The Public Mind
Start here
What the book is, how its numbers are made, and where to begin.
The Public Mind is a book about American politics told through survey data, election returns and campaign finance records. Each chapter asks one question, answers it with figures, and ends with what the data cannot show. The first volume follows how party identity absorbed ideology, feeling, social groups and issues. The second asks what left and right mean and what lies beneath them, in the United States, Europe and beyond. The third reads the political map of counties, neighborhoods and money.
41 of 91 chapters are written, all of them drafts that are still being checked. The other 50 are planned: each shows the question it will ask and the data it will use, and states no result.
Three ways in
- Read in orderBegin with the introduction, Party, belief and the political map, and follow the book part by part.
- Start with the map5 chapters that read the vote through the county map.
- Take the grand tour15 chapters, one from each part.
All chapters lists every chapter with its data and status. Explorers are interactive tools that sit beside the parts, and Reference holds the data sources, glossary, figure gallery and methods.
A figure from the book
From Chapter 10.2, Distance from the national vote, 1868 to 2024
In 2024, 79.1% of counties were 20 or more points from the national margin, against 37.3% in 1976
County two-party margin minus the national two-party margin of the same election, percentage points (positive is more Democratic than the nation), seven presidential elections from 1876 to 2024
Loading county values
County margin minus national margin, points (negative is more Republican, positive is more Democratic)
More RepublicanMore Democratic
Values outside −60 to +60 take the end colors.
No data (3,143 counties)
Select a class to show only those places.
Hover or tap a county for its value, or search by name. Zoom with the buttons on the map, then drag to move it.
- Alaska draws as no data. Its election returns are reported by election district, and the district codes cannot be matched to boroughs and census areas.
Read Chapter 10.2, Distance from the national vote, 1868 to 2024
The three volumes
Volume 1
The great sorting
How closely party identity came to line up with ideology, partisan feeling, social groups and issue positions in the United States, 1948 to 2024.
Part I
The sort
Party identification and ideological labels became more closely aligned, including within birth cohorts, and party gaps on different issues opened on different schedules.
Part II
Partisan feeling
Warmth toward one's own party moved little while warmth toward the other party fell, in every group examined.
Part III
The party coalitions
Who votes for each party changed along education, income, race, gender and age.
Part IV
Issue by issue
Each issue has its own partisan gap, its own timing and its own demographic profile.
Part V
Race and racial attitudes
Racial attitudes changed on different schedules by kind of item and became part of partisan and ideological identity.
Part VI
Trust, science and democracy
Confidence in institutions sorted by party, institution by institution, while stated support for democracy held.
Volume 2
Ideology, values and religion
What left and right mean, the values and dispositions beneath them, and the religious divide, in the United States, Europe and about 100 countries.
Part VII
What left and right mean
The left-right label has different contents in different countries and a loose fit with what people want.
Part VIII
Values beneath politics
Basic values and dispositions lean left or right modestly where left and right are structured, and differently elsewhere.
Part IX
Religion and morality
The religious line in politics runs through attendance rather than denomination, most steeply in the United States.
Volume 3
The political map
Counties, neighborhoods, hardship and money: what the map of the American vote records and what it cannot show.
Part X
The nationalized map
County swings collapsed onto one national number, and the county vote now follows composition.
Part XI
Below the county line
A county margin is an average over precincts that are often far more lopsided than the county.
Part XII
Demographic axes of the vote
Education, income, ethnicity and rurality each relate to the county vote differently from what the raw correlation suggests.
Part XIII
Hardship, health and the vote
Different kinds of hardship relate to the vote in different directions, and some relations vanish once race and education are held fixed.
Part XIV
The money map
Campaign donors are concentrated in a few hundred college-heavy counties, and their pool sorted before the electorate did.
Part XV
Place and opinion
Within a party, where someone lives says far less about their views than which party they belong to.
Rules of evidence
Survey estimates are weighted, and each one carries a confidence interval and the number of respondents behind it. Hover over or focus any number in the text to see its estimand, interval, sample size, weights and source. No number in the prose is typed by hand. Each is printed from a data file that the analysis writes, so a number in the text cannot differ from the number in the figure through a transcription error. The file does not check that a sentence names the right population, denominator or interpretation for that number, and those are reviewed separately. A figure's "Show data" table lists the exact values behind every mark.
The language is descriptive. A chapter says that one group is more likely than another, or that a gap widened, and does not say that one thing caused another unless the design supports it. Maps describe the composition of places. A county that votes one way says nothing about any one voter in it.
The grain ladder
Every chapter is labeled with its grain, which sets what a claim can be about. Two units can differ inside one chapter. The unit of estimation is what each row of the data is. The unit of comparison is what the chapter sets side by side once the estimates are made.
| Grain | Each row of the data is | The chapter compares | Claims are about |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals | a person in a survey, or a donor in the campaign finance records | groups of people, years or surveys | the people in the data and the groups they belong to |
| Places | a county, precinct or neighborhood | places, or one place over time | places |
| Countries | a person in a survey, with each estimate made among the people of one country | those estimates across countries | how a relationship or a gap differs from one country to another |
| Officeholders | a candidate or an officeholder, such as a member of Congress | candidates, parties or years | the people who seek or hold office |
A chapter labeled Countries compares countries, but it estimates first within each one. It computes a correlation or a gap among the respondents of each country and then sets those estimates side by side, so it describes how a pattern varies between countries and does not say that a country as a whole holds a view. A row is a country only where the chapter says so. Donor records describe the people who gave, who are not a sample of all Americans.
A pattern across places can differ from the pattern among the people who live in them. This is the ecological caveat, and the book states it wherever a chapter moves from one grain to another. Where the same question is asked at two grains, the chapters point to each other under the heading "Same question at another grain".
Survey mode breaks
Three surveys changed how they collect answers, and a change of mode can move an estimate without any change in opinion. The American National Election Studies added a web mode in 2012. The General Social Survey moved to a mostly web mode from 2021. Nationscape interviewed an opt-in web panel rather than a probability sample. Figures that cross a break mark it on the chart and, where the data allow, show the estimate by mode.
How to read a figure
Each figure has a title that states its finding, a subtitle that says what is plotted, and a source line that gives the dataset, the years and whether the estimates are weighted. Lines and bars are labeled directly. Shaded bands are confidence intervals. Color is never the only cue: the same information appears in labels, in the hover text and in the data table.