Skip to content
Contents
The Public Mind

    Type to search. Planned chapters match by title only.

    The Public Mind

    Start here

    What the book is, how its numbers are made, and where to begin.

    The Public Mind is a book about American politics told through survey data, election returns and campaign finance records. Each chapter asks one question, answers it with figures, and ends with what the data cannot show. The first volume follows how party identity absorbed ideology, feeling, social groups and issues. The second asks what left and right mean and what lies beneath them, in the United States, Europe and beyond. The third reads the political map of counties, neighborhoods and money.

    41 of 91 chapters are written, all of them drafts that are still being checked. The other 50 are planned: each shows the question it will ask and the data it will use, and states no result.

    Three ways in

    1. Read in orderBegin with the introduction, Party, belief and the political map, and follow the book part by part.
    2. Start with the map5 chapters that read the vote through the county map.
    3. Take the grand tour15 chapters, one from each part.

    All chapters lists every chapter with its data and status. Explorers are interactive tools that sit beside the parts, and Reference holds the data sources, glossary, figure gallery and methods.

    A figure from the book

    From Chapter 10.2, Distance from the national vote, 1868 to 2024

    In 2024, 79.1% of counties were 20 or more points from the national margin, against 37.3% in 1976

    County two-party margin minus the national two-party margin of the same election, percentage points (positive is more Democratic than the nation), seven presidential elections from 1876 to 2024

    Loading county values

    County margin minus national margin, points (negative is more Republican, positive is more Democratic)

    More RepublicanMore Democratic

    Values outside −60 to +60 take the end colors.

    No data (3,143 counties)

    Select a class to show only those places.

    Hover or tap a county for its value, or search by name. Zoom with the buttons on the map, then drag to move it.

    • Alaska draws as no data. Its election returns are reported by election district, and the district codes cannot be matched to boroughs and census areas.
    Pale counties voted close to the nation, and the two darkest shades of each color are 20 points or more from it. Blue counties were more Democratic than the nation and red counties more Republican, whatever the winner of the county. The map opens on 2024, when 2,234 of the 2,463 far counties are red and 229 are blue; move the slider to see 1976, when most counties in the Northeast, Midwest and West are within 20 points of the national margin, and 1904 and 1940, when most counties in the former Confederacy were far on the Democratic side. Counties differ in size: the average far Democratic county cast 9.8 times as many votes as the average far Republican county, so area overstates the votes of far Republican counties. The tooltip also gives the county's own margin.Note: Counties are drawn on 2020 boundaries and joined on FIPS code. A county with no return, or whose code is absent from the 2020 map, draws as no data: not counting Alaska, 885 of the 3,113 counties on the map have no return in 1876 and 393 have none in 1904, and no other frame has more than 26, after retired county codes are mapped to their 2020 successors. None of the seven elections is a third-party year. The classes break at minus and plus 40, 20 and 5 points.Source: County presidential returns, 1868-2024 (Algara and Amlani for 1868-2020, MIT Election Data and Science Lab for 2024); full counts, not survey estimates; shares weighted by two-party votes unless stated

    The three volumes

    Volume 1

    The great sorting

    How closely party identity came to line up with ideology, partisan feeling, social groups and issue positions in the United States, 1948 to 2024.

    1. Part I

      The sort

      Party identification and ideological labels became more closely aligned, including within birth cohorts, and party gaps on different issues opened on different schedules.

      3 written, 4 planned

    2. Part II

      Partisan feeling

      Warmth toward one's own party moved little while warmth toward the other party fell, in every group examined.

      2 written, 2 planned

    3. Part III

      The party coalitions

      Who votes for each party changed along education, income, race, gender and age.

      6 written, 1 planned

    4. Part IV

      Issue by issue

      Each issue has its own partisan gap, its own timing and its own demographic profile.

      5 written, 3 planned · Issues explorer

    5. Part V

      Race and racial attitudes

      Racial attitudes changed on different schedules by kind of item and became part of partisan and ideological identity.

      2 written, 2 planned

    6. Part VI

      Trust, science and democracy

      Confidence in institutions sorted by party, institution by institution, while stated support for democracy held.

      4 written, 4 planned

    Volume 2

    Ideology, values and religion

    What left and right mean, the values and dispositions beneath them, and the religious divide, in the United States, Europe and about 100 countries.

    1. Part VII

      What left and right mean

      The left-right label has different contents in different countries and a loose fit with what people want.

      2 written, 4 planned

    2. Part VIII

      Values beneath politics

      Basic values and dispositions lean left or right modestly where left and right are structured, and differently elsewhere.

      2 written, 5 planned · World values explorer

    3. Part IX

      Religion and morality

      The religious line in politics runs through attendance rather than denomination, most steeply in the United States.

      2 written, 3 planned

    Volume 3

    The political map

    Counties, neighborhoods, hardship and money: what the map of the American vote records and what it cannot show.

    1. Part X

      The nationalized map

      County swings collapsed onto one national number, and the county vote now follows composition.

      3 written, 2 planned · Elections, 1976 to 2024 explorer

    2. Part XI

      Below the county line

      A county margin is an average over precincts that are often far more lopsided than the county.

      1 written, 1 planned · Neighborhoods explorer

    3. Part XII

      Demographic axes of the vote

      Education, income, ethnicity and rurality each relate to the county vote differently from what the raw correlation suggests.

      4 written, 3 planned

    4. Part XIII

      Hardship, health and the vote

      Different kinds of hardship relate to the vote in different directions, and some relations vanish once race and education are held fixed.

      2 written, 6 planned

    5. Part XIV

      The money map

      Campaign donors are concentrated in a few hundred college-heavy counties, and their pool sorted before the electorate did.

      2 written, 5 planned

    6. Part XV

      Place and opinion

      Within a party, where someone lives says far less about their views than which party they belong to.

      1 written, 5 planned

    Rules of evidence

    Survey estimates are weighted, and each one carries a confidence interval and the number of respondents behind it. Hover over or focus any number in the text to see its estimand, interval, sample size, weights and source. No number in the prose is typed by hand. Each is printed from a data file that the analysis writes, so a number in the text cannot differ from the number in the figure through a transcription error. The file does not check that a sentence names the right population, denominator or interpretation for that number, and those are reviewed separately. A figure's "Show data" table lists the exact values behind every mark.

    The language is descriptive. A chapter says that one group is more likely than another, or that a gap widened, and does not say that one thing caused another unless the design supports it. Maps describe the composition of places. A county that votes one way says nothing about any one voter in it.

    The grain ladder

    Every chapter is labeled with its grain, which sets what a claim can be about. Two units can differ inside one chapter. The unit of estimation is what each row of the data is. The unit of comparison is what the chapter sets side by side once the estimates are made.

    GrainEach row of the data isThe chapter comparesClaims are about
    Individualsa person in a survey, or a donor in the campaign finance recordsgroups of people, years or surveysthe people in the data and the groups they belong to
    Placesa county, precinct or neighborhoodplaces, or one place over timeplaces
    Countriesa person in a survey, with each estimate made among the people of one countrythose estimates across countrieshow a relationship or a gap differs from one country to another
    Officeholdersa candidate or an officeholder, such as a member of Congresscandidates, parties or yearsthe people who seek or hold office

    A chapter labeled Countries compares countries, but it estimates first within each one. It computes a correlation or a gap among the respondents of each country and then sets those estimates side by side, so it describes how a pattern varies between countries and does not say that a country as a whole holds a view. A row is a country only where the chapter says so. Donor records describe the people who gave, who are not a sample of all Americans.

    A pattern across places can differ from the pattern among the people who live in them. This is the ecological caveat, and the book states it wherever a chapter moves from one grain to another. Where the same question is asked at two grains, the chapters point to each other under the heading "Same question at another grain".

    Survey mode breaks

    Three surveys changed how they collect answers, and a change of mode can move an estimate without any change in opinion. The American National Election Studies added a web mode in 2012. The General Social Survey moved to a mostly web mode from 2021. Nationscape interviewed an opt-in web panel rather than a probability sample. Figures that cross a break mark it on the chart and, where the data allow, show the estimate by mode.

    How to read a figure

    Each figure has a title that states its finding, a subtitle that says what is plotted, and a source line that gives the dataset, the years and whether the estimates are weighted. Lines and bars are labeled directly. Shaded bands are confidence intervals. Color is never the only cue: the same information appears in labels, in the hover text and in the data table.