enough respondents, and a different choice of years would give different numbers. The chapter does not examine why any group's vote changed, how the parties' candidates, issues or campaigns affected it, or how coalitions differ below the national level.


    Data sources

    • ANES Cumulative Data FileCumulative Data File, presidential years 1952 to 2024Years: 1948-2024 (33 study years; even years only after 2004; no 2006, 2010 or 2014 study) · Weights: weight_postelection where available, else VCF0009z · License: Free download after accepting the ANES terms of use; cite the release.
    • ANES 2024 Time Series2024 Time Series, summary religion code, one comparison with the CESYears: 2024 (pre-election and post-election interviews) · Weights: V240107b · License: Free download after accepting the ANES terms of use; cite the release.
    • Cooperative Election StudyCumulative Common Content, presidential years 2008 to 2024Years: 2006-2024 (every year; self-reported turnout is available in the 10 even years) · Weights: weight_cumulative · License: See the provider's terms of use.
    • CPS Voting and Registration SupplementNovember Voting and Registration Supplement, presidential years 1996 to 2024 (and 1976 to 1988 for one comparison), adults aged 18 or olderYears: 1976-2024 (25 November samples, biennial, even years) · Weights: VOSUPPWT · License: IPUMS CPS conditions of use: a free extract after registration, no fee may be charged for the data, IPUMS must be cited, and publications are to be added to the IPUMS bibliography. The underlying Census Bureau data are public domain.
    • State presidential returnsState presidential returns 1976 to 2024, certified national two-party shareYears: 1976-2024 (13 elections) · Weights: none (full counts) · License: See the provider's terms of use.

    All data sources

    Methods

    Sample: ANES Cumulative Data File respondents in the 19 presidential elections from 1952 to 2024 who reported voting for the Democratic or the Republican candidate (34,423 respondents with a positive vote weight); CES cumulative file respondents in 2008, 2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 who reported such a vote (188,145); CPS November voting supplement respondents in the presidential-election years 1996 to 2024 who were citizens aged 18 or older with a positive supplement weight and a turnout answer (eligible adults); for the comparison of the two pooled windows, adults aged 18 or older with a turnout answer in 1976, 1980, 1984, 1988, 2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 (citizenship is recorded from 1994, so the earlier window counts all residents and the later one citizens). Third-party voters and nonvoters are outside the ANES and CES frame. A coalition is a party's two-party voters. Weights: ANES weight_postelection in the elections where the file has one (1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2016, 2020, 2024), otherwise weight (VCF0009z), the rule used by the gender-gap chapter; CES weight_cumulative; CPS VOSUPPWT. A pooled period (1976, 1980, 1984 and 1988; 2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024) divides each election's weights by that election's total vote weight, so every election counts equally. Groups: four-year degree or more against less (ANES college_grad; CES education_4cat College or Post-grad; education below a degree is not split in the ANES because the cumulative file defines its lower groups differently after 2016); relative income thirds (the ANES percentile income groups regrouped into 0 to 33, 34 to 67 and 68 to 100); race and ethnicity from the ANES four-category variable (Hispanic respondents identified from 1966; the other-races group has too few respondents to publish in the earlier period) and the CES five-category variable; religion from the ANES cumulative four-category variable (Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, other or none; the 2024 values are unusable and are not used) and the CES five-category variable (2012 to 2024; the CES religion categories are not comparable between 2008 and 2012, when the Protestant share jumps and the other-religion share falls); age in four bands built from age in years; sex from the survey's two-category variable. Definitions: for a group g, c(g) is the group's share of a party's voters, d(g) the Democratic share of the group's voters, s(g) the group's share of all voters and D the Democratic share of all voters, so that c_D(g) = s(g) d(g) / D and c_R(g) = s(g) (1 - d(g)) / (1 - D). A change in c between two periods splits exactly into a group-size term, (s1 - s0) times the mean of the two relative leans, and a relative-lean term, (r1 - r0) times the mean of the two group shares, with r the relative lean. The vote decomposition splits the change in the Democratic share into a mix term, the sum over cells of sex, race and age (a missing value is its own category) of the change in the cell's weight share times the mean of the two Democratic shares, and a within-cell term, the sum of the change in the cell's Democratic share times the mean of the two weight shares; a cell empty in one period takes the other period's Democratic share. Intervals: 95%. Shares and differences of shares from independent periods use the Kish effective sample size and a normal approximation, with standard errors combined in quadrature; the terms of the two decompositions and the CPS-adjusted degree shares come from a percentile bootstrap that resamples respondents within each election (400 replicates, seed 12345); the CPS voter-minus-eligible difference uses a Taylor linearization with the CPS weights, and the CPS counterfactual (2024 voters with 1996 turnout rates for degree holders and other adults) a bootstrap within year. All intervals are model based. The CES is an opt-in panel and the CPS extract has no replicate weights, so those intervals leave out how respondents were recruited and the survey design. Suppression: a published share needs at least 100 voters in its denominator, a Kish effective sample of at least 100 and at least 30 respondents in the group and party; the other-races vote share in the earlier period (57 respondents) and the 1952 Democratic degree share are dropped. Survey mode: the ANES 2012, 2016 and 2024 samples mix modes and the 2020 study has no mode weights; the text and the survey-check figure report face-to-face and web estimates (2008 is face to face only). Benchmark: the certified two-party share from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab state returns, full counts.

    References

    1. Kish, Leslie (1965). Survey Sampling. John Wiley and Sons.
    2. Axelrod, Robert (1972). Where the Votes Come From: An Analysis of Electoral Coalitions, 1952-1968. American Political Science Review 66(1): 11-20. doi:10.2307/1959275
    3. McDonald, Michael P.; Popkin, Samuel L. (2001). The Myth of the Vanishing Voter. American Political Science Review 95(4): 963-974. doi:10.1017/S0003055400400134
    4. Hur, Aram; Achen, Christopher H. (2013). Coding Voter Turnout Responses in the Current Population Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly 77(4): 985-993. doi:10.1093/poq/nft042
    5. Kitagawa, Evelyn M. (1955). Components of a Difference Between Two Rates. Journal of the American Statistical Association 50(272): 1168-1194. doi:10.1080/01621459.1955.10501299
    6. Ansolabehere, Stephen; Hersh, Eitan (2012). Validation: What Big Data Reveal About Survey Misreporting and the Real Electorate. Political Analysis 20(4): 437-459. doi:10.1093/pan/mps023

    How to cite

    @misc{singh2026thetwocoalitions,
      author = {Singh, Vishal},
      title = {The two coalitions},
      year = {2026},
      url = {https://vishalsingh.org/politics/the-two-coalitions},
      note = {In The Public Mind. Published 3 October 2026.}
    }